Cited by 136Mental Health Treatment and AccessSocial and Intergroup PsychologyRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

Discreditable: Stigma Effects of Revealing a Mental Illness History on Test Performance

Quinn, Diane M., Kahng, Sang Kyoung, Crocker, Jennifer·2004·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

In three studies, the authors examined the effect of revealing a concealable social stigma--mental illness--on intellectual performance. It was hypothesized that revealing this deeply discrediting stigma would result in performance decrements. College students either with or without a history of mental illness (MI) treatment participated. In Study 1, the type of mental illness was left unselected. In Study 2, only participants who reported a history of depression participated. In Study 3, a comparison group of participants with a history of eating disorder were included. Results showed that the MI participants who revealed their history did worse on the reasoning test than did those in the no reveal condition. There was a trend in the opposite direction for participants with no MI. As predicted, revealing a narrower stigma, eating disorder, did not affect performance. The results are discussed in terms of identity threat and concealable stigmas.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167204264088

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Autism could be conceptualised as existing on a continuum from conspicuous to concealable, depending on an individual's particular profile of autistic behaviours as well as their ability to conceal these behaviours.

    “In a similar manner to other stigmatised identities (e.g. mental illness; Quinn et al., 2004), autism could be conceptualised as existing on a continuum from conspicuous to concealable, depending on an individual’s particular profile of autistic behaviours as well as their ability to conceal these behaviours.”

    From Camouflaging in an everyday social context: An interpersonal recall study (2021) · cites this paper as Quinn et al., 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quinn, D. M., Kahng, S. K., & Crocker, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Quinn, Diane M.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2004-07
Volume
30
Issue
7
Pages
803-815
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W1992683841
Cited by
135
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 18
FWCI
6.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
mental health stigma, concealable stigma, test performance, cognitive performance, identity threat, depression, eating disorders, reasoning tests, university students
MeSH terms
Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Mental Disorders, Depression, Female, Humans, Intelligence Tests, Male, Prejudice, Stereotyping, Task Performance and Analysis, Truth Disclosure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review