Cited by 299Behavioral Health and InterventionsMedia Influence and HealthHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

Safer Sex Behavior: The Role of Attitudes, Norms, and Control Factors

White, Katherine M., Terry, Deborah J., Hogg, Michael A.·1994·Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Abstract

A study was undertaken to assess the utility of revisions to the theories of reasoned action/planned behavior in the context of HIV‐preventive behaviors. Revisions to the models incorporated the addition of group norm (behavioral norm and group attitude) to the nonnative component of the reasoned action model and the distinction among three aspects (self‐efficacy, perceived behavioral control, and planning) of the control component of the theory of planned behavior. Respondents were 211 sexually experienced heterosexual undergraduates. The study employed a longitudinal design, with the proposed predictors of performing the behaviors under consideration (using a condom every time you have sexual intercourse during the next month and discussing whether to use a condom with any new partners during the next month) assessed prior to the measures of reported behavior. Consistent with expectations, group norm emerged as a distinctive predictor (in addition to attitude and subjective norm) of intentions to practice both safer sex behaviors. The data also revealed some support for the distinction among the different measures of control. The results of the study suggest that the normative component of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior should be revised to incorporate more subtle influences of the referent group and that tests of theory of planned behavior should distinguish among the different aspects of behavioral control.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb02378.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research has provided support for the social identity perspective on the role of norms in attitude-behavior relations.

    “Previous research has provided support for this perspective on the role of norms in attitude-behavior relations (e.g., Åstrøm & Rise, 2001;Johnston & White, 2003;Smith & Terry, 2003;Terry & Hogg, 1996;Terry et al., 1999;Terry, Hogg, & McKimmie, 2000;Wellen, Hogg, & Terry, 1998;White, Terry, & Hogg, 1994;see Smith & Hogg, in press for a recent review).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
White, K. M., Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
White, Katherine M.
Venue
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-12
Volume
24
Issue
24
Pages
2164-2192
ISSN
  • 0021-9029 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-1816
OpenAlex
W1556477537
Cited by
299
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 16
FWCI
7.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Keywords
safer sex behavior, condom use, HIV prevention, theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior, subjective norms, collective attitudes, self-efficacy, perceived behavioral control, planning, sexual behavior intentions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review