Cited by 437Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

Immune resistance orchestrated by the tumor microenvironment

Gajewski, Thomas F., Meng, Yuru, Blank, Christian, Brown, Ian, Kacha, Aalok, Kline, Justin, Harlin, Helena·2006·Immunological Reviews

Abstract

It is now little disputed that most if not all cancer cells express antigens that can be recognized by specific CD8(+) T lymphocytes. However, a central question in the field of anti-tumor immunity is why such antigen-expressing tumors are not spontaneously eliminated by the immune system. While in some cases, this lack of rejection may be due to immunologic ignorance, induction of anti-tumor T-cell responses in many patients has been detected in the peripheral blood, either spontaneously or in response to vaccination, without accompanying tumor rejection. These observations argue for the importance of barriers downstream from initial T-cell priming that need to be addressed to translate immune responses into clinical tumor regression. Recent data suggest that the proper trafficking of effector T cells into the tumor microenvironment may not always occur. T cells that do effectively home to tumor metastases are often found to be dysfunctional, pointing toward immunosuppressive mechanisms in the tumor microenvironment. T-cell anergy due to insufficient B7 costimulation, extrinsic suppression by regulatory cell populations, inhibition by ligands such as programmed death ligand-1, metabolic dysregulation by enzymes such as indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase, and the action of soluble inhibitory factors such as transforming growth factor-beta have all been clearly implicated in generating this suppressive microenvironment. Identification of these downstream processes points to new therapeutic targets that should be manipulated to facilitate the effector phase of anti-tumor immune responses in concert with vaccination or T-cell adoptive transfer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-065x.2006.00442.x

Cites

152 of 152 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gajewski, T. F., Meng, Y., Blank, C., Brown, I., Kacha, A., Kline, J., & Harlin, H.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Gajewski, Thomas F.
Venue
Immunological Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-09-14
Volume
213
Issue
1
Pages
131-145
ISSN
  • 0105-2896 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-065X
OpenAlex
W2114601875
Cited by
437
References
152
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 31
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Immunological Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Burroughs Wellcome Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
tumor immune resistance, tumor microenvironment, antitumor immunity, CD8+ T cells, T cell migration, T cell anergy, B7 costimulation, regulatory T cells, PD-L1, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase, TGF-beta, immunosuppression, cancer vaccination, adoptive T cell therapy, tumor regression
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Immune Tolerance, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasms, T-Lymphocytes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review