Cited by 460Social and Intergroup PsychologyEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Combating stereotype threat: The effect of self‐affirmation on women's intellectual performance

Martens, Andy, Johns, Michael, Greenberg, Jeff, Schimel, Jeff·2006·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.04.010

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Promisingly, lab studies demonstrate that affirmations can improve the performance of students working under the specter of a negative stereotype.

    “Promisingly, lab studies demonstrate that affirmations can improve the performance of students working under the specter of a negative stereotype (Martens et al. 2006, Shapiro et al. 2012, Taylor & Walton 2011).”

    From The Psychology of Change: Self-Affirmation and Social Psychological Intervention (2014) · cites this paper as Martens et al. 2006

  • Women in the diagnostic condition who completed a self-affirmation performed as well as women in the no-threat condition and no differently from male college students.

    “women in the diagnostic condition who completed a self-aYrmation-where they wrote about an important value unrelated to math or to their gender-performed as well as women in the no-threat condition and no diVerent from male college students.”

    From The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory (2006) · cites this paper as Martens et al., 2006

  • Self-affirmation appears to reduce stereotype threat among students in laboratory situations.

    “Given the evidence that self-aYrmation appears to reduce stereotype threat among students in laboratory situations (Martens et al., 2006;Schimel et al., 2004)”

    From The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory (2006) · cites this paper as Martens et al., 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martens, A., Johns, M., Greenberg, J., & Schimel, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Martens, Andy
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-03
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
236-243
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030568963
Cited by
460
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 35
FWCI
24.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • UC Research Repository (University of Canterbury) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
stereotype threat, self-affirmation, gender stereotypes, mathematics achievement, spatial ability, diagnosticity, gender differences in performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review