Cited by 89Social and Intergroup PsychologySocial Power and Status DynamicsDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Striving for Success in Outgroup Settings: Effects of Contextually Emphasizing Ingroup Dimensions on Stigmatized Group Members’ Social Identity and Performance Styles

Open access
Derks, Belle, van Laar, Colette, Ellemers, Naomi·2006·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

For members of stigmatized groups, being confronted with highstatus outgroup members threatens social identity and undermines performance on status-relevant dimensions. Two experiments examined whether the negative effects of outgroup contexts are alleviated when value is expressed for a dimension on which the stigmatized ingroup excels. Specifically, the authors assessed whether ingroup versus outgroup context and contextual value for ingroup dimensions affects group members' reactions to failure on status-relevant dimensions and subsequent performance. Experiment 1 showed that in comparison to ingroup contexts, outgroup contexts induce stigmatized group members to protect social identity and to feel more agitated following negative performance feedback. Experiment 2 showed that when others in the context emphasize the importance of a dimension on which the ingroup excels, the negative effects of outgroup contexts are alleviated, stigmatized group members feel more cheerful concerning an upcoming task, and task performance is characterized by a focus on success.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167205283336

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals from historically subordinated social groups typically resolve identity conflict by adapting to the extant culture.

    “They resolve an identity conflict by adapting to the extant culture, a fairly typical response for individuals from historically subordinated social groups (e.g., Chattopadhyay et al., 2004;Derks et al., 2006).”

    From How to study democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Derks et al., 2006

    The section ‘How Does Group Context Affect Social Identity?’ describes coping with social identity threat by devaluing dimensions favored by a high-status outgroup or valuing ingroup strengths. The General Discussion mentions individual mobility, but neither passage says that adapting to the prevailing culture is a typical way for historically subordinated groups to resolve identity conflict. Searches for adaptation, assimilation, and individual mobility did not establish that claim. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Derks, B., van Laar, C., & Ellemers, N.
Affiliations
Leiden University (NL)
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2006-05
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
576-588
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2025750763
Cited by
89
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
18.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
stigmatized groups, social identity, status threat, performance feedback, task performance, contextual values
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Communication, Conflict, Psychological, Defense Mechanisms, Educational Status, Feedback, Female, Gender Identity, Group Processes, Hierarchy, Social, Humans, Motivation, Prejudice, Psychological Distance, Social Identification, Social Values, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review