Cited by 983Business Strategies and InnovationInnovation and Knowledge ManagementEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences

The Business Model in Practice and its Implications for Entrepreneurship Research

Open access
George, Gerard, Bock, Adam J.·2011·Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice

Abstract

While the term “business model” has gained widespread use in the practice community, the academic literature on this topic is fragmented and confounded by inconsistent definitions and construct boundaries. In this study, we review prior research and reframe the business model with an entrepreneurial lens. We report on a discourse analysis of 151 surveys of practicing managers to better understand their conceptualization of a business model. We find that the underlying dimensions of the business model are resource structure, transactive structure, and value structure, and discuss the nature and implications of dimensional dominance for firm characteristics and behavior. These findings provide new directions for theory development and empirical studies in entrepreneurship by linking the business model to entrepreneurial cognition, opportunity co–creation, and organizational outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00424.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The importance of innovativeness confirmed by both PLS-SEM and fsQCA results indicates that BMs represent a component of innovation commercialization that is managed separately, but in accordance with the value innovation process.

    “In addition, the importance of innovativeness confirmed by both PLS-SEM and fsQCA results indicate that BMs represent a component of innovation commercialization that is managed separately, but in accordance with the value innovation process (George & Bock, 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
George, G., & Bock, A. J.
Affiliations
Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
  • George, Gerard
  • Bock, Adam J.
Venue
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
Published
2011-01
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
83-111
ISSN
  • 1042-2587 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-6520
OpenAlex
W3123995026
Cited by
983
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 104 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 26
FWCI
41.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/E019366/1, ES/H046569/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Keywords
business models, entrepreneurship research, resource structure, value structure, entrepreneurial cognition, organizational outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review