Cited by 87Behavioral Health and InterventionsPsychology of Social InfluenceSocial Power and Status Dynamics

Social norms as communicative phenomena: A communication perspective on the theory of normative social behavior

Open access
Geber, Sarah, Hefner, Dorothée·2019·Studies in Communication | Media

Abstract

Much of human behavior is influenced by social norms.Although communication represents one important mechanism through which norms are formed and disseminated, the role of communication has not yet received sufficient attention in social norms research.The present paper develops a communication perspective on normative social influences by applying the theory of normative social behavior (TNSB) as a guiding framework.Taking into account recent and significant changes in our media environment, propositions on the role of communication with referent others (online and offline) a) in the building of norms and b) for the moderation of normative social influences on behaviors are stated.We discuss the benefits and limitations of our communication perspective and raise questions that should be considered in future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5771/2192-4007-2019-1-6

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social norms are tied to groups and influence an individual's behavior because the group is relevant for the individual in the respective social context.

    “Social norms are tied to groups and influence an individual's behavior because the group is relevant for the individual in the respective social context (Geber & Hefner, 2019; Hogg & Reid, 2006).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 97 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geber, S., & Hefner, D.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Venue
Studies in Communication | Media
Publisher
Nomos Verlag
Published
2019
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
6-28
ISSN
2192-4007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2926470829
Cited by
87
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2019: 3
FWCI
5.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Studies in Communication and Media (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
social norms, theory of normative social behavior, normative influence, norm formation, online communication, offline communication, media environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review