The DOI matches its Crossref record; 138 of the 139 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence
Abstract
This paper reviews the empirical evidence of the effect of credibility of the message source on persuasion over a span of 5 decades, primarily to come up with recommendations for practitioners as to when to use a high‐ or a low‐credibility source and secondarily to identify areas for future research. The main effect studies of source credibility on persuasion seem to indicate the superiority of a high‐credibility source over a low‐credibility one. Interaction effect studies, however, show source credibility to be a liability under certain conditions. The variables found to interact with source credibility are categorized into 5 categories: source, message, channel, receiver, and destination variables. The most heavily researched variables have been the message and receiver variables. Implications for marketers/advertisers and suggestions for future research are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“based on a well-established body of literature in persuasion demonstrating that aspects of a message’s source can influence the persuasiveness of the message (Briñol & Petty, 2009; Kumkale et al., 2010; Pornpitakpan, 2004; Wilson & Sherrell, 1993), the source of a fear appeal communication should be an important moderator for fear appeal effectiveness.”
From Appealing to fear: A meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories (2015) · cites this paper as Pornpitakpan, 2004
In the citing paper
“The credibility of information that propagates in a social network is a critical factor that can shape the beliefs: if incoming information from a person's social network carries no credibility, then it is less likely to be incorporated in to the belief of the person (Pornpitakpan, 2004;Heesacker et al., 1983).”
From Credibility of climate change denial in social media (2019) · cites this paper as Pornpitakpan, 2004
In the citing paper
“Among various information about climate change to which people are exposed to, they are more likely to be influenced by information that have higher credibility.”
From Credibility of climate change denial in social media (2019) · cites this paper as Pornpitakpan, 2004
Citations
Cites
(2025) · doi:10.53555/acr.v2i2 · Cited by 13,486
The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness
Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/266350 · Cited by 3,543
Lumsdaine, A. A. (1954) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02713272 · Cited by 2,237
Personal involvement as a determinant of argument based persuasion
Petty, R., Cacioppo, J., & Goldman, R. (1981) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.5.847 · Cited by 2,061
Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.3.460 · Cited by 1,620
Goldsmith, R. E., Lafferty, B. A., & Newell, S. J. (2000) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2000.10673616 · Cited by 1,301
The Impact of Celebrity Spokespersons’ Perceived Image on Consumers’ Intention to Purchase
Ohanian, R. (1991) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.1080/00218499.1991.12466759 · Cited by 1,266
Cognitive Responses in Persuasion
Petty, R. E., Ostrom, T. M., & Brock, T. C. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315803012 · Cited by 1,223
DIMENSIONS FOR EVALUATING THE ACCEPTABILITY OF MESSAGE SOURCES
Berlo, D. K., Lemert, J. B., & Mertz, R. J. (1969) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/267745 · Cited by 831
Scales for the measurement of ethos
McCroskey, J. C. (1966) · Speech Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637756609375482 · Cited by 648
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- 10.1037/0021-9010.71.2.203 · DOI
- Chen L. C., 1998, The mediating role of prior knowledge and involvement in the response to persuasive appeals, Dissertation Abstracts International: Sciences and Engineering, 58, 39
- Czapinski J., 1979, Dynamics of interpersonal attitudes: Positive‐negative asymmetry, Polish Psychological Bulletin, 10, 31
- Freeman W., 1957, The big name
- Freiden J. B., 1984, October/November, Journal of Advertising Research, 24, 33
- Friedman H. H., 1979, October/November, Journal of Advertising Research, 19, 63
- Hass R. G., 1977, The effects of source credibility and message structure on persuasion
- 10.1037/0022-3514.42.3.412 · DOI
- Herron T. L., 1997, The persuasion effects of time pressure and source expertise in an audit setting: An elaboration likelihood application, Dissertation Abstracts International: Humanities and Social Sciences, 57, 44
- Hilibrand M., 1964, Source credibility and the persuasive process
- Hunt K., 1972, proceedings of the third annual conference of the Association for Consumer Research, 370
- Kamen J. ML., 1975, April, Journal of Advertising Research, 15, 17
- March B., 1970, Credibility, sequence volition, and discrepancy as determinants of attitude change in a forced‐compliance situation
- McGuire W. J., 1978, Behavioral and management sciences in marketing, 156
- Mowen J. C., 1981, Advances in consumer research, 437
- Petty R. E., 1981, Attitude and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches
- Petty R. E., 1981, Advances in consumer research, 20
- Solomon H., 1972, The effects of multiple exposure, source credibility, and initial opinion on communication effectiveness
- Suzuki K., 1978, July, Japanese Psychological Research, 20, 60
- Topalova V., 1974, Credibility of information source, Polish Psychological Bulletin, 5, 73
- 10.2307/3151253 · DOI
- 10.2307/3150562 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15327825mcs0103&4_3 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,002
Jungherr, A. M., Wuttke, A., Mader, M., & Schoen, H. (2021) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqab005 · Cited by 20
Chen, Y., Lin, I., Huang, C., & Chen, H. (2024) · Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research · doi:10.3390/jtaer19040163 · Cited by 19
“The sway of KOLs is anchored in their expertise and domain [25].”
Sales Pipeline Technology: Automated Lead Nurturing
Habel, J., Hartmann, N. N., Wiseman, P., Ahearne, M., & Vaid, S. (2025) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/00222429251321417 · Cited by 24
“Such literature has established that salesperson adaptation of communication is ef fi cacious in persuading buyers (Franke and Park 2006; Szymanski 1988) and that persuaders with greater credibility are more successful in their persuasion attempts (Pornpitakpan 2004).”
van Houwelingen, G., Stam, D. A., & Giessner, S. R. (2017) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12469 · Cited by 19
“Unpresidented!” or: What happens when the president attacks the federal judiciary on Twitter
Kromphardt, C. D., & Salamone, M. F. (2020) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2020.1805389 · Cited by 19
The effect of source credibility on bullshit receptivity
Ilić, S., & Damnjanović, K. (2021) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3852 · Cited by 18
Trust Indicators and Explainable AI: A Study on User Perceptions
Ribes, D., Henchoz, N., Portier, H., Défayes, L., Phan, T., Gática-Pérez, D., & Sonderegger, A. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85616-8_39 · Cited by 20
Giese, H., Neth, H., & Gaissmaier, W. (2021) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.09.016 · Cited by 19
Li, H., Chen, B., Chen, Z., Shi, L., & Su, D. (2022) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2022.2074776 · Cited by 20
“High-credibility sources are more persuasive than low-credibility sources (Pornpitakpan, 2006).”
BackgroundLiu, B., Xu, Y., Chen, Y., Lu, S., & Zhao, D. (2022) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2022.102738 · Cited by 19
Xia, Y., Xu, Q., Fang, J., Tang, R., & Du, P. (2023) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122245 · Cited by 19
Millet, B., Tang, J., Seelig, M. I., Petit, J., & Sun, R. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108185 · Cited by 19
‘Follow the science’: Popular trust in scientific experts during the coronavirus pandemic
Seyd, B., Hamm, J. A., Jennings, W., McKay, L., Valgarðsson, V. O., & Anness, M. (2024) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625241253968 · Cited by 19
“Instead, many are likely to have fallen back on heuristic evaluations, notably judgements about whether those scientists could be trusted (Hovland et al., 1953; Pornpitakpan, 2004; Siegrist and Cvetkovich, 2000).”
Taylor, W. D., Johnson, G., Ault, M. K., Griffith, J. A., Rozzell, B. L., Connelly, S., Jensen, M. L., Dunbar, N. E., & Ness, A. M. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.071 · Cited by 20
“However, given the robustness of the effects of credibility on attitudes (Pornpitakpan, 2004), we predict that a website with more credibility cues will still be more impactful on attitudes and agreement than one with fewer cues.”
BackgroundThe Effects of Journalist Opinionation on Learning From the News
Feldman, L. (2011) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01602.x · Cited by 19
The Impact of Word of Mouth on Organizational Attractiveness
Uen, J. F., Peng, S. P., Chen, S. Y., & CHIEN, S.-H. (2011) · Asia Pacific Management Review · doi:10.6126/apmr.2011.16.3.03 · Cited by 19
“Previous studies have indicated that the effect of word of mouth on organizational attractiveness might be greater for strong ties (Bansal and Voyer, 2000; Fisher et al., 1979; Pornpitakpan, 2004; Van Hoye and Lievens, 2007).”
BackgroundHow Attitudes Toward Product Categories Drive Individual Brand Attitudes and Choice
Posavac, S. S., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Seo, J. Y., & Iacobucci, D. (2014) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20738 · Cited by 19
Hummer, J., & Davison, G. (2016) · Substance Use & Misuse · doi:10.1080/10826084.2016.1197258 · Cited by 18
“A review of five decades of empirical literature on the relationship between source credibility and persuasion reveals that a high credibility source is more persuasive than is a low credibility source in both changing attitudes and achieving behavioral compliance (Pornpitakpan, 2004).”
BackgroundCigarette Constituent Health Communications for Smokers: Impact of Chemical, Imagery, and Source
Kowitt, S. D., Sheeran, P., Jarman, K. L., Ranney, L. M., Schmidt, A. M., Noar, S. M., Huang, L., & Goldstein, A. O. (2017) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntx226 · Cited by 19
Soesilo, P. K. M., Gunadi, W., & Arimbi, I. R. (2018) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/13527266.2018.1545245 · Cited by 21
“…to ads (e.g., Petty, Cacioppo, and Schumann 1983); purchase intention (e.g., Bower and Landreth 2001; La Ferle and Choi 2005; Ohanian 1991; Pornpitakpan 2004); persuasiveness on different types of products (Radder and Huang 2008); and attitudes toward the ad (Goldsmith, Lafferty, and…”
BackgroundGuntzviller, L. M., Liao, D., Pulido, M. D., Butkowski, C. P., & Campbell, A. D. (2019) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637751.2019.1643060 · Cited by 20
“We focus on recipients’ assessments of advisor expertise (Pornpitakpan, 2004) and relational satisfaction (McEwan & Guerrero, 2012), as these are, respectively, influential advisor and relational characteristics that have not been assessed pre-interaction (Guntzviller, Ratcliff, et al., 2017).”
BackgroundSwol, L. M. V., Prahl, A., & Kolb, M. R. (2019) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2019.1610022 · Cited by 19
Celebrity endorsement: Conceptual clarifications, critical review, and future research perspectives
Ambroise, L., & Albert, N. (2019) · Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition) · doi:10.1177/2051570719876198 · Cited by 19
“Credibility, a fundamental persuasive feature of the source of a message, has received much attention in celebrity endorsement studies (see Pornpitakpan, 2004, for a complete synthesis).”
BackgroundThe role of tie strength in assessing credibility of scientific content on facebook
Hershkovitz, A., & Hayat, T. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101261 · Cited by 20
Probing Language Teachers’ Stroking and Credibility in Relation to Their Success in Class
Pishghadam, R., & Karami, M. (2018) · Alberta Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.55016/ojs/ajer.v63i4.56431 · Cited by 19
“In the same vein, a number of researchers (e.g., Chaiken & Maheswaran, 1994; Pornpitakpan, 2004; Tormala, Briñol, & Petty; 2006) have shown that being perceived as credible plays a crucial role in the efficiency of dissuasion or persuasion of the audience.”
BackgroundMustafa, G., & Lines, R. (2014) · Journal of Leadership Studies · doi:10.1002/jls.21307 · Cited by 19
Bekk, M., & Spörrle, M. (2010) · The Open Psychology Journal · doi:10.2174/1874350101003010054 · Cited by 19
Chang, M., Ng, J., & Yu, K. (2008) · Australian Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/031289620803300104 · Cited by 22
“The literature on source credibility generally suggests that the higher the credibility of the source, the greater its persuasive effectiveness (see Pornpitakpan 2004 for a review).”
BackgroundMeasuring Source Credibility of Social Engineering Attackers on Facebook
Algarni, A., Xu, Y., & Chan, T. (2016) · 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2016.460 · Cited by 18
“A highly credible source is commonly found to induce more persuasion toward the acceptance of the message than a low-credibility one (e.g., [51] and [34]).”
BackgroundGendron, M., Mesquita, B., & Barrett, L. F. (2020) · Culture, Mind, and Brain · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.010 · Cited by 20
Wijn, R., & van den Bos, K. (2009) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167209347382 · Cited by 18
“Even more relevant for the current purposes, studies on persuasive communication have found that self-interest hinders persuasion (Friestad & Wright, 1994; for an overview, see Pornpitakpan, 2004).”
Background(S)pin the flu vaccine: Recipes for concern
Guidry, J. P. D., Coman, I. A., Vraga, E. K., O’Donnell, N. H., & Sreepada, N. (2020) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.06.012 · Cited by 18
Wertgen, A. G., Richter, T., & Rouet, J. (2021) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/0163853x.2021.1881342 · Cited by 20
“In the present research, we focused on the expertise dimension, which refers to “the extent to which a speaker is received to be capable of making correct assertions” (Pornpitakpan, 2004, p. 244).”
MethodEyewitness testimony and epistemic agency
Lackey, J. A. (2021) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.12380 · Cited by 19
Wertgen, A. G., & Richter, T. (2022) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2022.2149757 · Cited by 22
“…speaker is perceived to be capable of making correct assertions”, whereas trustworthiness “refers to the degree to which an audience perceives the assertions made by a communicator to be ones that the speaker considers valid” (Pornpitakpan, 2004, p. 244; see also Lombardi et al., 2014; Self, 2009).”
BackgroundOvercoming the blockchain technology credibility gap
Mazzù, M. F., Pozharliev, R., Andria, A., & Baccelloni, A. (2023) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21855 · Cited by 19
Fan, C., Wang, X., & Yu, G. (2023) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-07-2022-0497 · Cited by 18
Zimmermann, D., Klee, A., & Kaspar, K. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1257994 · Cited by 29
“While message credibility is defined as “an individual’s judgment of the veracity of the content of communication” (Appelman and Sundar, 2016, p. 63), source credibility is referred to as the credibility of the message’s source (Pornpitakpan, 2004).”
BackgroundTrust of information on social media : an elaboration likelihood model
Pee, L. G. (2012) · DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) · Cited by 18
Word of mouth as a recruitment source: An integrative model.
Hoye, G. V. (2014) · Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) · Cited by 18
Lantzy, S., Hamilton, R. W., Chen, Y., & Stewart, K. (2020) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1177/0743915620950676 · Cited by 20
“In general, credible information has a stronger impact on behavior than less credible information (Pornpitakpan 2004).”
BackgroundDeriving Features of Religions in the Wild
Boyer, P. (2021) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-021-09410-y · Cited by 22
“This is the general phenomenon studied in formal models of advice-taking (Pornpitakpan, 2004; Sobel, 2013), distinct from those highly specific situations, in which an agent produces both a statement and a behavior that would be risky if the statement was false, therefore boosting their credibility…”
BackgroundThe optics of fraud: affiliations that enhance offender credibility
Perri, F. S., & Brody, R. G. (2012) · Journal of Financial Crime · doi:10.1108/13590791211266359 · Cited by 18
Willemsen, L. M., Neijens, P. C., & Bronner, F. E. (2011) · Gabler eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-8349-6854-8_27 · Cited by 19
Sending an Avatar to Do a Human's Job: Compliance with Authority Persists Despite the Uncanny Valley
Patel, H., & MacDorman, K. F. (2015) · PRESENCE Virtual and Augmented Reality · doi:10.1162/pres_a_00212 · Cited by 19
“A source’s persuasiveness can be increased indirectly by manipulating the message (Pornpitakpan, 2004).”
BackgroundPersuasive Technology and Users Acceptance of E-commerce
Alhammad, M. M., & Gulliver, S. R. (2014) · Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations · doi:10.4018/jeco.2014040101 · Cited by 18
The Effects of Trust and Management Incentives on Audit Committee Judgments
Rose, A. M., Rose, J. M., & Dibben, M. R. (2010) · Behavioral Research in Accounting · doi:10.2308/bria.2010.22.2.87 · Cited by 18
Worthington, A. K., Nussbaum, J. F., & Parrott, R. L. (2015) · Communication Research Reports · doi:10.1080/08824096.2015.1016153 · Cited by 18
“More recent work examined empirical data on source credibility of an author between 1950 and 2000 and concluded that ‘‘a highly credible [author] is commonly found to induce more persuasion toward the advocacy than a low-credibility one’’ (Pornpitakpan, 2004, p. 244).”
BackgroundAssessing Source Credibility On Social Media–––An Electronic Word-Of-Mouth Communication Perspective
Hu, X. M. (2015) · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network) · Cited by 18
A Study on Exploring the Factors Influencing Celebrity Endorsement Credibility
Singh, R. P., & Banerjee, N. (2017) · Global Business Review · doi:10.1177/0972150917713537 · Cited by 18
Assessing the Credibility of Decisional Guidance Delivered by Information Systems
Hardin, A. M., Looney, C. A., & Moody, G. D. (2017) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2017.1394073 · Cited by 18
“While high credibility can be effective for shaping attitudes [38], other research has shown low credibility to be more efficient for this purpose [5, 6].”
BackgroundExamining moderating role of personal identifying information in travel related decisions
Garg, P., & Pandey, A. K. (2020) · International Journal of Tourism Cities · doi:10.1108/ijtc-06-2019-0083 · Cited by 19
Molin, V., & Nordgren, S. (2019) · Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) · Cited by 18
Dimensions of leadership and social influence in online communities
Diermeier, D. A., Contractor, N., & Huffaker, D. A. (2009) · Cited by 17
Peifer, J. T. (2018) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213269.2017.1421470 · Cited by 20
“Generally speaking, empirical research indicates that highly credible sources tend to be more persuasive than low-credibility sources (Pornpitakpan, 2004).”
BackgroundThorpe, A., Sirota, M., Juanchich, M., & Orbell, S. (2020) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12411 · Cited by 17
Exploring the Usefulness of User-Generated Content for Business Intelligence in Innovation
Daradkeh, M. K. (2021) · International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems · doi:10.4018/ijeis.2021040103 · Cited by 17
Susmann, M. W., & Wegener, D. T. (2022) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-022-01374-3 · Cited by 19
“Expert sources have been found to be more persuasive than nonexpert sources (Hovland & Weiss, 1951; Petty et al., 1981; Pornpitakpan, 2004), to validate thoughts in response to persuasive messages more than nonexpert sources (Tormala et al., 2006), and to have greater impact on subsequent product…”
BackgroundWu, M., Long, R., Chen, H., & Wang, J. (2023) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-023-03870-1 · Cited by 22
“The credibility of the broadcast source is also an important factor in determining the success of climate change news, as noted in studies by Vosoughi et al. (2018), Pornpitakpan (2004), and Betsch and Sachse (2013).”
Encouraging politicians to act on climate: A field experiment with local officials in six countries
Pereira, M. M., Giger, N., Perez, M. D., & Axelsson, K. (2024) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12841 · Cited by 18
Influence of Virtual Live Streamers’ Credibility on Online Sales Performance
Ji, X. (2024) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440241271171 · Cited by 23
“The term Trustworthiness means that the virtual live streamer is dependable, honest, and reliable (Pornpitakpan, 2004).”
InfluentialDon’t believe them! Reducing misinformation influence through source discreditation
Ecker, U. K. H., Prike, T., Paver, A. B., Scott, R. J., & Swire‐Thompson, B. (2024) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-024-00581-7 · Cited by 19
“One social factor known to affect reliance on corrected misinformation is source credibility, which refers to the perceived trustworthiness and expertise of a message source (Pornpitakpan, 2004).”
BackgroundLoades, M. E., Higson‐Sweeney, N., Teague, B., Leas, J., Payne-Cook, C., Slastikova, A., Peel, H., Chamberlain, G., Ferguson, L., Janes, K., et al. (2024) · Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1111/papt.12550 · Cited by 20
“This is consistent with other studies of YP (Best et al., 2016) and adults (Fisher et al., 2023) and is in line with the concept of source credibility (Pornpitakpan, 2004) and the institutional trust aspect of the comprehensive model of information seeking (Liu & Yang, 2023).”
Effects of communication media on the interpretation of critical feedback
Bietz, M. J. (2008) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/1460563.1460637 · Cited by 18
“For feedback to be persuasive, the recipient must believe that the feedback is coming from a legitimate source [16, 17 ].”
BackgroundLockie, M. A., Waiguny, M. K. J., & Grabner‐Kräuter, S. (2015) · Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) · doi:10.1016/j.ausmj.2015.01.005 · Cited by 19
“The majority of research on online reviews has concentrated on the valence (Floh et al., 2013), consistency (e.g. Schindler and Decker, 2013) and the source credibility of reviews (Pornpitakpan, 2004).”
BackgroundSport event tourists’ (SET’s) behavior: a case study of the PyeongChang Winter Olympics
Park, J.-W., Kim, M., Nauright, J., & Kim, Y. H. (2020) · International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship · doi:10.1108/ijsms-09-2019-0101 · Cited by 18
Wobbrock, J. O., Hattatoglu, L., Hsu, A. K., Burger, M. A., & Magee, M. J. (2021) · New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia · doi:10.1080/13614568.2021.1889690 · Cited by 18
“Pornpitakpan (2004) provides a thorough review of research on source credibility.”
BackgroundPodolsky, M., & Hackett, R. D. (2021) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2021.2006746 · Cited by 18
“Using the four-step Preacher and Kelley (2011) analytical approach, H4a was supported; global service climate mediated between HRM system strength agreement and financial performance.”
BackgroundMethodQuantifying Reviewer Credibility in Online Tourism
Wang, Y., Chan, S. C. F., Ngai, G., & Leong, H. V. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40285-2_33 · Cited by 17
The credibility of advertising vs publicity for new FMCGs in Turkey
Celebi, S. I. (2007) · Corporate Communications An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13563280710744838 · Cited by 17
“In 1984, Freiden studied the interaction between source credibility and demographics of recipients and reported no interaction between endorser type and age of audiences ( Pornpitakpan, 2004”
BackgroundMulti-dimension reviewer credibility quantification across diverse travel communities
Wang, Y., Chan, S. C. F., Leong, H. V., Ngai, G., & Au, N. (2016) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-016-0927-y · Cited by 17
Landrum, A. R., Hilgard, J., Lull, R. B., Akin, H., & Jamieson, K. H. (2018) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.17020204 · Cited by 17
“These ways of operationalizing trustworthiness are based on prior research by Critchley [2008] and theories of epistemic trust, credibility, and dimensions of social cognition [Fiske, Cuddy and Glick, 2007; Landrum, Eaves and Shafto, 2015; Pornpitakpan, 2004].”
MethodJudgment Effects of Familiarity with an Analyst's Name
Chen, W., & Tan, H. (2013) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2013.02.001 · Cited by 17
Chinn, C. A., & Rinehart, R. W. (2016) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-016-9675-3 · Cited by 17
The Effect of Humanizing Robo-Advisors on Investor JudgmentsPreprint
Hodge, F. D., Mendoza, K. I., & Sinha, R. K. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3158004 · Cited by 21
Typology and impact of follower responses to social media influencer “promotional crisis”
Rynarzewska, A. I., Nafees, L., & Nikolov, A. N. (2024) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.22133 · Cited by 16
Hershkovitz, A., Tabach, M., Reich, Y., Lurie, L., & Cholcman, T. (2025) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems13070518 · Cited by 26
Protesters on message? Explaining demonstrators’ differential degrees of frame alignment
Ketelaars, P., Walgrave, S., & Wouters, R. (2017) · Social movement studies · doi:10.1080/14742837.2017.1280387 · Cited by 16
“…others, depending on their motivation and issue involvement (Chong & Druckman, 2007), the strength of their predispositions (Brewer, 2003), or how credible they judge the source of the message to be (Pornpitakpan, 2004; for a similar argument related to frame alignment see Benford & Snow, 2000).”
BackgroundLins, S., & Sunyaev, A. (2022) · Behavior and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2022.2113432 · Cited by 19
Reynolds, R. M., Popova, L., Ashley, D. L., Henderson, K. C., Ntansah, C. A., Yang, B. K., Hackworth, E. E., Hardin, J. W., & Thrasher, J. F. (2022) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tc-2022-057577 · Cited by 16
Wang, J., & Tanes, Z. (2022) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2022.2153842 · Cited by 16
“Messages delivered by credible, likable sources are more likely to change message recipients’ attitudes than sources with low credibility or likability (Brinol & Petty, 2009; Pornpitakpan, 2004).”
BackgroundMessage matters: Correcting organisational fake news
Kropf, B., Wood, M., & Parsons, K. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107732 · Cited by 19
Carver, B. T., Muriel, L., & Trinkle, B. S. (2023) · Behavioral Research in Accounting · doi:10.2308/bria-19-031 · Cited by 24
Li, H., Chen, B., Chen, Z., Chen, L., Zhang, D. “., Wen, M., Li, J., Li, Y., Han, X., & Su, D. (2023) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2023.2245373 · Cited by 16
“High-credibility sources are more persuasive than low-credibility sources (Pornpitakpan, 2006).”
Hughes, J. P., Weick, M., & Vasiljevic, M. (2023) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2023.107026 · Cited by 16
“A seminal review by Pornpitakpan (2004) showed the more credible a message was the more effective it was at altering behaviour.”
BackgroundRusso, V., Bilucaglia, M., Casiraghi, C., Chiarelli, S., Columbano, M., Fici, A., Rivetti, F., Rossi, C., Valesi, R., & Zito, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1238879 · Cited by 18
“A seller that communicates credibility and makes effective persuasive communications, can be a precious source for selling success and consumer trust (Pornpitakpan, 2004; Muda and Hamzah, 2021).”
BackgroundLuan, C., Chen, K., Ko, C., Lin, P., & Phan, T. A. (2024) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.2319 · Cited by 21
Peer-supplied credibility labels as an online misinformation intervention
Pareek, S., & Gonçalves, J. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103276 · Cited by 20
Antecedents and consequences of perceived helpfulness of extremely positive and exaggerated reviews
Román, S., Riquelme, I. P., & Iacobucci, D. (2024) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103907 · Cited by 19
Deng, G., Kang, J., Li-juan, H., & Ying, X. (2025) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104248 · Cited by 18
If Only They Knew: Audience Expectations and Actual Sourcing Practices in Online Journalism
Manninen, V. (2019) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2019.1625719 · Cited by 16
“Trust, however, is not omniscient: it can only be based on the outward expressions of desirable characteristics, i.e., credibility (for a broad overview of general credibility studies, see Pornpitakpan2004).”
BackgroundTaillandier, P., Salliou, N., & Thomopoulos, R. (2021) · Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation · doi:10.18564/jasss.4531 · Cited by 17
“Other factors can impact the perception of an argument, and among them, the source of the argument (Pornpitakpan 2004).”
BackgroundAffective and cognitive reactions towards emerging food safety risks in Europe
Vocht, M. D., Cauberghe, V., Uyttendaele, M., & Sas, B. (2015) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2013.879486 · Cited by 18
“Trust is one of the key principles of effective risk communication (e.g. Pornpitakpan 2004; Siegrist and Cvetkovich 2000; Visschers and Siegrist 2008; Wachinger et al. 2012).”
BackgroundThe Anti-Fracking Movement in Ireland: Perspectives from the Media and Activists
Steger, T., & Drehobl, A. (2017) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2017.1392333 · Cited by 16
“The “credibility of the articulator” (Benford & Snow, 2000) or “source credibility” (Druckman, 2001) is based on whether an actor is perceived as knowledgeable and trustworthy (Pornpitakan, 2004).”
BackgroundExploring readers’ evaluations of native advertisements in a mobile news app
Krouwer, S., Poels, K., & Paulussen, S. (2019) · Journal of Media Business Studies · doi:10.1080/16522354.2019.1573396 · Cited by 16
“Still, the fi ndings suggest that the source credibility theory should be taken into account when investigating readers ’ perceptions of native advertisements (Pornpitakpan, 2004).”
BackgroundInfluentialCreating an Advanced Practice Nurse–friendly Culture
Richmond, T. S., & Becker, D. (2005) · AACN Clinical Issues Advanced Practice in Acute & Critical Care · doi:10.1097/00044067-200501000-00007 · Cited by 16
Renaud, K., & Goucher, W. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07620-1_32 · Cited by 16
Belief updating in the face of misinformation: The role of source reliability
Sanna, G. A., & Lagnado, D. A. (2025) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106090 · Cited by 20
“In a meta-analysis spanning five decades, Pornpitakpan (2004) found that a highly credible source is more likely to persuade people than a low-credibility source (e. g. Horai et al., 1974; Hovland & Weiss, 1951; Johnson et al., 1968; Johnson & Izzett, 1969; Lirtzman & Shuv-Ami, 1986; Maddux &…”
Chung, M. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · Cited by 15
Can precise numbers boost energy efficiency?
Bansal, S., & Muthulingam, S. (2022) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.13749 · Cited by 15
“Studies show that in uncertain environments, credible information is more likely to influence decision makers (e.g., Petty & Wegener, 1998; Pornpitakpan, 2004).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Pornpitakpan, C.
- Affiliations
- Monash University Malaysia (MY)
- Corresponding author
- Pornpitakpan, Chanthika
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 243-281
- ISSN
- 0021-9029 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-1816
- OpenAlex
- W2157392583
- Cited by
- 2,205
- References
- 139
- Citations by year
- 2026: 180 · 2025: 183 · 2024: 173 · 2023: 184 · 2022: 185 · 2021: 173 · 2020: 187 · 2019: 135 · 2018: 99 · 2017: 119 · 2016: 90 · 2015: 88 · 2014: 84 · 2013: 84 · 2012: 50
- FWCI
- 69.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychology of Social Influence
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Marketing and Advertising Strategies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Keywords
- source credibility, persuasion, interaction effects, message characteristics, receiver characteristics, communication channels, advertising, marketing communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review