The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
INTEGRATING ERRORS INTO THE TRAINING PROCESS: THE FUNCTION OF ERROR MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTIONS AND THE ROLE OF GOAL ORIENTATION
Abstract
Error management training explicitly allows participants to make errors. We examined the effects of error management instructions (“rules of thumb” designed to reduce the negative emotional effects of errors), goal orientation (learning goal, prove goal, and avoidance goal orientations) and attribute x treatment interactions on performance. A randomized experiment with 87 participants consisting of 3 training procedures for learning to work with a computer program was conducted: (a) error training with error management instructions, (b) error training without error management instructions; and (c) a group that was prevented from making errors. Results showed that short‐and medium‐term performance (near and far transfer) was superior for participants of the error training that included error management instructions, compared with the two other training conditions. Thus, error management instructions were crucial for the high performance effects of error training. Prove and avoidance goal orientation interacted with training conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.256 · Cited by 9,745
Levels of processing: A framework for memory research
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(72)80001-x · Cited by 9,566
The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.363 · Cited by 9,564
Motivational processes affecting learning.
Dweck, C. S. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.10.1040 · Cited by 6,971
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 · Cited by 5,882
The unbearable automaticity of being
Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.7.462 · Cited by 3,699 · cited 1×
“to think about them) ( Bargh & Chartrand, 1999; Kahneman, 1973).”
Cited by
Transfer of Training: A Meta-Analytic Review
Blume, B. D., Ford, J. K., Baldwin, T. T., & Huang, J. L. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309352880 · Cited by 1,477
A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net.
Payne, S. C., Youngcourt, S. S., & Beaubien, J. M. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.128 · Cited by 1,242
The transfer of training: what really matters
Grossman, R., & Salas, E. (2011) · International Journal of Training and Development · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2419.2011.00373.x · Cited by 886
Moving from cognition to behavior: What the research says.
Johnson, R. E., Chang, C.-H., & Lord, R. G. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.381 · Cited by 193
Learning from Errors: A Model of Individual Processes
Tulis, M., Steuer, G., & Dresel, M. (2016) · Frontline Learning Research · doi:10.14786/flr.v4i2.168 · Cited by 135
Action Regulation Theory: Foundations, Current Knowledge and Future Directions
Zacher, H., & Frese, M. (2018) · The SAGE Handbook of Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology · doi:10.4135/9781473914957.n7 · Cited by 124
Self-citationBischoff, K. M., Gielnik, M. M., & Frese, M. (2020) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1364 · Cited by 64
Grassinger, R., & Dresel, M. (2017) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.11.009 · Cited by 47
Hempel, B., Kiehlbaugh, K., & Blowers, P. (2020) · Education for Chemical Engineers · doi:10.1016/j.ece.2020.07.004 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- HEIMBECK, D., FRESE, M., SONNENTAG, S., & KEITH, N.
- Venue
- Personnel Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 333-361
- ISSN
- 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-6570
- OpenAlex
- W2145184531
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 12.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
