The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Selection Bias in Web Surveys
Open accessAbstract
Summary: At first sight, web surveys seem to be an interesting and attractive means of data collection. They provide simple, cheap, and fast access to a large group of potential respondents. However, web surveys are not without methodological problems. Specific groups in the populations are under‐represented because they have less access to Internet. Furthermore, recruitment of respondents is often based on self‐selection. Both under‐coverage and self‐selection may lead to biased estimates. This paper describes these methodological problems. It also explores the effect of various correction techniques (adjustment weighting and use of reference surveys). This all leads to the question whether properly design web surveys can be used for data collection. The paper attempts to answer this question. It concludes that under‐coverage problems may solve itself in the future, but that self‐selection leads to unreliable survey outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The reliability and validity of web-based self-reported mental disorder symptom clusters remains ambiguous,71 certainly for the current population”
From Mental Disorder Symptoms among Public Safety Personnel in Canada (2018) · cites this paper as [71]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In contrast, the current rates may be inflated because of a self-selection bias of motivated responding by clinically symptomatic persons.71”
From Mental Disorder Symptoms among Public Safety Personnel in Canada (2018) · cites this paper as [71]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
ROSENBAUM, P. R., & RUBIN, D. B. (1983) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · Cited by 31,241
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Lahiff, M., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289883 · Cited by 17,385
Statistical Analysis with Missing Data
Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119013563 · Cited by 8,473
Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2008) · Cited by 5,345
A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe
Horvitz, D. G., & Thompson, D. J. (1952) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1952.10483446 · Cited by 4,293
Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1984.10478078 · Cited by 3,082
A Generalization of Sampling Without Replacement From a Finite Universe
Horvitz, D. G., & Thompson, D. J. (1952) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2280784 · Cited by 3,011
Couper, M. P. (2000) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/318641 · Cited by 2,086
Neyman, J. (1934) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society · doi:10.2307/2342192 · Cited by 1,086
The Effectiveness of Adjustment by Subclassification in Removing Bias in Observational Studies
Cochran, W. G. (1968) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2528036 · Cited by 961
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Bethlehem J.G., 1988, Reduction of the nonresponse bias through regression estimation, J. Official Statist., 4, 251
- Bethlehem J.G., 2002, Survey Nonresponse
- Bethlehem J.G., 2009, The Rise of Survey Sampling
- Börsch‐Supan A., 2004, Correcting the Participation Bias in an Online Survey
- Bowley A.L., 1926, Measurement of the precision attained in sampling, Bull. Int. Statist. Inst., 6
- Cobben F., 2004, Nonresponse Correction Techniques in Household Surveys at Statistics Netherlands: a CAPI‐CATI Comparison
- Cochran W.G., 1953, Sampling Techniques
- Cochran W.G., 1977, Sampling Techniques
- De Haan J., 2006, Jaarboek ICT en Samenleving, De Digitale Generatie
- Eurostat, 2007, More than 40% of Households have Broadband Internet Access
- Hansen M.H., 1953, Survey Sampling Methods and Theory
- Kendall M.G., 1960, Where shall the history of statistics begin, Biometrika, 47, 447
- Kiaer A. N., 1895, Observations et Expériences Concernant des Dénombrements Représentatives, Bull. Internat. Statist. Inst., 176
- Kiaer A. N., 1997, Den Repräsentative Undersökelsesmetode, Christiania Videnskabsselskabets Skrifter. II. Historiskfilosofiske klasse, 4, 37
- Kish L., 1967, Survey Sampling
- Kuusela V., 2003, Proceedings of the 4th ASC International Conference, 317
- 10.1111/j.2397-2335.1934.tb04184.x · DOI
- Scherpenzeel A., 2010, Social Research and the Internet: Advances in applied Methods and New Research Strategies
- Terhanian G., 2001, Exploiting analytical advances: Minimizing the biases associated with Internet‐based surveys of non‐random samples, ESOMAR Publication Services, 248, 247
- Vonk T., 2006, The effects of panel recruitment and management on research results, a study among 19 online panels, ESOMAR Publication Services, 317, 79
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,000
Mobile payment adoption process: a serial of multiple mediation and moderation analysis
Oentoro, W. (2021) · The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances · doi:10.1108/bl-09-2020-0059 · Cited by 37
HELGESON, J. F., Aminpour, P., Fung, J. F., Roa-Henriquez, A. R., Zycherman, A., Butry, D. T., Nierenberg, C., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102845 · Cited by 28
“At the same time, not all potential respondents always have access to the Internet and their recruitment is characterized by self-selection; there can be “under-coverage bias” [66].”
BackgroundLehmann, N., Sloot, D., Ardone, A., & Fïchtner, W. (2022) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106003 · Cited by 28
Pop, C., & Khampirat, B. (2019) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.12.004 · Cited by 28
Weisenburger, R. L., Mullarkey, M. C., Labrada, J., Labrousse, D., Yang, M. Y., Huff, A. J., Hsu, K. J., Ugail, H., Shumake, J., & Beevers, C. G. (2024) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2024.01.212 · Cited by 31
Casella, C. B., Kousoulis, A. A., Kohrt, B. A., Bantjes, J. R., Kieling, C., Cuijpers, P. J., Kline, S., Kotsis, K. T., Polanczyk, G. V., Stein, D. J., et al. (2025) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(24)00563-1 · Cited by 30
Haller, D. J., Fischer, P., & Frey, D. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01094 · Cited by 33
Takase, Y., Hadi, A. A., & Furuya, K. (2018) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-018-1106-6 · Cited by 27
“On the other hand, online surveys may suffer from problems such as undercoverage and self-selection (Bethlehem 2010).”
BackgroundFood Safety Risk Information-Seeking Intention of WeChat Users in China
Zhao-hui, Y., Paudel, K. P., Wen, X., Sun, S., & Wang, Y. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17072376 · Cited by 27
“(3) Other issues that may limit the interpretation of the results are that an online survey may have under-coverage and self-selection bias problems [45].”
BackgroundDog and cat owners’ use of online Facebook groups for pet health information
Kogan, L. R., Little, S. E., & Oxley, J. A. (2021) · Health Information & Libraries Journal · doi:10.1111/hir.12351 · Cited by 27
Coulaud, P.-J., Ablona, A., Bolduc, N., Fast, D., Bertrand, K., Ward, J. K., Greyson, D. L., Jauffret‐Roustide, M., & Knight, R. (2022) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.02.085 · Cited by 27
Sherratt, F. C., Newson, L., & Field, J. K. (2016) · Respiratory Research · doi:10.1186/s12931-016-0367-y · Cited by 26
“It should be noted that the study design entailed a self-selected sample and findings could therefore result in potential bias, however, this is a limitation of any self-selecting online survey [30].”
BackgroundBlogs as Elusive Ethnographic Texts
Kurtz, L. C., Trainer, S. S., Beresford, M., Wutich, A., & Brewis, A. (2017) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406917705796 · Cited by 35
Why do newcomers vote for a newcomer? Support for an immigrant party
Otjes, S., & Krouwel, A. P. M. (2018) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2018.1427053 · Cited by 27
“This approach allows us to deal with the problem that in VAAs, like many online surveys and panels, tend to under-cover specific groups because they are self-selected (Bethlehem 2010): young men with higher education are overrepresented in VAA data sets compared to the total voting population.”
BackgroundHow to Combine Survey Media (Web, Telephone, Face-to-Face): Lyon and Rhône-alps Case Study
Bayart, C., & Bonnel, P. (2015) · Transportation research procedia · doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2015.12.011 · Cited by 27
“If the socioeconomic characteristics of households who answer on the internet differ from those of the target population, their mobility habits may not be the same (Bethlehem, 2010).”
BackgroundBretter, C., & Schulz, F. (2025) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108603 · Cited by 30
Impact of Client Suicide on Psychologists in Australia
Finlayson, M., & Simmonds, J. G. (2016) · Australian Psychologist · doi:10.1111/ap.12240 · Cited by 26
“Technical issues such as slow modems and unreliable connections may have also deterred some participation (Bethlehem, 2010).”
BackgroundPrevalence and Determinants of Fasted Training in Endurance Athletes: A Survey Analysis
Rothschild, J. A., Kilding, A. E., & Plews, D. J. (2020) · International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism · doi:10.1123/ijsnem.2020-0109 · Cited by 26
Public opinions on seven different stray cat population management scenarios in Flanders, Belgium
Ruyver, C. D., Abatih, E., Villa, P. D., Peeters, E., Clements, J., Dufau, A., & Moons, C. P. H. (2021) · Research in Veterinary Science · doi:10.1016/j.rvsc.2021.02.025 · Cited by 30
“As with other surveys our sample is subject to self-selection bias (Bethlehem, 2010; Khazaal et al., 2014).”
ResultEckert, C., Eckert, J., & Zitzmann, A. (2021) · Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s12297-021-00507-y · Cited by 26
“Hence, participants with higher levels of digital affinity are more likely to select themselves for the survey (Bethlehem 2010), which is why we rather overestimate the progress of the digital transformation in traditional insurance sales.”
BackgroundInfluentialBhat, F. A., & Verma, A. (2023) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-023-10430-z · Cited by 27
“Online surveys are also more accessible to people who are technologically grown and have access to the internet which is not always the case in developing economies and subsequently leads to an underrepresentation of certain sections of the population (Bethlehem 2010).”
Schwab‐Reese, L. M., Hovdestad, W., Tonmyr, L., & Fluke, J. (2018) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.01.014 · Cited by 26
“However, there may be bias in the results of studies using Amazon Mechanical Turk and Google Consumer Surveys related to varying access to the internet within a population so older adults, individuals with lower socioeconomic status, and others may be underrepresented (Bethlehem, 2010).”
BackgroundTourangeau, R. (2017) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfx031 · Cited by 26
Can computer game landscapes target new audiences for landscape quality assessment?
Swetnam, R. D., & Korenko, J. (2019) · Applied Geography · doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.102102 · Cited by 27
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback in LLMs: Whose Culture, Whose Values, Whose Perspectives?
Barman, K. G., Lohse, S., & de Regt, H. W. (2025) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-025-00861-0 · Cited by 43
“The issue here is that there may be certain people who are more inclined to provide this feedback than others, creating a possible self-selection bias (see Bethlehem, 2010 for self-selection effects in web surveys).”
Public Perceptions of Billboards: A Meta-Analysis
Franke, G. R., & Taylor, C. R. (2017) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2017.1334248 · Cited by 25
Dunphy, E., & Gardner, E. C. (2020) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/19296 · Cited by 25
“All surveys are limited to the data gathered, and it is known that participation can be affected by socioeconomic condition and education or digital literacy levels, where some populations are known to be less likely to access internet surveys [43].”
BackgroundPhysical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour in People with Myasthenia Gravis: A Cross-Sectional Study
Alsop, T., Williams, K., & Gomersall, S. R. (2021) · Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases · doi:10.3233/jnd-210722 · Cited by 25
Borle, P., Reichel, K., & Voelter‐Mahlknecht, S. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18042071 · Cited by 26
“This issue has been reported in earlier methodological assessments of commercial online panels [54,55].”
Constructing meanings of luxury in Airbnb
Farmaki, A., Spanou, E., & Christou, P. (2021) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-04-2021-0429 · Cited by 25
Platform work in a Coordinated Market Economy
Funke, C., & Picot, G. (2021) · Industrial Relations Journal · doi:10.1111/irj.12339 · Cited by 25
Strengthening referees’ psychological well-being through engagement and authenticity
Kim, M., Kim, H. S., Simmond, A., & Warner, S. M. (2021) · Sport Management Review · doi:10.1080/14413523.2021.1930952 · Cited by 31
“Because self-selection relies on non-probability sampling methods (Bethlehem, 2010), the sample used in this study could not represent the entire population of high school basketball referees, thereby potentially affecting response levels or errors (Couper, 2000).”
MethodAmieva, H., Retuerto, N., Hernández‐Ruiz, V., Meillon, C., Dartigues, J., & Pérès, K. (2022) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders · doi:10.1159/000521999 · Cited by 25
Student physiotherapists perceptions of online curriculum delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic
Chesterton, P., Richardson, M. C., & Tears, C. (2022) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03486-5 · Cited by 36
“It is possible that students who responded to the questionnaire are not representative of the entire target population [67].”
BackgroundEscobar, S., Alegría-Morán, R. A., Calderón-Amor, J., & Tadich, T. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9100745 · Cited by 25
“Thus, the researcher is not in control of the selection process [35].”
BackgroundHalim, Z. M., Dickinson, K. M., Kemps, E., & Prichard, I. J. (2020) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s1368980019004282 · Cited by 25
Thielo, A. J., Graham, A., & Cullen, F. T. (2021) · The Encyclopedia of Research Methods in Criminology and Criminal Justice · doi:10.1002/9781119111931.ch55 · Cited by 25
Paternal Self-Efficacy: A Parenting Resilience Factor for Fathers with Depression
Trahan, M. H., & Shafer, K. M. (2019) · Social Work Research · doi:10.1093/swr/svz004 · Cited by 25
Impact of cause-affinity and CSR fit on consumer purchase intention
Gupta, S. S., & Wadera, D. (2020) · Society and Business Review · doi:10.1108/sbr-01-2020-0012 · Cited by 26
National Norms and Correlates of the PHQ-8 and GAD-7 in Parents of School-age Children
Sequeira, S. L., Morrow, K. E., Silk, J. S., Kolko, D. J., Pilkonis, P. A., & Lindhiem, O. J. (2021) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-021-02026-x · Cited by 27
“Relatedly, though the sample was recruited based on estimates of population characteristics, these estimates will always have some error (Bethlehem, 2010).”
BackgroundFrankel, L. A., Kuno, C. B., & Sampige, R. R. (2021) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-021-02333-y · Cited by 24
“This is a common issue with online surveys (Bethlehem, 2010).”
BackgroundBhat, F. A., Seth, Y., & Verma, A. (2024) · Travel Behaviour & Society · doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100748 · Cited by 25
Jauhar, S., & Hayes, J. (2019) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.01.025 · Cited by 23
Examining Social Desirability Bias in Online and Offline Surveys
Koivula, A., Räsänen, P., & Sarpila, O. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-22646-6_11 · Cited by 23
Reinhard, C., & Galloway, S. D. R. (2022) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2022.862396 · Cited by 25
“Although we had prevented multiple votes per participant (the survey could be taken only once from the same device), online surveys generally pose the risk of a self-selection bias (43).”
BackgroundMangiardi-Veltin, M., Sebbag, C., Rousset‐Jablonski, C., Ray-Coquard, I. L., Berkach, C., Laot, L., Wang, Y., Abdennebi, I., Labrosse, J., Sautter, C., et al. (2021) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.12.019 · Cited by 23
Richardson, J. D., Cyr, K. S., Forchuk, C. A., Liu, J. J. W., Plouffe, R. A., Le, T., Gargala, D., Deda, E., Soares, V., Hosseiny, F., et al. (2022) · European Journal of Psychotraumatology · doi:10.1080/20008198.2021.2012374 · Cited by 23
“Thus, Veteran groups who do not have ready access to the internet, a computer, or smartphone/devices, or who are less familiar with the use of digital devices may be underrepresented in our sample (Bethlehem, 2010).”
BackgroundReal-world evidence on the economic implications of CGRP-mAbs as preventive treatment of migraine
Siersbæk, N., Kilsdal, L., Jervelund, C., Antić, S., & Bendtsen, L. (2023) · BMC Neurology · doi:10.1186/s12883-023-03302-7 · Cited by 24
“The sample was a non-random sample of patients who self-selected into participation in the research project, which may give rise to self-selection bias [35].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRicciardelli, R., Carleton, R. N., Taillieu, T., Dorniani, S., Johnston, M. S., Carbonell, M., Coulling, R., Andrés, E., & Afifi, T. O. (2024) · Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102168 · Cited by 23
Bhat, F. A., Seth, Y., & Verma, A. (2024) · Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2024.104200 · Cited by 20
Moesch, S., Straka, T. M., Jeschke, J. M., Haase, D., & Kramer‐Schadt, S. (2024) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-15211-290306 · Cited by 27
“Because online surveys might attract only specific demographics (Bethlehem 2010, Andrade 2020), it is imperative to consider the potential influence of our dissemination strategy.”
Occupational stress and social support among nurses
Dziedzic, B., Łodziana, K., Marcysiak, M., & Kryczka, T. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1621312 · Cited by 28
“However, online surveys often yield more reliable data, likely because respondents feel less concerned about their privacy (63).”
Trahan, M. H., Morley, R. H., & Shafer, K. (2020) · Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal · doi:10.1007/s10560-020-00677-1
“Additionally, respondents were paid for their participation in the panel survey, which may influence their responses and increase self-selection bias (Bethlehem, 2010), and quota sampling may not provide for identity of the respondent (Im & Chee, 2011).”
BackgroundRothschild, J. A., Kilding, A. E., & Plews, D. J. (2020) · Journal of the American College of Nutrition · doi:10.1080/07315724.2020.1795950 · Cited by 22
“Due to a selfselection bias (49), it is also possible that the respondents who chose to participate may not represent all endurance athletes.”
BackgroundAlemu, M. H., & Grebitus, C. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0243949 · Cited by 22
Lehmann, N., Sloot, D., Ardone, A., & Fïchtner, W. (2021) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105351 · Cited by 23
“For example, self-selection bias may be present in both samples (see Bethlehem 2010).”
BackgroundMcFadden, P., Neill, R. D., Moriarty, J., Gillen, P. A., Mallett, J., Manthorpe, J., Currie, D., Schroder, H. S., Ravalier, J. M., Nicholl, P., et al. (2021) · Epidemiologia · doi:10.3390/epidemiologia2030017 · Cited by 24
Disability, Discrimination, and Mental Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Stress Process Model
Brown, R. L., & Ciciurkaite, G. (2022) · Society and Mental Health · doi:10.1177/21568693221115347 · Cited by 23
Turnover of Companies in OpenStack: Prevalence and Rationale
Zhang, Y., Liu, H., Tan, X. L., Zhou, M., Jin, Z. G., & Zhu, J. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3510849 · Cited by 22
“As pointed out by existing studies [3, 44, 65], survey results might be affected by a selection bias: companies that did not respond may have had different reasons for disengaging.”
ResultHow Representative Are SMS Surveys in Africa? Experimental Evidence From Four Countries
Lau, C., Lombaard, A., Baker, M., Eyerman, J., & Thalji, L. (2018) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edy008 · Cited by 22
Moser, A., von Wyl, V., & Höglinger, M. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0256253 · Cited by 22
“First, because our survey is online-based, we probably include more individuals with a greater affinity to online processes and better educated individuals in the survey, which leads to some sampling selection bias [54].”
BackgroundSteinmetz, S., Bianchi, A., Tijdens, K. G., & Biffignandi, S. (2014) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118763520.ch12 · Cited by 25
Ali, M., Amir, H., & Ahmed, M. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3261753 · Cited by 22
Barber, D., Peake, W. O., & Harris, M. L. (2022) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1080/00472778.2022.2141762 · Cited by 21
“As such self-selection bias remains a limitation of our methodological approach and survey data in general, whether internet based (Bethlehem, 2010) or mail in (Whitehead, 1991).”
BackgroundCyr, S., Marcil, M.-J., Houchi, C., Marin, M., Rosa, C., Tardif, J., Guay, S., Guertin, M., Genest, C., Forest, J., et al. (2022) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-022-04457-2 · Cited by 25
“The web-based aspect of the study might have caused a volunteer and selection bias [69].”
BackgroundDonadeu, F. X., Howes, N. L., Esteves, C. L., Howes, M. P., Byrne, T. J., & Macrae, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2020.00127 · Cited by 21
“Voluntary respondents in a survey typically tend to be members of the sample populations (UK farmer and veterinary communities in this case) that are more concerned about the topic under survey and have also stronger opinions about it (12).”
Background(2015) · Ubiquity Press eBooks · doi:10.5334/bar.g · Cited by 21
Ethnic Restaurants: Bringing Uniqueness to the Table Through Handwriting
Chen, F. F., Liu, S. Q., & Mattila, A. S. (2021) · Cornell Hospitality Quarterly · doi:10.1177/19389655211025472 · Cited by 20
“Specifically, in the recruitment message we broadly described the research as a consumer behavior study and did not mention the ethnic restaurant context to minimize potential self-selection bias (Bethlehem, 2010).”
BackgroundMental health emergencies and COVID-19: the impact of ‘lockdown’ in the East Midlands of the UK
Moore, H. E., Siriwardena, A. N., Gussy, M. G., Tanser, F. C., Hill, B., & Spaight, R. (2021) · BJPsych Open · doi:10.1192/bjo.2021.973 · Cited by 21
Migrants' Voter Turnout in the Home Country Elections: Non‐Integration or Political Anchor?
Gherghina, S., & Basarabă, A. (2023) · Politics and Governance · doi:10.17645/pag.7396 · Cited by 20
“However, two main disadvantages are the coverage bias rooted in unequal internet access (van Dijk, 2005) and self‐selection bias due to topic saliency (Bethlehem, 2010).”
BackgroundMental health disorder symptoms among serving Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Carleton, R. N., Jamshidi, L., Nisbet, J., Shields, R. E., & Andrews, K. L. (2024) · Police Practice and Research · doi:10.1080/15614263.2024.2318209 · Cited by 20
“…data collection precludes causal claims because the higher prevalence may reflect other factors, including increased reporting due to RCMP and other efforts at increasing psychoeducation and reducing stigma (Carleton, 2021; Carleton et al., 2022) or self-selection bias (Bethlehem, 2010).”
Indirect effects of trait impulsivity on body mass
Meule, A., & Jens Blechert, A. (2017) · Eating Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2017.01.012 · Cited by 20
“Specifically, samples in web-based studies are biased due to under-coverage and self-selection (Bethlehem, 2010) and the majority of participants in the current study were female students who had normal weight.”
BackgroundChurch, D., Stapleton, P., & Sabot, D. (2020) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/18545 · Cited by 20
“As with many web-based surveys, the current large convenience sample comprising app users was determined by self-selection rather than probability sampling, which can lead to biased estimates [82].”
BackgroundCopas, A. J., Burkill, S. M., Conrad, F., Couper, M. P., & Erens, B. (2020) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-020-01134-4 · Cited by 19
Wu, P. (2024) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106464 · Cited by 19
Shen, X. S., Pan, B., Hu, T., Chen, K., Qiao, L., & Zhu, J. (2020) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights · doi:10.1108/jhti-02-2020-0012 · Cited by 20
Taracuk, M. D., & Koch, J. M. (2021) · International Journal of Transgender Health · doi:10.1080/26895269.2021.1878479 · Cited by 21
How personality affects reaction. A mental health behavioral insight review during the Pandemic
Mourelatos, E. (2021) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-021-02425-9 · Cited by 27
A Review of Nonprobability Sampling Using Mobile Apps for Fishing Effort and Catch Surveys
Brick, J. M., Andrews, W. R., & Foster, J. R. (2021) · Transactions of the American Fisheries Society · doi:10.1002/tafs.10342 · Cited by 19
Mental Health Disorders and Suicidal Behaviors Among Provincial Correctional Workers
Ricciardelli, R., McKendy, L., Jamshidi, L., & Carleton, R. N. (2022) · Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1097/jom.0000000000002488 · Cited by 25
“The current results were still based on self-report, rather than clinical interviews, which may also limit generalizability.(46) Respondents may under (or over) report symptoms, even when anonymous, which could impact results.”
ResultSeverijns, R., Streukens, S., Brouwer, J., & Lizin, S. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102094 · Cited by 23
Reiter, T., & Schoedel, R. (2023) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02252-9 · Cited by 29
“Second, when interpreting our results, we should keep in mind that the lack of some effects, e.g., for the person features, might be related to one major challenge of many empiricalstudies:self-selectionorcollider-stratification-bias (Bethlehem, 2010; Cinelli et al., 2022).”
BackgroundSass, K. S., Konak, A., de Macedo, M. B., Benso, M. R., Shrimpton, E. A., Balta‐Ozkan, N., Sarmah, T., Mendiondo, E. M., da Silva, G. J., da Silva, P. G. C., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104616 · Cited by 19
Bataille, P., Perrenoud, M., & Brändle, K. (2018) · Sociologie · doi:10.3917/socio.092.0197 · Cited by 19
“Si ce biais des enquêtes par internet est bien connu et documenté (Bethlehem, 2010), nos résultats montrent que l’échantillonnage par RDS peut être une alternative efficace et de qualité quand, dans les cas comme le nôtre, la population visée n’apparaît dans aucun registre préexistant.”
BackgroundWride, J., & Bannigan, K. (2019) · Scandinavian Journal of Pain · doi:10.1515/sjpain-2018-0347 · Cited by 19
“Since our respondents were able to choose whether to participate in the study, it is not possible to say that this was a representative sample of the population as a whole [51].”
Bridging the void: science communication videos for sustainable whale watching
Finkler, W., Higham, J. E. S., León, B., & Aitken, R. (2019) · International Journal of Science Education Part B · doi:10.1080/21548455.2019.1671636 · Cited by 19
“This reflects both the popularity of whales and whale watching (Chen, 2011) as well as the fact that online surveys can have some preselection bias towards topics of personal interests (Bethlehem, 2010; Lohmann & Schmücker, 2009).”
BackgroundBigras, N., Bosisio, M., Daspe, M., & Godbout, N. (2020) · International Journal of Sexual Health · doi:10.1080/19317611.2020.1796881 · Cited by 22
“Also, individuals who select themselves for the survey (e.g., self-selection bias) may be of great importance (Bethlehem, 2010) regarding who would volunteer for online child maltreatment and sexuality research.”
BackgroundHoorens, V., Scambler, S., Deschrijver, E., Coulson, N., Speed, E., & Asimakopoulou, K. G. (2022) · Psychologica Belgica · doi:10.5334/pb.1139 · Cited by 21
Diversity and ethics in trauma and acute care surgery teams: results from an international survey
Cobianchi, L., Mas, F. D., Massaro, M., Biffl, W. L., Catena, F., Coccolini, F., Dionigi, B., Dionigi, P., Saverio, S. D., Fugazzola, P., et al. (2022) · World Journal of Emergency Surgery · doi:10.1186/s13017-022-00446-8 · Cited by 18
Rueda, M. D. M., Pasadas‐del‐Amo, S., Cobo, B., Castro-Martín, L., & Ferri‐García, R. (2022) · Biometrical Journal · doi:10.1002/bimj.202200035 · Cited by 19
“…have large sample sizes, they present important selection and coverage problems since the sample generation process is unknown in most cases, so they can compromise the generalization of the results to the population under study (Bethlehem, 2010; Elliott & Haviland, 2007; Vehovar et al., 2016).”
ResultBeyond Racial Linked Fate: Inter-Minority Political Solidarity and Political Participation
Mejía, Y. D. M. (2023) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-023-09861-2 · Cited by 18
“2 There are concerns with web surveys due to sampling issues and internet accessibility (Bethlehem, 2010; Couper & Miller, 2008; Dillman, 2006).”
Feigerlová, E. (2024) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1093/jsxmed/qdae186 · Cited by 18
Modelling Nonlinearities and Reference Dependence in General Practitioners' Income Preferences
Holte, J. H., Sivey, P. M., Abelsen, B., & Olsen, J. A. (2015) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.3208 · Cited by 19
Laméris, J., Kraaykamp, G., Ruiter, S., & Tolsma, J. (2018) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.01.002 · Cited by 18
Can a voluntary web survey be useful beyond explorative research?
Fabo, B., & Kahanec, M. (2018) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/13645579.2018.1454639 · Cited by 18
“…of some sub-populations and selection into survey samples, relate to sources of survey error associated with coverage, non-response and measurement, as well as inference from non-probability samples (Bandilla, Bosnjak, & Altdorfer, 2003; Bethlehem, 2010; Couper, 2000; Dillman & Bowker, 2001).”
BackgroundTwo shades of Green? The electorates of GreenLeft and the Party for the Animals
Otjes, S., & Krouwel, A. P. M. (2015) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2015.1067349 · Cited by 18
“Most online surveys are subject to problems of under-coverage and selfselection that can potentially bias estimates (Bethlehem 2010).”
BackgroundBouwhuis, S., Hoekstra, T., Bongers, P. M., Boot, C. R. L., Geuskens, G., & van der Beek, A. J. (2018) · International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health · doi:10.1007/s00420-018-1351-2 · Cited by 18
“This may have biased our findings (Bethlehem 2010).”
ResultAlternate policing strategies: Cost-effectiveness of cautioning for cannabis offences
Shanahan, M., Hughes, C., McSweeney, T., & Griffin, B. A. (2017) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.12.012 · Cited by 17
Profiles of Citizenship Orientations Among Youth
Tzankova, I., Prati, G., & Cicognani, E. (2021) · Young · doi:10.1177/11033088211008691 · Cited by 21
“As the population of interest were young people with greater Internet access (Bethlehem, 2010) and in Italy the rate of regular Internet usage is about 90% among those aged 15–24 (ISTAT, 2018b), under-coverage bias should be of less concern in the present study.”
BackgroundMethodAndrews, K. L., Jamshidi, L., Nisbet, J., Brunet, A., Afifi, T. O., Asmundson, G. J. G., Fletcher, A. J., Maguire, K. Q., Teckchandani, T. A., Lix, L. M., et al. (2023) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/07067437221149467 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Bethlehem, J.
- Affiliations
- Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Bethlehem, Jelke
- Venue
- International Statistical Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-188
- ISSN
- 0306-7734 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-5823
- OpenAlex
- W2129332419
- Cited by
- 1,315
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 228 · 2025: 173 · 2024: 151 · 2023: 149 · 2022: 122 · 2021: 144 · 2020: 109 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 29.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Statistical Review (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Census and Population Estimation
- Keywords
- online surveys, selection bias, undercoverage, self-selection, internet access, survey design, participant recruitment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review