The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ENMTools: a toolbox for comparative studies of environmental niche models
Abstract
We present software that facilitates quantitative comparisons of environmental niche models (ENMs). Our software quantifies similarity of ENMs generated using the program Maxent and uses randomization tests to compare observed similarity to that expected under different null hypotheses. ENMTools is available online free of charge from < http://purl.oclc.org/enmtools >.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multicollinearity between predictors was investigated using the ENMTools Correlation Pearson correlation coefficient.
“Multicollinearity between predictors was investigated using ENMTools Correlation Pearson correlation coefficient (Warren, Glor & Turelli 2010).”
From A maxent predictive model for hunter-gatherer sites in the southern pampas, argentina (2021) · cites this paper as Warren, Glor & Turelli 2010
Multicollinearity between predictors was investigated using ENMTools Correlation Pearson correlation coefficient.
“Multicollinearity between predictors was investigated using ENMTools Correlation Pearson correlation coefficient”
From A maxent predictive model for hunter-gatherer sites in the southern pampas, argentina (2021) · cites this paper as Warren, Glor & Turelli 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01858.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3349/ymj.2006.47.5.741 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03835.x · DOI
- 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[29:PAOTEO]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1155193 · DOI
- 10.1086/528754 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5203.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1935534 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00482.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Warren, D. L., & Seifert, S. N. (2011) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/10-1171.1 · Cited by 2,312
Self-citationDrastic population fluctuations explain the rapid extinction of the passenger pigeon
Hung, C.-M., Shaner, P.-J. L., Zink, R. M., Liu, W.-C., Chu, T.-C., Huang, W.-S., & Li, S.-H. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1401526111 · Cited by 186
Bouchet, P. J., & Meeuwig, J. J. (2015) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1890/es14-00380.1 · Cited by 59
Freeman, B., Roehrdanz, P. R., & Peterson, A. T. (2019) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-018-01684-6 · Cited by 38
New perspectives on the ecology of early domestic fowl: An interdisciplinary approach
Pitt, J., Gillingham, P. K., Maltby, M., & Stewart, J. R. (2016) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2016.08.004 · Cited by 31
A maxent predictive model for hunter-gatherer sites in the southern pampas, argentina
Rafuse, D. J. (2021) · Open Quaternary · doi:10.5334/oq.97 · Cited by 17
Abedin, I., Putra, A., Kang, H.-E., Singh, A., Singh, S., Jung, W.-K., Kim, H.-W., & Kundu, S. (2025) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7140563/v1 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Warren, D. L., Glor, R. E., & Turelli, M.
- Venue
- Ecography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 607-611
- ISSN
- 0906-7590
- 1600-0587
- Cited by
- 1,629
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
