Cited by 359Impact of Technology on AdolescentsTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourBehavioral Health and Interventions

Predicting adolescents' use of social networking sites from an extended theory of planned behaviour perspective

Baker, Rosland K., White, Katherine M.·2010·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.006

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baker, R. K., & White, K. M.
Affiliations
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
White, Katherine M.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-11
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
1591-1597
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979449984
Cited by
359
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 9
FWCI
44.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
social networking sites, adolescents, extended theory of planned behavior, self-esteem, attitudes, perceived behavioral control, intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review