CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 77Social and Intergroup PsychologySocial Power and Status DynamicsCareer Development and Diversity

The Beneficial Effects of Social Identity Protection on the Performance Motivation of Members of Devalued Groups

Open access
Derks, Belle, Van Laar, Colette, Ellemers, Naomi·2007·Social Issues and Policy Review
DOI 10.1111/j.1751-2409.2007.00008.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

For members of socially devalued or stigmatized groups, work and educational settings can threaten social identity, inducing the use of coping strategies that lower their motivation (e.g., self‐segregation, domain disengagement) rather than improving their position in the social hierarchy. We review a recent research program on women and ethnic minorities to show that members of these stigmatized groups can maintain their motivation in threatening work and educational contexts when they are offered ways to protect their social identity. For example, organizations that communicate value for the social identities of women and ethnic minorities allow members of these groups to focus on success and motivate them to improve their performance on dimensions that increase their social status. Furthermore, social identity protection has important benefits over more individualistic forms of identity protection because it maintains group members' concern for their group's plight, increasing opportunities for successful collective action. The practical implications of this work are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1751-2409.2007.00008.x

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Members of negatively stereotyped groups are more highly motivated to be successful when they are in organizations that visibly value their social identities.

    “members of negatively stereotyped groups are more highly motivated to be successful when they are in organizations that visibly value their social identities (Derks, Van Laar, & Ellemers, 2007).”

    From Tackling Educational Inequalities with Social Psychology: Identities, Contexts, and Interventions (2021) · cites this paper as Derks, Van Laar, & Ellemers, 2007

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 107

  1. Ambady, N., Paik, S. K., Steele, J., Owen Smith, A., & Mitchell, J. P. (2004). Deflecting negative self-relevant stereotype activation: The effects of individuation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 401-408.
  2. Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (in press). Multiple identities and the paradox of social inclusion. In F. Butera & J. M. Levine (Eds.), Coping with minority status: Responses to exclusion and inclusion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Barrette, G., Bourhis, R. Y., Personnaz, M., & Personnaz, B. (2004). Acculturation orientations of French and North African undergraduates in Paris. International Journal of Intercultural Re- lations, 28, 415-438.
  4. Baum, S. K. (1983). Age identification in the elderly: Some theoretical considerations. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 18, 25-30.
  5. Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46, 5-34.
  6. Berry, J. W. (2001). A psychology of immigration. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 615-631.
  7. Blaine, B., Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1995). The unintended negative consequences of sympathy for the stigmatized. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 889-905.
  8. Blanton, H., Christie, C., & Dye, M. (2002). Social identity versus reference frame comparisons: The moderating role of stereotype endorsement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 253-267.
  9. Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1996). The biopsychosocial model of arousal regulation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 1-51). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  10. Bourhis, R. Y., Moise, L. C., Perreault, S., & Senecal, S. (1997). Towards an interactive acculturation model: A social psychological approach. International Journal of Psychology, 32, 369-386.
  11. Branscombe, N. R., & Ellemers, N. (1998). Coping with group-based discrimination: Individualistic versus group-level strategies. In J. K. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The target's perspective (pp. 243-266). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  12. Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., & Harvey, R. D. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 135-149.
  13. Brief, A. P., & Barsky, A. (2000). Establishing a climate for diversity: The inhibition of prejudiced reactions in the workplace. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 19, pp. 91-129). Stamford, CT: Elsevier Science.
  14. Cadinu, M. R., & Cerchioni, M. (2001). Compensatory biases after ingroup threat: 'yeah, but we have a good personality'. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 353-367.
  15. Chemers, M. M., Oskamp, S., & Costanzo, M. A. (Eds.). (1995). Diversity in organizations: New perspectives for a changing workplace. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
  16. Cohen, L. L., & Swim, J. K. (1995). The differential impact of gender ratios on women and men: Tokenism, self-confidence, and expectations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 876-884.
  17. Crisp, R. J., & Hewstone, M. (2006). Multiple social categorization: Processes, models and applica- tions. New York: Psychology Press.
  18. Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608-630.
  19. Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. (1998). Social stigma. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 504-553). Boston: Mcgraw-Hill.
  20. In T. F. Heatherton, R. E. Kleck & et al. (Eds.), The social psychology of stigma (pp. 153-183). New York: The Guilford Press.
  21. Crocker, J., Voelkl, K., Testa, M., & Major, B. (1991). Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 218-228.
  22. Croizet, J. C., & Claire, T. (1998). Extending the concept of stereotype and threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 588-594.
  23. Crosby, F. (1982). Relative deprivation and working women. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  24. Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women's leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 276-287.
  25. Depla, M. F. I. A., de Graaf, R., van Weeghel, J., & Heeren, T. J. (2005). The role of stigma in the quality of life of older adults with severe mental illness. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 20, 146-153.
  26. Derks, B., Van Laar, C., & Ellemers, N. (2007a). Social creativity strikes back: Improving motivated performance of low-status group members by valuing ingroup dimensions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 470-493.
  27. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105-121). New York: Guilford Publications.
  28. Eccles, J. S., Barber, B., & Jozefowicz, D. (1999). Linking gender to educational, occupational, and recreational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. Model of achievement-related choices. In W. B. Swann, Jr. & J. H. Langlois (Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes in modern society: The gender science of Janet Taylor Spence (pp. 153-192). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  29. Eccles, J. S., Wong, C. A., & Peck, S. C. (2006). Ethnicity as a social context for the development of African-American adolescents. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 407-426.
  30. Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity management strategies. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 27-57): John Wiley & Sons.
  31. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 205-222). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  32. Ellemers, N. (2002). Social identity and relative deprivation. In I. Walker (Ed.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 239-264). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  33. Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2001). The impact of relative group status: Affective, perceptual and behavioral consequences. In R. Brown & S. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 324-343). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
  34. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 127-146). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.
  35. Ellemers, N., Doosje, B., & Spears, R. (2004). Sources of respect: The effects of being liked by ingroups and outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 155-172.
  36. Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together of falling apart: In-group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 617-626.
  37. Ellemers, N., Van Den Heuvel, H., De Gilder, D., Maass, A., & Bonvini, A. (2004). The underrepre- sentation of women in science: Differential commitment or the queen bee syndrome? British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 315-338.
  38. Ellemers, N., & Van Knippenberg, A. (1997). Stereotyping in social context. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 208-235). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
  39. Ellemers, N., & Van Laar, C. (in press). Individual mobility: The opportunities and challenges members of devalued groups encounter when trying to avoid group-based discrimination. In J. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick & V. Esses (Eds.), Handbook of prejudice and discrimination. London: Sage.
  40. Ellemers, N., & Van Rijswijk, W. (1997). Identity needs versus social opportunities: The use of group- level and individual-level identity management strategies. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 52-65.
  41. Ellemers, N., Van Rijswijk, W., Roefs, M., & Simons, C. (1997). Bias in intergroup perceptions: Balancing group identity with social reality. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 186-198.
  42. Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232.
  43. Esses, V. M., Dovidio, J. F., Jackson, L. M., & Armstrong, T. L. (2001). The immigration dilemma: The role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 389-412.
  44. In N. R. Goldberger & J. B. Veroff (Eds.), The culture and psychology reader (pp. 536-558). New York: New York University Press.
  45. Gurin, P., Dey, E. L., Hurtado, S., & Gurin, G. (2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 330-366.
  46. Gurin, P., Nagda, B. A., & Lopez, G. E. (2004). The benefits of diversity in education for democratic citizenship. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 17-34.
  47. Haslam, S. A., O'Brien, A., Jetten, J., Vormedal, K., & Penna, S. (2005). Taking the strain: Social identity, social support, and the experience of stress. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 355-370.
  48. Heatherton, T. F., Kleck, R. E., Hebl, M. R., & Hull, J. G. (Eds.). (2000). The social psychology of stigma. New York: The Guilford Press.
  49. Herek, G. M. (2003). Why tell if you're not asked? Self-disclosure, intergroup contact, and heterosex- uals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. In L. D. Garnets (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on lesbian, gay, and bisexual experiences (2nd ed. pp. 270-298). New York: Columbia Uni- versity Press. xiv.
  50. Higgins, E. T., Shah, J., & Friedman, R. (1997). Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 515- 525.
  51. Hinkle, S., Taylor, L. A., Fox Cardamone, L., & Ely, P. G. (1998). Social identity and aspects of social creativity: Shifting to new dimensions of intergroup comparison. In S. Worchel & J. F. Morales. (Eds.), Social identity: International perspectives (pp. 166-179). London: Sage Publications.
  52. Inzlicht, M., Aronson, J., Good, C., & McKay, L. (2006). A particular resiliency to threatening environments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 323-336.
  53. Inzlicht, M., & Good, C. (2006). How environments can threaten academic performance, self- knowledge, and sense of belonging. In S. Levin & C. van Laar. (Eds.), Stigma and group inequality: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 129-150). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  54. Johns, M. (2005). Examining the role of anxiety avoidance in the effect of stereotype threat on working memory capacity. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.
  55. Kelman, H. C. (2001). The role of national identity in conflict resolution: Experiences from Israeli- Palestinian problem-solving workshops. In R. D. Ashmore, L. Jussim & D. Wilder. (Eds.), Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict reduction (pp. 187-212). New York: Oxford University Press.
  56. Knight, J. L. (2004). Falling into debt, feeling out-group threat, and going to work upset: The influence of economic threat on attitudes toward organizational diversity policies. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Rice University, Houston, Texas.
  57. Kray, L. J., Thompson, L., & Galinsky, A. (2001). Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 942-958.
  58. Kurman, J., Eshel, Y., & Sbeit, K. (2005). Acculturation attitudes, perceived attitudes of the majority, and adjustment of Israeli-Arab and Jewish-Ethiopian students to an Israeli university. Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 593-612.
  59. Lemaine, G., Kasterztein, J., & Personnaz, B. (1978). Social differentiation. In H. Tajfel. (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 269-300). London: Academic Press.
  60. Levin, S., & Van Laar, C. (Eds.), (2006). Stigma and group inequality: Social psychological perspec- tives. Claremont, CA, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  61. Levin, S., Van Laar, C., & Foote, W. (2006). Ethnic segregation and perceived discrimination in college: Mutual influences and effects on social and academic life. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 1471-1501.
  62. Lindsley, S. L. (1998). Organizational interventions to prejudice. In M. Hecht. (Ed.), Communicating prejudice (pp. 302-310). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  63. Major, B. (1989). Gender differences in comparisons and entitlement: Implications for comparable worth. Journal of Social Issues, 45, 99-115.
  64. Major, B., Crocker, J., & Sciacchitano, A. M. (1993). In-group versus out-group comparisons and self-esteem. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(6), 711-721.
  65. Major, B., & Forcey, B. (1985). Social comparisons and pay evaluations: Preferences for same-sex and same-job wage comparisons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 393-405.
  66. Major, B., & Schmader, T. (1998). Coping with stigma through psychological disengagement. In J. K. Swim & C. Stangor. (Eds.), Prejudice: The target's perspective. (pp. 219-241). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  67. Major, B., Spencer, S., Schmader, T., Wolfe, C., & Crocker, J. (1998). Coping with negative stereotypes about intellectual performance: The role of psychological disengagement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 34-50.
  68. Marx, D. M., & Roman, J. S. (2002). Female role models: Protecting women's math test performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1183-1193.
  69. Matheson, K., & Cole, B. M. (2004). Coping with a threatened group identity: Psychoso- cial and neuroendocrine responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 777- 786.
  70. McGregor, H. A., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Achievement goals as predictors of achievement-relevant processes prior to task engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 381-395.
  71. McGuire, W. J., McGuire, C. V., Child, P., & Fujioka, T. (1978). Salience of ethnicity in the spontaneous self-concept as a function of one's ethnic distinctiveness in the social environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 511-520.
  72. McGuire, W. J., McGuire, C. V., & Winton, W. (1979). Effects of household sex composition on the salience of one's gender in the spontaneous self-concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 77-90.
  73. McGuire, W. J., & Padawer Singer, A. (1976). Trait salience in the spontaneous self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 743-754.
  74. Myers, A. M., & Rothblum, E. D. (2005). Coping with prejudice and discrimination based on weight. In J. L. Chin. (Ed.), The psychology of prejudice and discrimination: Disability, religion, physique, and other traits (Vol. 4, pp. 112-134). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group.
  75. Osborne, J. W. (1995). Academics, self-esteem, and race: A look at the underlying assumptions of the disidentification hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 449-455.
  76. Ouwerkerk, J. W., De Gilder, D., & De Vries, N. K. (2000). When the going gets tough, the tough get going: Social identification and individual effort in intergroup competition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1550-1559.
  77. Ouwerkerk, J. W., Ellemers, N., & De Gilder, D. (1999). Group commitment and individual effort in experimental and organizational contexts. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears & B. Doosje. (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 184-204). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.
  78. Phinney, J. S., Horenczyk, G., Liebkind, K., & Vedder, P. (2001). Ethnic identity, immigration, and well-being: An interactional perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 493-510.
  79. Purdie Vaughns, V. J. (2004). Identity contingency threat: The impact of circumstantial cues on African- Americans' trust in diverse settings. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford University.
  80. Quinn, D. M., & Crocker, J. (1998). Vulnerability to the affective consequences of the stigma of overweight. In J. K. Swim & C. Stangor. (Eds.), Prejudice: The target's perspective (pp. 125-143). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  81. Rink, F., & Ellemers, N. (2007). Diversity as a basis for shared organizational identity: The norm congruity principle. British Journal of Management, 18, 17-27.
  82. Scheepers, D., & Ellemers, N. (2005). When the pressure is up: The assessment of social identity threat in low and high-status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 192-200.
  83. Schmader, T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 440-452.
  84. Schmader, T., & Major, B. (1999). The impact of ingroup vs outgroup performance on personal values. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 47-67.
  85. Schmader, T., Major, B., Eccleston, C. P., & McCoy, S. K. (2001). Devaluing domains in response to threatening intergroup comparisons: Perceived legitimacy and the status value asymmetry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 782-796.
  86. Schmader, T., Major, B., & Gramzow, R. H. (2001). Coping with ethnic stereotypes in the academic domain: Perceived injustice and psychological disengagement. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 93-111.
  87. Schmitt, M. T., Spears, R., & Branscombe, N. R. (2003). Constructing a minority group identity out of shared rejection: The case of international students. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-12.
  88. Seibt, B., & Förster, J. (2004). Stereotype threat and performance: How self-stereotypes influence processing by inducing regulatory foci. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 38-56.
  89. Simon, B. (1998). Individuals, groups, and social change: On the relationship between individual and collective self-interpretations and collective action. In C. Sedikides & J. Schopler. (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp. 257-282). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  90. Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4-28.
  91. Stangor, C., & Sechrist, G. B. (1998). Conceptualizing the determinants of academic choice and task performance across social groups. In J. K. Swim & C. Stangor. (Eds.), Prejudice: The target's perspective (pp. 105-124). San Diego, CA: Academic Press
  92. Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In M. P. Zanna. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 379-440). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  93. Swan, S., & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (1997). Gender stereotypes and social identity: How being in the minority affects judgment of self and others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1265-1276.
  94. Swim, J. K., & Stangor, C. (Eds.). (1998). Prejudice: The target's perspective. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  95. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
  96. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin. (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
  97. Taylor, D. M., & McKirnan, D. J. (1984). Theoretical contributions: A five-stage model of intergroup relations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 291-300.
  98. Van Laar, C., & Derks, B. (2003). Managing stigma: Disidentification from the academic domain. In F. Salili & R. Hoosain. (Eds.), Learning and motivation in a multicultural setting (pp. 345-393). Greenwich, CN: Information Age Publishing.
  99. Van Steenbergen, E. F., Ellemers, N., & Mooijaart, A. (2007). How work and family can facilitate each other: Distinct types of work-family facilitation and outcomes for women and men. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12, 279-300.
  100. Van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A. H., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 649-664.
  101. Verkuyten, M., & Thijs, J. (2004). Psychological disidentification with the academic domain among ethnic minority adolescents in the Netherlands. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 109-125.
  102. Watson, C. B., Chemers, M. M., & Preiser, N. (2001). Collective efficacy: A multilevel analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1057-1068.
  103. Wright, S. C. (2001a). Restricted intergroup boundaries: Tokenism, ambiguity, and the tolerance of injustice. In J. T. Jost & B. Major. (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 223-254). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  104. Wright, S. C. (2001b). Strategic collective action: Social psychology and social change. In R. Brown & S. Gaertner. (Eds.), Intergroup processes (pp. 409-431). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  105. Wright, S. C., & Taylor, D. M. (1998). Responding to tokenism: Individual action in the face of collective injustice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 647-667.
  106. Wright, S. C., & Taylor, D. M. (1999). Success under tokenism: Co-option of the newcomer and the prevention of collective protest. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 369-396.
  107. Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a dis- advantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994-1003.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Derks, B., Van Laar, C., & Ellemers, N.
Affiliations
Leiden University (NL)
Corresponding author
Derks, Belle
ORCID
Venue
Social Issues and Policy Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-12
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
217-256
ISSN
  • 1751-2395 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-2409
DOI
10.1111/j.1751-2409.2007.00008.x
OpenAlex
W1697655655
Cited by
77
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Social Issues and Policy Review (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
Keywords
achievement motivation, stigmatized groups, women, ethnic minorities, self-segregation, social status, collective action, organizational communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review