Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 231

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Brain Reward Circuitry in the Human

BREITER, HANS C., ROSEN, BRUCE R.·1999·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

ABSTRACT: To produce behavior, motivational states necessitate at least three fundamental operations, including (1) selection of objectives focused on goal‐objects, (2) compilation of goal‐object information, and (3) determination of physical plans for securing goal‐objects. The second of these general operations has been theorized to involve three subprocesses: (a) feature detection and other perceptual processing of putative goal‐object “rewards,” (b) valuation of goal‐object worth in the context of potential hedonic deficit states, and (c) extraction of incidence and temporal data regarding the goal‐object. A number of subcortical brain regions appear to be involved in these three informational subprocesses, in particular, the amygdala, sublenticular extended amygdala (SLEA) of the basal forebrain, and nucleus accumbens/subcallosal cortex (NAc/SCC). Components of the amygdala, SLEA, and NAc/SCC together constitute the larger anatomic structure of the extended amygdala. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of humans have recently begun to localize these subcortical regions within the extended amygdala during specific experimental conditions. In this manuscript, two human cocaine‐ infusion studies and one cognitive psychology experiment are reviewed in relation to their pattern of fMRI activation within regions of the extended amygdala. Activation in the NAc/SCC, in particular, is evaluated in relation to a hypothesis that one function of the NAc/SCC and associated brain regions is the evaluation of goal‐object incidence data for the computation of conditional probabilities regarding goal‐object availability. Further work is warranted to test hypothesized functions for all regions within the extended amygdala and integrate them toward an understanding of motivated behavior.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09287.x

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 231

Metadata

Authors
BREITER, H. C., & ROSEN, B. R.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-06
Volume
877
Issue
1
Pages
523-547
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2054139541
Cited by
231
References
12
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Brain Reward Circuitry in the Human. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09287.x
The paper
BREITER, H. C., & ROSEN, B. R. (1999). Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Brain Reward Circuitry in the Human. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09287.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.