Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 363

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The phylogeny of proteobacteria: relationships to other eubacterial phyla and eukaryotes

Open access
Radhey S. Gupta·2000·FEMS Microbiology Reviews

Abstract

The evolutionary relationships of proteobacteria, which comprise the largest and phenotypically most diverse division among prokaryotes, are examined based on the analyses of available molecular sequence data. Sequence alignments of different proteins have led to the identification of numerous conserved inserts and deletions (referred to as signature sequences), which either are unique characteristics of various proteobacterial species or are shared by only members from certain subdivisions of proteobacteria. These signature sequences provide molecular means to define the proteobacterial phyla and their various subdivisions and to understand their evolutionary relationships to the other groups of eubacteria as well as the eukaryotes. Based on signature sequences that are present in different proteins it is now possible to infer that the various eubacterial phyla evolved from a common ancestor in the following order: low-G+C Gram-positive-->high-G+C Gram-positive-->Deinococcus-Thermus (green nonsulfur bacteria)-->cyanobacteria-->Spirochetes-->Chlamydia-Cytophaga-Aquifex -green sulfur bacteria-->Proteobacteria-1 (epsilon and delta)-->Proteobacteria-2 (alpha)-->Proteobacteria-3 (beta)-->Proteobacteria-4 (gamma). An unexpected but important aspect of the relationship deduced here is that the main eubacterial phyla are related to each other linearly rather than in a tree-like manner, suggesting that the major evolutionary changes within Bacteria have taken place in a directional manner. The identified signatures permit placement of prokaryotes into different groups/divisions and could be used for determinative purposes. These signatures generally support the origin of mitochondria from an alpha-proteobacterium and provide evidence that the nuclear cytosolic homologs of many genes are also derived from proteobacteria.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.1016/s0168-6445(00)00031-0

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 363

Metadata

Authors
Gupta, R. S.
Venue
FEMS Microbiology Reviews
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Published
2000-10-01
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
367-402
ISSN
0168-6445 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131596454
Cited by
363
References
10
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The phylogeny of proteobacteria: relationships to other eubacterial phyla and eukaryotes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0168-6445(00)00031-0
The paper
Gupta, R. S. (2000). The phylogeny of proteobacteria: relationships to other eubacterial phyla and eukaryotes. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-6445(00)00031-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.