Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Catheter Ablation of Recurrent Scar‐Related Ventricular Tachycardia Using Electroanatomical Mapping and Irrigated Ablation Technology: Results of the Prospective Multicenter Euro‐VT‐Study

TANNER, HILDEGARD, HINDRICKS, GERHARD, VOLKMER, MARIUS, FURNISS, STEVE, KÜHLKAMP, VOLKER, LACROIX, DOMINIQUE, DE CHILLOU, CHRISTIAN, ALMENDRAL, JESÚS, CAPONI, DOMENICO, KUCK, KARL‐HEINZ, KOTTKAMP, HANS·2010·Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

Abstract

Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia. Introduction: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) late after myocardial infarction is an important contributor to morbidity and mortality. This prospective multicenter study assessed the efficacy and safety of electroanatomical mapping in combination with open‐saline irrigated ablation technology for ablation of chronic recurrent mappable and unmappable VT in remote myocardial infarction. Methods and Results: In 8 European institutions, 63 patients (89% males) were enrolled in the study. All patients had remote myocardial infarction and presented with a median number of 17 (range 1–380) VTs in the preceding 6 months. Incessant VT was present in 14 patients (22%). Left ventricular ejection fraction measured 30 ± 13%. A mean of 3 VTs were targeted per patient and 22% of all patients had only unmappable VT. The mean follow‐up period was 12 ± 3 months. A total of 164 VTs were targeted during catheter ablation. Ablation was acutely successful in 51 patients (81%). One patient (1.5%) experienced a major complication with degeneration of VT into ventricular fibrillation necessitating cardiopulmonary resuscitation maneuvers. However, no death occurred acutely or within the first 30 days after catheter ablation. During the follow‐up, 19 of the initially successful ablated patients (37%) and 31 of all ablated patients (49%) developed some type of VT recurrence. Conclusions: The results of this multicenter study demonstrate the high acute success rate and a low complication rate of irrigated tip catheter ablation of all clinical relevant VTs in remote myocardial infarction. However, during the follow‐up a relevant number of recurrences occurred. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 47–53, January 2010)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01563.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
TANNER, H., HINDRICKS, G., VOLKMER, M., FURNISS, S., KÜHLKAMP, V., LACROIX, D., DE CHILLOU, C., ALMENDRAL, J., CAPONI, D., KUCK, K., & KOTTKAMP, H.
Venue
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-12-22
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
47-53
ISSN
  • 1045-3873 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8167
OpenAlex
W2152157313
Cited by
265
References
27
FWCI
10.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Catheter Ablation of Recurrent Scar‐Related Ventricular Tachycardia Using Electroanatomical Mapping and Irrigated Ablation Technology: Results of the Prospective Multicenter Euro‐VT‐Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01563.x
The paper
TANNER, H., HINDRICKS, G., VOLKMER, M., FURNISS, S., KÜHLKAMP, V., LACROIX, D., DE CHILLOU, C., ALMENDRAL, J., CAPONI, D., KUCK, K., & KOTTKAMP, H. (2010). Catheter Ablation of Recurrent Scar‐Related Ventricular Tachycardia Using Electroanatomical Mapping and Irrigated Ablation Technology: Results of the Prospective Multicenter Euro‐VT‐Study. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01563.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.