Cited by 387Obesity, Physical Activity, DietPhysical Activity and HealthObesity and Health Practices

Obesity and Physical Inactivity in Rural America

Patterson, Paul Daniel, Moore, Charity G., Probst, Janice C., Shinogle, Judith Ann·2004·The Journal of Rural Health

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Context and Purpose: Obesity and physical inactivity are common in the United States, but few studies examine this issue within rural populations. The present study uses nationally representative data to study obesity and physical inactivity in rural populations. Methods: Data came from the 1998 National Health Interview Survey Sample Adult and Adult Prevention Module. Self‐reported height and weight were used to calculate body mass index. Physical inactivity was defined using self‐reported leisure‐time physical activity. Analyses included descriptive statistics, x 2 tests, and logistic regression. Findings: Obesity was more common among rural (20.4%, 95% CI 19.2%–21.6%) than urban adults (17.8%, 95% CI 17.2%–18.4%). Rural residents of every racial/ethnic group were at higher risk of obesity than urban whites, other factors held equal. Other predictors of obesity included being male, age 25–74, lacking a high school diploma, having physical limitations, fair to poor health, and a history of smoking. Proportionately more rural adults were physically inactive than their urban peers (62.8% versus 59.3%). Among rural residents, minorities were not significantly more likely to be inactive than whites. Males and younger adults were less likely to be inactive. Rural adults who were from the Midwest and South, had less than a high school education, had fair to poor health, and currently smoked were more likely to be inactive compared to their respective referent group. Conclusions: The high prevalence of obesity and inactive lifestyles among rural populations call for research into effective rural interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2004.tb00022.x

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patterson, P. D., Moore, C. G., Probst, J. C., & Shinogle, J. A.
Affiliations
University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Patterson, Paul Daniel
Venue
The Journal of Rural Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-03
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
151-159
ISSN
  • 0890-765X (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-0361
OpenAlex
W2098748795
Cited by
387
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 24
FWCI
9.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Rural Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina) (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (1 U1C RH 00045-02)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
obesity, physical inactivity, rural population, urban-rural differences, body mass index, leisure-time physical activity, smoking, educational attainment, health status, racial and ethnic disparities
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Obesity, Rural Health, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Urban Health, Body Mass Index, Prevalence, Logistic Models, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review