The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
META‐ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE FIVE‐FACTOR MODEL OF PERSONALITY AND HOLLAND'S OCCUPATIONAL TYPES
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the nature and magnitude of the relationship between 2 widely accepted models for classifying individual differences–the 5‐factor model of personality and Holland's RI‐ASEC occupational types. Based on extensive meta‐analyses, our results illustrate that there are meaningful relations between some FFM personality dimensions and some RIASEC types. The strongest relationships were obtained between the RIASEC types of enterprising and artistic with the FFM personality dimensions of Extraversion and Openness to Experience, p= .41 and .39, respectively. Three other RIASEC types had moderate correlations with at least 1 FFM personality trait. In contrast, the realistic type was not related to any FFM personality traits. Multiple regression analyses in which each RIASEC type is regressed on the FFM scores (based on meta‐analytic estimates), revealed a multiple R of .11 for realistic, .26 for investigative, .42 for artistic, .31 for social, .47 for enterprising, and .27 for conventional types. The overall conclusion from the study is that although FFM personality traits and RIASEC types are related, they are not merely substitutes for each other.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689
Self-citationMethods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure
Goldberg, L. R. (1992) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26 · Cited by 5,530
The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review.
Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376 · Cited by 4,760
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00160 · Cited by 2,356
Self-citationIntelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits
Ackerman, P. L., & Heggestad, E. D. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.2.219 · Cited by 1,829
Temperament, personality, and the mood and anxiety disorders.
Clark, L. A., Watson, D., & Mineka, S. (1994) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.103.1.103 · Cited by 1,685
Personality measurement and employment decisions: Questions and answers.
Hogan, R., Hogan, J., & Roberts, B. W. (1996) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.51.5.469 · Cited by 572
Cited by
HIGHER‐ORDER DIMENSIONS OF THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY TRAITS AND THE BIG SIX VOCATIONAL INTEREST TYPES
MOUNT, M. K., BARRICK, M. R., SCULLEN, S. M., & ROUNDS, J. (2005) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00468.x · Cited by 463
Self-citationPutting the art in artificial: Aesthetic responses to computer-generated art.
Chamberlain, R., Mullin, C., Scheerlinck, B., & Wagemans, J. (2018) · Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts · doi:10.1037/aca0000136 · Cited by 225
An Intimate Portrait of the Individual Investor
Durand, R. B., Newby, R., & Sanghani, J. (2008) · Journal of Behavioral Finance · doi:10.1080/15427560802341020 · Cited by 219
The Future Cybersecurity Workforce: Going Beyond Technical Skills for Successful Cyber Performance
Dawson, J., & Thomson, R. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00744 · Cited by 174
Holland's RIASEC model as an integrative framework for individual differences.
Armstrong, P. I., Day, S. X., McVay, J. P., & Rounds, J. (2008) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.55.1.1 · Cited by 136
Agreeableness and Its Consequences: A Quantitative Review of Meta-Analytic Findings
Wilmot, M. P., & Ones, D. S. (2022) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/10888683211073007 · Cited by 130
Trait emotional intelligence profiles of students from different university faculties
Sánchez-Ruiz, M. J., Pérez-González, J. C., & Petrides, K. V. (2010) · Australian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00049530903312907 · Cited by 110
Vocational interests and dark personality: Are there dark career choices?
Kowalski, C. M., Vernon, P. A., & Schermer, J. A. (2017) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.029 · Cited by 64
Park, H. (., Wiernik, B. M., Oh, I.-S., Gonzalez-Mulé, E., Ones, D. S., & Lee, Y. (2020) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000476 · Cited by 57
The Roles of Personality Traits and Vocational Interests in Explaining What People Want Out of Life
Stoll, G., Einarsdóttir, S., Song, Q. C., Ondish, P., Sun, J. J., & Rounds, J. (2020) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103939 · Cited by 38
Developmental structure of personality and interests: A four-wave, 8-year longitudinal study.
Hoff, K. A., Song, Q. C., Einarsdóttir, S., Briley, D. A., & Rounds, J. (2020) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000228 · Cited by 32
An Analysis of the Relation between Personality and the Attractiveness of Total Rewards Components
Vandenberghe, C., St-Onge, S., & Robineau, É. (2008) · Relations industrielles · doi:10.7202/019096ar · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- BARRICK, M. R., MOUNT, M. K., & GUPTA, R.
- Venue
- Personnel Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-74
- ISSN
- 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-6570
- OpenAlex
- W2132681024
- Cited by
- 483
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 10.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
