Cited by 31Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesSpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeSoil and Environmental Studies

New perspectives on the ecology of early domestic fowl: An interdisciplinary approach

Open access
Pitt, Jacqueline, Gillingham, Phillipa K., Maltby, Mark, Stewart, John R.·2016·Journal of Archaeological Science

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jas.2016.08.004

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The domestic chicken originated from the red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus Linnaeus, 1758), native to tropical S/SE Asia.

    “The domestic chicken originated from the red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus Linnaeus, 1758), native to tropical S/SE Asia [19].”
  • Contemporary, non-indigenous red jungle fowl occur in the Americas, Australia, Europe and Africa due to deliberate human translocation, and are adapted to a much wider climatic range than indigenous birds.

    “Contemporary, non-indigenous red jungle fowl occur in the Americas, Australia, Europe and Africa, due to deliberate human translocation, and are adapted to a much wider climatic range than indigenous birds [19].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Baxter, S. H., Baxter, M. R. and MacCormack, J. A. C., 1983. Farm Animal Housing and Welfare. Vol. 24. Netherlands: Springer.
  2. Covington, R., 2013. Roads of Arabia. Saudi Aramco World, 64 (7), 2.
  3. Davis, S. J. M., 2006. Faunal remains from Alcáçova de Santarém, Portugal. Vol. 43. Lisbon: Instituto português de arqueologia.
  4. Hagberg, U. E., 1967. The archaeology of Skedemosse. In collaboration with Margareta Beskow. With geological and zoological contributions by Lars-König Königsson and Johannes Lepiksaar. Stockholm: The Royal Swedish Academy of Letters, History and Antiquities.
  5. Hamilton, J., 2000. Animal bones. In: Poole, B. C. a. C., ed. The Danebury environs programme : the prehistory of a Wessex landscape. Vol. 2, Part 6, Houghton Downs, Stockbridge, Hants, 1994. Oxford: University of Oxford, Committee for Archaeology, 67-73.
  6. Strid, L., 2015. Animal bone. In: P. Andrews, P. B., A. P. Fitzpatrick and K. Welsh, ed. Digging at the Gateway: archaeological landscapes of south Thanet. The Archaeology of East Kent Access (Phase II), Volume 2: The Finds, Environment and Dating Reports. Oxford: Oxford Archaeology, 444-460.
  7. Yuan, J., 2010. Zooarchaeological Study on the Domestic Animals in Ancient China. Quaternary Sciences, 30 (2), 298-306.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pitt, J., Gillingham, P. K., Maltby, M., & Stewart, J. R.
Affiliations
Bournemouth University (GB)
Corresponding author
Pitt, Jacqueline
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
74
Pages
1-10
ISSN
0305-4403 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2507747405
Cited by
31
References
47
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Archaeological Science (publishedVersion)
  • Bournemouth University Research Online (Bournemouth University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Bournemouth University
  • Arts and Humanities Research Council (AH/L006979/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil and Environmental Studies
Keywords
red junglefowl, Gallus gallus, ecological niche modeling, environmental tolerance, mid-Holocene climate, Bronze Age, Iron Age

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review