The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intestinal microflora in early infancy: composition and development
Abstract
The neonatal intestinal microbiota is a complex ecosystem composed of numerous genera, species and strains of bacteria. This enormous cell mass performs a variety of unique activities that affect both the colonic and systemic physiology. Its primary activities include nutritive, metabolic, immunological and protective functions. Most studies of infants have been based on faecal samples using the classical plating techniques with culturing on specific media. The limitations of these methods must be taken into account when evaluating the varying results of the different studies. The establishment of the gut microbial population is not strictly a succession in the ecological sense; it is rather a complex process influenced by microbial and host interactions and by external and internal factors. The climax intestinal flora is attained in successive stages. The foetal intestine is sterile and bathed in swallowed amniotic fluid. Following delivery, multiple different antigens challenge the intestine of the newborn. The maternal intestinal flora is a source of bacteria for the neonatal gut. The bacterial flora is usually heterogeneous during the first few days of life, independently of feeding habits. After the first week of life, a stable bacterial flora is usually established. In full‐term infants a diet of breast milk induces the development of a flora rich in Bifidobacterium spp. Other obligate anaerobes, such as Clostridium spp. and Bacteroides spp., are more rarely isolated and also enterobacteria and enterococci are relatively few. During the corresponding period, formula‐fed babies are often colonized by other anaerobes in addition to bifidobacteria and by facultatively anaerobic bacteria; the development of a “bifidus flora” is unusual. In other studies the presence of a consistent number of bifidobacteria in infants delivered in large urban hospitals has not been demonstrated, whether the babies were bottle fed or exclusively breastfed. The predominant faecal bacteria were coliforms and bacteroides. According to these studies, environmental factors may be more important than breastfeeding in gut colonization after delivery. Environmental factors are indeed extremely important for the intestinal colonization of infants born by caesarean section. In these infants, the establishment of a stable flora characterized by a low incidence of Bacteroides spp. and by the isolation of few other bacteria is consistently delayed. In extremely low‐birthweight infants, hospitalization in neonatal intensive care units, characterized by prolonged antibiotic therapy, parenteral nutrition, delayed oral feedings and intubation seems to affect the composition of the intestinal microbiota. The gut is colonized by a small number of bacterial species;Lactobacillus and Bifidobacteria spp. are seldom, if ever, identified. According to the few studies so far performed, the predominant species are Enterococcus faecalis, E. coli, Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus.Hygienic conditions and antimicrobial procedures strongly influence the intestinal colonization pattern.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stark, P. L., & Lee, A. (1982) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00222615-15-2-189 · Cited by 616
Yoshioka, H., Iseki, K.-I., & Fujita, K. (1983) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.72.3.317 · Cited by 516
Diet and faecal flora in the newborn: breast milk and infant formula
Balmer, S. E., & Wharton, B. A. (1989) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/adc.64.12.1672 · Cited by 254
Cited by
Development of the Human Infant Intestinal Microbiota
Palmer, C., Bik, E. M., DiGiulio, D. B., Relman, D. A., & Brown, P. O. (2007) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050177 · Cited by 2,877
Epithelial-cell recognition of commensal bacteria and maintenance of immune homeostasis in the gut
Artis, D. (2008) · Nature reviews. Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2316 · Cited by 1,136
Long-term impacts of antibiotic exposure on the human intestinal microbiota
Jernberg, C., Löfmark, S., Edlund, C., & Jansson, J. K. (2010) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.040618-0 · Cited by 1,067
Gut microorganisms, mammalian metabolism and personalized health care
Nicholson, J. K., Holmes, E., & Wilson, I. D. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1152 · Cited by 945
Correlation between intraluminal oxygen gradient and radial partitioning of intestinal microbiota
Albenberg, L., Esipova, T. V., Judge, C. P., Bittinger, K., Chen, J., Laughlin, A., Grunberg, S., Baldassano, R. N., Lewis, J. D., Li, H., et al. (2014) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2014.07.020 · Cited by 886
Metadata
- Authors
- Fanaro, S., Chierici, R., Guerrini, P., & Vigi, V
- Venue
- Acta Paediatrica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- s441
- Pages
- 48-55
- ISSN
- 0365-1436 (ISSN-L)
- 0803-5253
- 1651-2227
- OpenAlex
- W2037165584
- Cited by
- 698
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intestinal microflora in early infancy: composition and development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2003.tb00646.x
- The paper
- Fanaro, S., Chierici, R., Guerrini, P., & Vigi, V. (2003). Intestinal microflora in early infancy: composition and development. Acta Paediatrica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2003.tb00646.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.