The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Managers, Workers, and Corporate Control
Open accessAbstract
If management has high private benefits and a small equity stake, managers and workers are natural allies against takeover threats. Two forces are at play. First, managers can transform employees into a “shark repellent” through long‐term labor contracts and thereby reduce the firm's attractiveness to raiders. Second, employees can act as “white squires” for the incumbent managers. To protect their high wages, they resist hostile takeovers by refusing to sell their shares to the raider or by lobbying against the takeover. The model predicts that wages are inversely correlated with the managerial equity stake, and decline after takeovers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Enjoying the Quiet Life? Corporate Governance and Managerial Preferences
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2003) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/376950 · Cited by 3,777
Takeover Bids, The Free-Rider Problem, and the Theory of the Corporation
Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D. (1980) · The Bell Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/3003400 · Cited by 3,098
Poison or placebo? Evidence on the deterrence and wealth effects of modern antitakeover measures
Comment, R., & Schwert, G. W. (1995) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(94)00823-j · Cited by 751
Corporate Governance and Merger Activity in the United States: Making Sense of the 1980s and 1990s
Holmstrom, B., & Kaplan, S. N. (2001) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.15.2.121 · Cited by 695
Supervision, Loss of Control, and the Optimum Size of the Firm
Calvo, G. A., & Wellisz, S. (1978) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260719 · Cited by 467
Toeholds, Bid Jumps, and Expected Payoffs in Takeovers
Betton, S., & Eckbo, B. E. (2000) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/13.4.841 · Cited by 394
Why Higher Takeover Premia Protect Minority Shareholders
Burkart, M., Gromb, D., & Panunzi, F. (1998) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/250006 · Cited by 354
Capital, Labor, and the Firm: A Study of German Codetermination
Gorton, G., & Schmid, F. A. (2004) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1162/1542476042782260 · Cited by 320
Raiders or saviors? The evidence on six controversial investors
Holderness, C. G., & Sheehan, D. P. (1985) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(85)90026-1 · Cited by 289
Is there Discretion in Wage Setting? A Test Using Takeover Legislation
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (1999) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2556062 · Cited by 221
Cited by
Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices
Edmans, A. (2011) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.021 · Cited by 2,511
Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization: Evidence from mergers
Deng, X., Kang, J.-K., & Low, B. S. (2013) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.04.014 · Cited by 1,647
Stakeholder welfare and firm value
Jiao, Y. (2010) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.04.013 · Cited by 438
The State of Corporate Governance Research
Bebchuk, L. A., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhp121 · Cited by 435
Shareholders and stakeholders: How do directors decide?
Adams, R. B., Licht, A. N., & Sagiv, L. (2011) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.940 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- PAGANO, M., & VOLPIN, P. F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Finance
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03-02
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 841-868
- ISSN
- 0022-1082 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6261
- OpenAlex
- W3122088185
- Cited by
- 523
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 81.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Managers, Workers, and Corporate Control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00748.x
- The paper
- PAGANO, M., & VOLPIN, P. F. (2005). Managers, Workers, and Corporate Control. The Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00748.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.