Cited by 730Physical Activity and HealthUrban Transport and AccessibilityHealth disparities and outcomes

Differential correlates of physical activity in urban and rural adults of various socioeconomic backgrounds in the United States

Open access
Parks, S E, Housemann, R A, Brownson, R C·2003·Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Abstract

Study objectives: Few studies have analysed the rates and correlates of physical activity in economically and geographically diverse populations. Objectives were to examine: (1) urban-rural differences in physical activity by several demographic, geographical, environmental, and psychosocial variables, (2) patterns in environmental and policy factors across urban-rural setting and socioeconomic groups, (3) socioeconomic differences in physical activity across the same set of variables, and (4) possible correlations of these patterns with meeting of physical activity recommendations. Design: A cross sectional study with an over sampling of lower income adults was conducted in 1999–2000. Setting: United States. Participants: 1818 United States adults. Main results: Lower income residents were less likely than higher income residents to meet physical activity recommendations. Rural residents were least likely to meet recommendations; suburban residents were most likely to meet recommendations. Suburban, higher income residents were more than twice as likely to meet recommendations than rural, lower income residents. Significant differences across income levels and urban/rural areas were found for those reporting neighbourhood streets, parks, and malls as places to exercise; fear of injury, being in poor health, or dislike as barriers to exercise and those reporting encouragement from relatives as social support for exercise. Evidence of a positive dose-response relation emerged between number of places to exercise and likelihood to meet recommendations for physical activity. Conclusions: Both income level and urban rural status were important predictors of adults’ likelihood to meet physical activity recommendations. In addition, environmental variables vary in importance across socioeconomic status and urban-rural areas.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jech.57.1.29

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In prior studies, rural adults were less likely to meet physical activity recommendations than urban adults.

    “In contrast, the 1998 NHIS6 and 2 national physical activity surveys conducted in the late 1990s based on modified BRFSS physical activity items21,22 showed rural adults were less likely to meet physical activity recommendations than urban adults.”
  • Compared with rural and lower-income residents, suburban and higher-income residents more often meet physical activity recommendations, because they have better access to parks, sidewalks, and malls and less fear of injury or safety concerns.

    “Suburban, higher income residents are more likely to achieve PA recommendations compared to rural, lower income residents due to accessibility of exercise spaces such as parks, sidewalks, and malls, as well as decreased fear of injury or concern for safety.120”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sallis JF, Bauman A, Pratt M. Environmental and policy interventions to promote physical activity. Am J Prev Med 1998;15:379-97.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parks, S. E., Housemann, R. A., & Brownson, R. C.
Affiliations
Saint Louis University (US)
Corresponding author
Brownson, R C
Venue
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2003-01
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
29-35
ISSN
  • 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
  • 0143-005X
  • 1470-2738
OpenAlex
W2159967140
Cited by
730
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 41
FWCI
8.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U48/CCU 710806)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
physical activity, urban-rural differences, socioeconomic status, income, rural health, physical activity guidelines, barriers to exercise, exercise social support, built environment, dose-response relationship
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Rural Health, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Urban Health, Exercise, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review