Cited by 126Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismDysphagia Assessment and Management

Very Early Poststroke Aphasia Therapy: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Efficacy Trial

Godecke, Erin, Hird, Kathryn, Lalor, Erin E., Rai, Tapan, Phillips, Michael R.·2012·International Journal of Stroke

Abstract

Background and purpose: Early stroke rehabilitation has shown benefits over spontaneous recovery. Insufficient evidence exists to determine the benefits of early aphasia intervention. We hypothesized that daily aphasia therapy would show better communication outcomes than usual care (UC) in early poststroke recovery. Method: This prospective, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial was conducted in three acute-care hospitals in Perth, Australia, each with over 200 stroke admissions annually. Patients with acute stroke causing moderate to severe aphasia were recruited at a median of three-days (range: 0–10 days) to receive daily aphasia therapy or usual care therapy. Individually tailored, impairment-based intervention was provided for the acute hospital stay or intervention phase (median: 19 days; range: 5–76). Primary outcome measures were the aphasia quotient and functional communication profile at acute hospital discharge or four-weeks poststroke, whichever came first. A random-number generator and sealed envelopes were used to randomize participants. Assessments were completed by a blinded assessor. Results: Fifty-nine participants were recruited, with six withdrawals (10%) and seven deaths (12%) at six-months. Ninety percent had ischemic strokes, with 56·5% experiencing a total anterior circulation stroke. The group mean (±SD) age was 69·1 (±13·9) years. Six participants (18·75%) in the daily aphasia therapy group did not complete the minimum (150 min) therapy required for this study. The daily aphasia therapy intervention phase mean therapy session time was 45 min (range: 30–80) and the total mean amount of therapy for the daily aphasia therapy participants was 331 min (range: 30–1415). Four (15%) participants in the usual care group received therapy. The collective total therapy provided to these participants was 295 min over seven sessions. Usual care participants received an average of 10·5 min of therapy per week during the intervention phase. At the primary end point, a generalized estimating equations model demonstrated that after controlling for initial aphasia severity, participants receiving daily aphasia therapy scored 15·1 more points ( P = 0·010) on the aphasia quotient and 11·3 more points ( P = 0·004) on the functional communication profile than those receiving usual care therapy. Conclusions: Daily aphasia therapy in very early stroke recovery improved communication outcomes in people with moderate to severe aphasia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2011.00631.x

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Godecke, E., Hird, K., Lalor, E. E., Rai, T., & Phillips, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Edith Cowan University (AU)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • National Stroke Foundation (AU)
Corresponding author
Godecke, Erin
Venue
International Journal of Stroke
Published
2011-10-06
Volume
7
Issue
8
Pages
635-644
ISSN
  • 1747-4930 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-4949
OpenAlex
W2002631337
Cited by
126
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline@ND (The University of Notre Dame) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Online (Edith Cowan University) (submittedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Keywords
aphasia, stroke rehabilitation, acute stroke, aphasia rehabilitation, functional communication, aphasia quotient, communication outcomes, ischemic stroke, anterior circulation stroke, hospital discharge outcomes, medication adherence, aphasia severity
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Aged, Aphasia, Female, Humans, Language Therapy, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Patient Compliance, Pilot Projects, Prospective Studies, Western Australia, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review