The Business Model in Practice and its Implications for Entrepreneurship Research
Open accessAbstract
While the term “business model” has gained widespread use in the practice community, the academic literature on this topic is fragmented and confounded by inconsistent definitions and construct boundaries. In this study, we review prior research and reframe the business model with an entrepreneurial lens. We report on a discourse analysis of 151 surveys of practicing managers to better understand their conceptualization of a business model. We find that the underlying dimensions of the business model are resource structure, transactive structure, and value structure, and discuss the nature and implications of dimensional dominance for firm characteristics and behavior. These findings provide new directions for theory development and empirical studies in entrepreneurship by linking the business model to entrepreneurial cognition, opportunity co–creation, and organizational outcomes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The importance of innovativeness confirmed by both PLS-SEM and fsQCA results indicates that BMs represent a component of innovation commercialization that is managed separately, but in accordance with the value innovation process.
“In addition, the importance of innovativeness confirmed by both PLS-SEM and fsQCA results indicate that BMs represent a component of innovation commercialization that is managed separately, but in accordance with the value innovation process (George & Bock, 2011).”
From Digitalization, business models, and SMEs: How do business model innovation practices improve performance of digitalizing SMEs? (2019) · cites this paper as George & Bock, 2011
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148 · see citing works
Weber, R. (1990) · doi:10.4135/9781412983488 · Cited by 7,750 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The business model: Recent developments and future research
Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311406265 · Cited by 4,790 · see citing works
Bouwman, H., Nikou, S., & de Reuver, M. (2019) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101828 · Cited by 653 · see citing works
Business model innovation in entrepreneurship
Trimi, S., & Berbegal-Mirabent, J. (2012) · International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal · doi:10.1007/s11365-012-0234-3 · Cited by 438 · see citing works
Business Model Innovation as Lever of Organizational Sustainability
Carayannis, E. G., Sindakis, S., & Walter, C. (2015) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-013-9330-y · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Business model innovativeness: designing a formative measure for business model innovation
Spieth, P., & Schneider, S. (2016) · Journal of Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11573-015-0794-0 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Cortimiglia, M. N., Ghezzi, A., & Frank, A. G. (2016) · R&D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.12113 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
The Paradoxes of Telehealth: a Review of the Literature 2000–2015
Standing, C., Standing, S., McDermott, M., Gururajan, R., & Kiani Mavi, R. (2018) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/sres.2442 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
KRAUS, S., BREM, A., SCHUESSLER, M., SCHUESSLER, F., & NIEMAND, T. (2017) · International Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1142/s1363919617500050 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
The effects of culture and structure on strategic flexibility during business model innovation
Bock, A. J., Opsahl, T., George, G., & Gann, D. M. (2012) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01030.x · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Self-citationBusiness model design and innovation: Unlocking the performance benefits of innovation
Gronum, S., Steen, J., & Verreynne, M.-L. (2016) · Australian Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0312896215587315 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
- Authors
- George, G., & Bock, A. J.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- George, Gerard
- Bock, Adam J.
- ORCID
- George, Gerard
- Venue
- Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-111
- ISSN
- 1042-2587 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6520
- OpenAlex
- W3123995026
- Cited by
- 983
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 104 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 41.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/E019366/1, ES/H046569/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Keywords
- business models, entrepreneurship research, resource structure, value structure, entrepreneurial cognition, organizational outcomes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review