Cited by 60Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressStress Responses and CortisolTryptophan and brain disorders

Effects of Fluoxetine on the Oxidative Status of Peripheral Blood Leucocytes of Restraint-Stressed Mice: FLUOXETINE, OXIDATIVE STRESS AND LEUCOCYTES

Novío, Silvia, Núñez, María Jesús, Amigo, Gonzalo, Freire-Garabal, Manuel·2011·Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology

Abstract

Emotional stress can be viewed as a cause of adverse circumstances that induces a wide range of biochemical and behavioural changes. Oxidative stress is a critical route of damage in various psychological stress-induced disorders such as depression. Antidepressants are widely prescribed to treat these conditions; however, no animal study has investigated the effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on the levels of intracellular reactive oxygen species in peripheral blood leucocytes of stressed mice. In this study, mice were immobilized for a period of 6 hr. Fluoxetine (5 mg/kg of body-weight) was administered 30 min. before subjecting the animals to acute stress. The level of intracellular reactive oxygen species in leucocytes of the peripheral blood of stressed mice was investigated using a 2',7'-dichlorofluorescein diacetate probe, and the antioxidant response of fluoxetine was evaluated by superoxide dismutase, diaphorase, catalase and reduced glutathione. Our results show that restraint stress significantly increases the generation of reactive oxygen species in the peripheral defence cells. Treatment with fluoxetine partially reverses the adverse effects of stress. The improvement in cellular oxidative status may be an important mechanism underlying the protective pharmacological effects of fluoxetine, which are clinically observed in the treatment of depressive disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2011.00736.x

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Novío, S., Núñez, M. J., Amigo, G., & Freire-Garabal, M.
Affiliations
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES)
Venue
Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-06-22
Volume
109
Issue
5
Pages
365-371
ISSN
1742-7835 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1502932546
Cited by
60
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
Keywords
fluoxetine, restraint stress, oxidative stress, reactive oxygen species, peripheral blood leukocytes, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, antioxidant enzymes, superoxide dismutase, catalase, reduced glutathione, diaphorase, depression, antidepressants
MeSH terms
Animals, Antioxidants, Catalase, Fluoresceins, Fluoxetine, Glutathione, Immobilization, Leukocytes, Male, Stress, Psychological, Superoxide Dismutase, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Reactive Oxygen Species, Oxidative Stress, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review