The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Selection Bias in Web Surveys
Open accessAbstract
Summary: At first sight, web surveys seem to be an interesting and attractive means of data collection. They provide simple, cheap, and fast access to a large group of potential respondents. However, web surveys are not without methodological problems. Specific groups in the populations are under‐represented because they have less access to Internet. Furthermore, recruitment of respondents is often based on self‐selection. Both under‐coverage and self‐selection may lead to biased estimates. This paper describes these methodological problems. It also explores the effect of various correction techniques (adjustment weighting and use of reference surveys). This all leads to the question whether properly design web surveys can be used for data collection. The paper attempts to answer this question. It concludes that under‐coverage problems may solve itself in the future, but that self‐selection leads to unreliable survey outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The reliability and validity of web-based self-reported mental disorder symptom clusters remains ambiguous,71 certainly for the current population”
From Mental Disorder Symptoms among Public Safety Personnel in Canada (2018) · cites this paper as [71]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In contrast, the current rates may be inflated because of a self-selection bias of motivated responding by clinically symptomatic persons.71”
From Mental Disorder Symptoms among Public Safety Personnel in Canada (2018) · cites this paper as [71]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
ROSENBAUM, P. R., & RUBIN, D. B. (1983) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · Cited by 31,241
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Lahiff, M., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289883 · Cited by 17,385
Statistical Analysis with Missing Data
Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119013563 · Cited by 8,473
Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2008) · Cited by 5,345
A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe
Horvitz, D. G., & Thompson, D. J. (1952) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1952.10483446 · Cited by 4,293
Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1984.10478078 · Cited by 3,082
A Generalization of Sampling Without Replacement From a Finite Universe
Horvitz, D. G., & Thompson, D. J. (1952) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2280784 · Cited by 3,011
Couper, M. P. (2000) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/318641 · Cited by 2,086
Neyman, J. (1934) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society · doi:10.2307/2342192 · Cited by 1,086
The Effectiveness of Adjustment by Subclassification in Removing Bias in Observational Studies
Cochran, W. G. (1968) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2528036 · Cited by 961
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Bethlehem J.G., 1988, Reduction of the nonresponse bias through regression estimation, J. Official Statist., 4, 251
- Bethlehem J.G., 2002, Survey Nonresponse
- Bethlehem J.G., 2009, The Rise of Survey Sampling
- Börsch‐Supan A., 2004, Correcting the Participation Bias in an Online Survey
- Bowley A.L., 1926, Measurement of the precision attained in sampling, Bull. Int. Statist. Inst., 6
- Cobben F., 2004, Nonresponse Correction Techniques in Household Surveys at Statistics Netherlands: a CAPI‐CATI Comparison
- Cochran W.G., 1953, Sampling Techniques
- Cochran W.G., 1977, Sampling Techniques
- De Haan J., 2006, Jaarboek ICT en Samenleving, De Digitale Generatie
- Eurostat, 2007, More than 40% of Households have Broadband Internet Access
- Hansen M.H., 1953, Survey Sampling Methods and Theory
- Kendall M.G., 1960, Where shall the history of statistics begin, Biometrika, 47, 447
- Kiaer A. N., 1895, Observations et Expériences Concernant des Dénombrements Représentatives, Bull. Internat. Statist. Inst., 176
- Kiaer A. N., 1997, Den Repräsentative Undersökelsesmetode, Christiania Videnskabsselskabets Skrifter. II. Historiskfilosofiske klasse, 4, 37
- Kish L., 1967, Survey Sampling
- Kuusela V., 2003, Proceedings of the 4th ASC International Conference, 317
- 10.1111/j.2397-2335.1934.tb04184.x · DOI
- Scherpenzeel A., 2010, Social Research and the Internet: Advances in applied Methods and New Research Strategies
- Terhanian G., 2001, Exploiting analytical advances: Minimizing the biases associated with Internet‐based surveys of non‐random samples, ESOMAR Publication Services, 248, 247
- Vonk T., 2006, The effects of panel recruitment and management on research results, a study among 19 online panels, ESOMAR Publication Services, 317, 79
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,000
Park, S., Gim, J., Kim, S. I., & Kim, H. (2025) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2025.101300 · Cited by 5
Calliyeris, V. E., & Casas, A. L. L. (2012) · Interações (Campo Grande) · doi:10.1590/s1518-70122012000100002 · Cited by 3
Cash, B. D., & Moncrief, M. B. C. (2019) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.14309/01.ajg.0000591668.99204.58 · Cited by 3
Rueda, M. D. M. (2019) · Test · doi:10.1007/s11749-019-00683-1 · Cited by 3
“In this respect, Bethlehem (2010) showed that bias can be reduced through calibration only when non-response due to volunteering has a missing at random scheme, and that this approach is not valid in other situations (which are the most frequent).”
BackgroundGilmore, K. S. (2013) · Syracuse University Libraries (Syracuse University) · Cited by 3
Conducting a large survey of critical care nurses in Canada: Lessons learnt
Luk, E., & Rose, L. (2011) · Intensive and Critical Care Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.iccn.2011.04.004 · Cited by 3
Statistical methods for reducing bias in web surveys
Lee, M. H. (2011) · Summit (Simon Fraser University) · Cited by 3
Pueyo‐Ros, J., Ribas, A., & Fraguell, R. M. (2017) · Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles · doi:10.21138/bage.2501 · Cited by 3
“The answers to question three were ordered randomly to avoid a selection bias (Bethlehem, 2010).”
BackgroundAdianto, J., & Gabe, R. T. (2021) · Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment · doi:10.1080/10911359.2021.1983496 · Cited by 3
“ment is conducted to reduce the inevitable bias by comparing the socio-demographic characteristics of the general population and the participating respondents as bias checks (Bethlehem, 2010; Khan, 2018).”
MethodWhat do patients expect from physiotherapists in private clinics? A classical grounded theory study
Jensen, L., Rasmussen, T. E., & Lindahl, M. (2022) · European Journal of Physiotherapy · doi:10.1080/21679169.2022.2059104 · Cited by 3
Wehden, L.-O., Reer, F., Janzik, R., & Quandt, T. (2021) · Sexual Health & Compulsivity · doi:10.1080/26929953.2022.2032514 · Cited by 2
“This recruitment method is more prone to bias than probabilistic sampling (Bethlehem, 2010; Lehdonvirta, Oksanen, Räsänen, & Blank, 2021).”
MethodDeng, Y., Han, S., Liu, J., Guo, L., Feng, L., Liao, Y., Peng, Z.-X., Ren, L., Yang, W., & Wang, J. (2023) · Journal of Infection · doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2023.02.033 · Cited by 3
“Lancet Infect Dis 2021; 21(2): 203-12.”
Tackling the Problem of Self Selection in the Integration of Different Data Collection Techniques.Preprint
Camillo, F., & D’Attoma, I. (2011) · AMS Acta (University of Bologna) · doi:10.6092/unibo/amsacta/3063 · Cited by 3
GGP Technical Case & E-NeedsPreprint
Emery, T., Cabaço, S. L. F., Lugtig, P. J., Toepoel, V., Lück, D., Naderi, R., Schumann, A., & Bujard, M. (2019) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/439wc · Cited by 3
Zapata-Román, G., Energici, M.-A., Alarcón‐Arcos, S., & Moller, F. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3112667/v1 · Cited by 3
Enquêter à distance sur le bien-être des collégiens
Mercier, C., Zanna, O., & Florin, A. (2022) · Socio-anthropologie · doi:10.4000/socio-anthropologie.11434 · Cited by 2
Understanding the Mental Health Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Railway Workers
Cogan, N. A., McGibbon, M., Gardiner, A., & Morton, L. (2022) · Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1097/jom.0000000000002711 · Cited by 3
Adianto, J., Gabe, R. T., & Hernowo, B. (2024) · Environment and Urbanization Asia · doi:10.1177/09754253241234698 · Cited by 2
“Generalization of results had to be limited, as online surveys contained inherent biases due to the lack of control over the participation mechanism (Fricker, 2008), the under-representation of certain demographic groups (Bethlehem, 2010) and slow responses from respondents (Cervantes et al., 2009).”
ResultUncovering the Impact of Digitalization on the Performance of Insurance Distribution
Köhne, T., & Köhne, M. (2024) · Risks · doi:10.3390/risks12080129 · Cited by 11
“Regarding methodological aspects, a selection bias can occur due to the use of web survey design because web surveys rely on the self-selection of respondents (Bethlehem 2010).”
BackgroundFactors Influencing Consumption of Animal-Based Dairy and Plant-Based Milk Alternatives in Australia
Tulysewski, G., Hendrie, G. A., Baird, D., Umberger, W. J., & Malek, L. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16167168 · Cited by 2
“Self-selection bias can prompt respondents with a particular interest in the survey topic to respond, causing non-random sample recruitment [43].”
BackgroundMakan, K., Garrido‐Cumbrera, M., Toit, R. D., Correa-Fernández, J., van Dam, M., & Tikly, M. (2024) · Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1007/s10067-024-07151-8 · Cited by 2
“Thirdly, patients from lower socio-economic groups tend to have less access to the internet and social media [36], further exaggerating the sample bias in favor of the more affluent Caucasian South Africans.”
BackgroundSugisawa, H., Harada, K., Sugihara, Y., Yanagisawa, S., Shinmei, M., & Kitajima, H. (2024) · The International Journal of Aging and Human Development · doi:10.1177/00914150241297395 · Cited by 2
“This may be because we collected data using a web survey, as older adults tend to have less access to the Internet than young or middle-aged adults (Bethlehem, 2010).”
Mapping Children’s Social and Motor Skill Profiles to Autistic Traits and Behavioral Tendencies
Benson, S. M. S., Salters, D., & Benson, A. J. (2025) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-025-06780-5 · Cited by 3
“Given convenience sampling was employed, the likelihood of self-selection bias was high (Bethlehem, 2010).”
Costa, I. B., Rosa, P. J., & Pascoal, P. M. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13070843 · Cited by 2
“However, it offers efficient data collection, broader geographic reach, and increased sample diversity [44].”
Larraechea, M., Santos, A. D., Cerda, C., Alegría-Morán, R. A., & Briceño, C. (2025) · Preventive Veterinary Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2025.106577 · Cited by 2
Burrill, J., Dannevig, H., & Brendehaug, E. (2025) · Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism · doi:10.1080/15022250.2025.2508711 · Cited by 2
“In addition, the assumption of random sampling in each glacial site may not hold due to a self-selection bias and may limit the generalizability of our results (Bethlehem, 2010).”
Peak policy lab or chasing windmills? The overlooked issue of misaligned policy design
WELLSTEAD, A. M., Giest, S. N., Mukherjee, I., Gofen, A., & Evans, B. M. (2025) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11077-025-09577-6 · Cited by 2
“Similarly, the saturation of surveys means that they are increasingly subject to low response rates, non-response bias, and selection bias (Bethlehem 2010; Christian et al. 2014; Calle-goro et al. 2015).”
The concept of digital adaptability of nurses and midwives: A factor analysis
Bleijenbergh, R., Mestdagh, E., Rompaey, B. V., Timmermans, O., & Kuipers, Y. (2025) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104430 · Cited by 2
La calidad de la encuesta en la sociedad digital: Avances y retrocesos
D'Ancona, M. Á. C. (2025) · Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas · doi:10.5477/cis/reis.191.25-42 · Cited by 2
Media and anxiety in consumer behavior and its effect on decision making during turbulent situations
Santos‐Corrada, M., Flecha-Ortiz, J. A., López, E., Dones, V., Soto, M. O., Mena-Candelaria, S., & Melendez, L. (2025) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/13527266.2025.2527241 · Cited by 2
Oh, J., & Rydin, Y. (2025) · Planning Practice and Research · doi:10.1080/02697459.2025.2528129 · Cited by 2
“Additionally, the study faced potential self-selection (Bethlehem, 2010) and social desirability bias (Tourangeau & Yan, 2007) due to the nature of the research methodology, potentially skewing the results.”
Public Awareness and Knowledge of Prostate Cancer Screening: A Community Study in Saudi Arabia
Kandasamy, G., Orayj, K. M., Asiri, Y. I., Shorog, E., Alshahrani, A. M., & Alenazi, H. A. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13161962 · Cited by 2
“Aligning these efforts with international screening guidelines, such as those from the American Cancer Society and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [45–47], can further bolster national prevention efforts.”
de Sá, A. L. S., Lavieri, P. S., & Pitombo, C. S. (2025) · Latin American Transport Studies · doi:10.1016/j.latran.2025.100042 · Cited by 2
The face of the Canadian riding lesson industry—common management practices and industry opinions
Copelin, C., & Merkies, K. (2025) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1139/cjas-2025-0008 · Cited by 2
Kissi, P. S. (2025) · AIDS Care · doi:10.1080/09540121.2025.2562460 · Cited by 2
“Offline recruitment in low-connectivity areas was used to reduce overrepresentation of digitally literate participants (Bethlehem, 2010).”
Assumptions about behaviour influence the policy preferences of public officials
Dewies, M., de‐Wit, L., & Reisch, L. A. (2025) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2025.2570408 · Cited by 2
“This may reflect self-selection bias, a common issue in survey research (Bethlehem 2010).”
Farooq, A. S., Javid, M. A., & Masoud, A. R. (2025) · Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.trip.2025.101693 · Cited by 2
Keister, A., Stephens, S. W., Adelgais, K., Bosson, N., Brown, K., Elsholz, C. L., Faris, G. W., Frey, J. A., Gausche‐Hill, M., Goldkind, S. F., et al. (2025) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/acem.70189 · Cited by 2
Abdoli, M., Carraturo, F., Afzaal, D. F., Cotrufo, P., & Cella, S. (2025) · Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity · doi:10.1007/s40519-025-01795-4 · Cited by 2
“Although it included a range of ages and both genders, it may not represent people from other cultures or with different demographic backgrounds and may be affected by selection bias typical of nonprobability web surveys [95].”
When GenAI writes public foresight reports: Effects on convincing citizens
Zumbrunn, L., & Guenduez, A. A. (2025) · Public Policy and Administration · doi:10.1177/09520767251403049 · Cited by 4
“While we took the necessary steps to ensure the data quality of the responses, there are certain inherent aspects such as sampling and representativeness issues or self-selection bias (Bethlehem, 2010).”
Ramos, K., Velázquez, O. C., & Lozano-Ramirez, J. (2025) · International Journal of Tourism Cities · doi:10.1080/20565607.2025.2599898 · Cited by 2
Suraj Begum, R., Saravana Mahesan, S., Min, J., Divya, D., & Sakkan, T. (2025) · Asian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research · doi:10.54392/ajir25417 · Cited by 3
“First, the method of sampling and recruitment-a digitally distributed survey-is likely to have generated a selection bias by excluding students without stable access to the internet or with poor devices (Bethlehem, 2010).”
Online Survey Researchers’ Experience With Fraudulent Responders
Schuster, A. M., Agrawal, S., Watson, G. P., & Cotten, S. R. (2026) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440261424005 · Cited by 2
“…both human and bot fraudulent responders have malicious intent and deliberately misrepresent themselves, which is often done to receive monetary benefit from online survey participation incentives (Bethlehem, 2010; Hulland & Miller, 2018; Kumarasamy et al., 2024; Lawlor et al., 2021; Wright, 2005).”
Treves, L. T., Hallikas, J., & Pynnönen, M. (2026) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-08-2025-0758 · Cited by 2
Salem, M. R. M., Azam, A. H. M., & Zainuddin, S. A. (2026) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-026-01288-y · Cited by 2
“This mixed-mode and quota-based strategy helps mitigate selection and coverage biases while ensuring that the sample reflects the diversity of banking professionals across the ASEAN-5 region [11, 20, 25].”
Abu-Alhaija, A. S., & Elsawy, M. M. (2026) · Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research · doi:10.3390/jtaer21050156 · Cited by 2
“This limitation is consistent with previous studies suggesting that self-selected samples, especially in sustainability and digital environments, may yield upward-biased estimates due to respondents’ pre-existing attitudes and engagement levels [49,50].”
Exploring student use of generative AI in higher education: A dual-institutional study
Nygren, Å., Eriksson, A., Sjöberg, J., & Alégroth, E. (2026) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-026-14100-2 · Cited by 5
“The generalizability of the findings may be limited by convenience sampling bias (Bethlehem, 2010).”
Using Web Panels for Official Statistics
Bethlehem, J. G. (2014) · Cited by 2
Self-citationRestraint of dogs in vehicles in the US, UK and Australia
Hazel, S. J., Kogan, L. R., Montrose, V. T., Hebart, M. L., & Oxley, J. A. (2019) · Preventive Veterinary Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104714 · Cited by 2
“394 Use of a convenience sample for online surveys is unlikely to be representative of the total 395 population (Bethlehem 2010), and this research needs to be repeated in a representative 396 sample of dog owners.”
Massonnat-Modolo, I., Chevalier, A., & Chollier, M. (2020) · Sexologies · doi:10.1016/j.sexol.2020.06.003 · Cited by 2
DOES BREASTFEEDING OR NOT AFFECT A BETTER MATERNAL QUALITY OF LIFE? : LITERATURE REVIEW
Oktaviya, A. R., Hardianto, G., Utomo, B., & Wittiarika, I. D. (2020) · SEAJOM The Southeast Asia Journal of Midwifery · doi:10.36749/seajom.v6i2.126 · Cited by 2
“This can be a procedural bias because not all respondents have the ability and experience of working with computers so that it may cause misunderstanding, cognitive limitations, and others (Bethlehem, 2010).”
BackgroundDagnes, J., Carbone, D., Barberis, E., & Bazzoli, N. (2021) · STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI · doi:10.3280/so2021-001003 · Cited by 2
Breeze, T., & Beauchamp, G. (2021) · British Journal of Music Education · doi:10.1017/s0265051721000188 · Cited by 2
“Such responses are not unusual in online survey as respondents self-select whether to participate (Bethlehem, 2010).”
Baumeister, V. M., Hossiep, C. R., Wiemann, M. L., & Schewe, G. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72945-5_7 · Cited by 2
Characteristics of Psychologists Assessing Deaf and Hard of Hearing Clients
Wilkins, A. M., Morere, D. A., Pick, L. H., Day, L. A., & Anderson, M. L. (2021) · The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education · doi:10.1093/deafed/enab039 · Cited by 2
Tael‐Öeren, M., Jordan, I., Coughlin, D., & Turnbull, S. (2022) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/25715 · Cited by 2
“Ultimately, we interviewed everyone who expressed interest by the end of the study, thus potentially introducing self-selection bias [71].”
BackgroundKnapová, L., Šmahel, D., Dědková, L., & Matyáš, V. (2022) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/2022/3107621 · Cited by 2
“Online survey research has been on the rise in recent decades along with the growing numbers of information and communication technology (ICT) users around the world [1, 2].”
BackgroundSchultz, M., Chiavaroli, L., Healy, J. M., Lim, K. F., & Wevill, T. (2022) · International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.30722/ijisme.30.05.002 · Cited by 2
Shrestha, S., Wells, Y., While, C., & Rahman, M. A. (2023) · Journal of Aging and Health · doi:10.1177/08982643231183466 · Cited by 2
“Online surveys are mainly responded to by those who are electronic-literate, have internet access, and are interested in the subject (Andrade, 2020; Bethlehem, 2010).”
BackgroundThe Distribution and Disengagement of Women Contributors in Open-Source: 2008–2021
Zhao, Z. H. (2023) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1109/icse-companion58688.2023.00082 · Cited by 2
“While survey data can capture contributors’ self-identified gender [4], the survey samples are usually too small to generalize to the entire population and can introduce selection bias [5].”
BackgroundZhu, T., Gamble, L. J., Klapman, M., Xue, L., & Lesser, V. M. (2023) · Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology · doi:10.1093/jssam/smad032 · Cited by 2
Dechawatanapaisal, D. (2023) · Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health · doi:10.1080/15555240.2023.2284691 · Cited by 2
“…online survey techniques can result in sampling selection bias, which can inflate the findings of this study as it does not follow the principles of probability sampling, such as bias estimates, lack of representativeness, and researcher’s loss of control over the sampling method (Bethlehem, 2010).”
Discriminative machine learning for maximal representative subsampling
Hauptmann, T., Fellenz, S., Nathan, L., Tüscher, O., & Krämer, S. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-48177-3 · Cited by 5
Associations Between Personality and Mental Health Among Royal Canadian Mounted Police Cadets
Andrews, K. L., Jamshidi, L., Nisbet, J., Afifi, T. O., Sauer-Zavala, S. E., Krätzig, G. P., Teckchandani, T. A., Neary, J. P., & Carleton, R. N. (2024) · Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1007/s11896-023-09639-6 · Cited by 4
Does social empathy moderate fear-induced minority blaming during the COVID-19 pandemic?
Yoo, N., & Jang, S. H. (2024) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116719 · Cited by 2
Gesselman, A. N., Kaufman, E. M., Weeks, L. Y. S., Moscovici, Z., Bennett‐Brown, M., Adams, O. R., Campbell, J. T., Piazza, M., Bhuyan, L., Dubé, S., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1292603 · Cited by 2
Valdiviezo‐Oña, J., Ortíz, E. L., Paz, C., González, E. H., Macías-Esparza, L. K., & Güitrón, C. M. (2024) · Acta Universitaria · doi:10.15174/au.2024.3952 · Cited by 2
“De manera más amplia, este tipo de muestreo puede no representar con precisión a la población objetivo (Bethlehem, 2010).”
BackgroundGurevich, N., & Osmelak, D. R. (2024) · Advances in Communication and Swallowing · doi:10.3233/acs-240002 · Cited by 2
Crowdsourcing applications for monitoring the urban environment
Velázquez, M. V., Faka, A., & Kounadi, O. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-13605-4.00015-1 · Cited by 2
Pérez-Barbería, F. J., Brewer, M., & Gordon, I. J. (2024) · AMBIO · doi:10.1007/s13280-024-02084-7 · Cited by 2
Sanitnarathorn, P., Oentoro, W., Thummapol, O., & Thongma, S. (2024) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2024.2447423 · Cited by 4
“…given this, it is expected that the findings from thai elder consumers can be applied to other elderly customers. the online survey approach was used because it can quickly reach a large sample to portray consumer opinion on some issues rapidly (Bethlehem, 2010) and is cost effective (Jason, 2012).”
Nieuwoudt, J. E., Andrews, G., Quinn, R. K., & Syme, S. (2025) · Studies in the Education of Adults · doi:10.1080/02660830.2025.2463222 · Cited by 2
“However, it is difficult to determine the impact of any type of selection bias due to the information of non-participants not available, and comparisons between participants and non-participants are not feasible (Bethlehem 2010).”
AAPM WGWMRSC Report 420: chapter climate check: Mixed methods analysis of survey responses
Cetnar, A. J., Aldosary, G., Koo, M. C., Lincoln, H., Pérez-Andújar, A., Prajapati, S., Simiele, S. J., & Hendrickson, K. R. G. (2025) · Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/acm2.14600 · Cited by 2
“9,10 Within this survey, we note that positive responses in the open-ended questions were either absent or brief, lacking specific details.”
Buchmayr, F., & Krouwel, A. (2025) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.13085 · Cited by 3
“In order to diminish bias and measurement error occurring from online, non-probability sampling (Bethlehem, 2010; Hooghe & Teepe, 2007), the data have been weighted by post-stratification and iterative proportional fitting (see Rao et al., 2002; Valliant, 1993, which accounts for respondents’ age,…”
Wilson, C., Ballantyne, C. J., & Hawkins, R. D. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15040419 · Cited by 2
“Although there are benefits to online research, it must be acknowledged that there was potential for self-selection bias (Bethlehem, 2010).”
Dechawatanapaisal, D. (2025) · Journal of Organizational Change Management · doi:10.1108/jocm-04-2024-0232 · Cited by 4
Training on Childhood Apraxia of Speech: Experiences of Speech-Language Pathologists
Keller, S., Valentine, H., Harel, D., & Grigos, M. I. (2025) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2025_ajslp-24-00224 · Cited by 2
Afzal, F., Wong, L. Y. F., Purkayastha, M., Lu, Y., Rees, P., Richard, M. A., Williams, C. L., Lupo, P. J., Luke, B., & Sutcliffe, A. G. (2026) · Human Fertility · doi:10.1080/14647273.2026.2666204 · Cited by 2
“Voluntary participation may have introduced self-selection bias (Bethlehem, 2010), with individuals who had more adverse experiences being more likely to respond to the optional open-ended questions and thus being potentially overrepresented (Redshaw et al., 2007).”
Bognár, Z., Kawaguchi, Y., Nakamura, K., & Kubinyi, E. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-16562-9 · Cited by 3
Alternative selection mechanisms in online surveys
Prücklmair, F., & Rendtel, U. (2025) · AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv · doi:10.1007/s11943-025-00362-8 · Cited by 2
“This includes individual usage styles, like posting on social media, and motivational factors (Bethlehem 2010).”
InfluentialWilliams, B. (2019) · SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University) · Cited by 2
Dark Triad traits and attitudes toward communication and coordination in seafarers
Jakšić, K., Bielić, T., & Čulin, J. (2021) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.111091 · Cited by 2
Empleo y brecha digital de género en América Latina
Galperín, H., & Arcidiácono, M. (2020) · Revista Latinoamericana de Economía y Sociedad Digital · doi:10.53857/gept8927 · Cited by 2
“…a través de entrevistas personales es crítica para los propósitos de este estudio, ya que los métodos de recolección que se basan en tecnologías de la información (tales como paneles en línea o muestreo telefónico aleatorio) pueden producir estimaciones sesgadas del uso de TIC (Bethlehem 2010).”
BackgroundRevisiting Prostate Cancer Screening Practices Among Vermont Primary Care Physicians
Donnelly, L., Sternberg, K., Ashikaga, T., PLANTE, M. K., & Perrapato, S. D. (2017) · Journal of Community Health · doi:10.1007/s10900-017-0384-x · Cited by 2
“Self-selection web surveys have been shown to yield results which suffer from significant bias, rendering conclusions drawn from such surveys questionable [12].”
BackgroundBabich, N. S., & Владимирович, Б. И. (2020) · Sociology and Law · doi:10.35854/2219-6242-2020-3-25-33 · Cited by 2
Özçelik, R., Remy‐Wohlfender, F., Küker, S., Visschers, V. H. M., Hadorn, D. C., & Dürr, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2021.641448 · Cited by 2
“However, selection bias is expected to be prevalent for the online survey, as it is the case in most voluntary questionnaire-based studies (44, 45), which may have led to an overestimation of the equine community’s rather positive intention.”
BackgroundAlves, D. A., Craveiro, I. M. R., Basabe, N., & Gonçalves, L. A. P. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048818 · Cited by 3
Chiropractic lecturer qualities: The student perspective
Chesterton, P. (2022) · Journal of Chiropractic Education · doi:10.7899/jce-21-7 · Cited by 2
Impact of Covid-19 on Survey Methods and Challenges
Kim, K.-S. (2021) · American Journal of Biomedical Science & Research · doi:10.34297/ajbsr.2021.14.002011 · Cited by 2
Antecedents of Self-Protective Behavior during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Bangladesh
Khanam, L., Sorwar, G., & Mahfuz, M. A. (2022) · WHO South-East Asia Journal of Public Health · doi:10.4103/who-seajph.who-seajph_172_21 · Cited by 2
Loa, P., Ong, F., & Habib, K. N. (2023) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.1177/03611981231155434 · Cited by 2
“The under-representation of older individuals and those from lower-income households tends to be observed in web-based surveys ( 56 ) and is likely exacerbated by the focus on those with pre-pandemic ride-sourcing experience in this study.”
The show must go on: proposals to measure the economic value of Grassroots Music Venues
Guarisa, M. L. Z., de Figueiredo, J. L., & Machado, A. F. (2023) · Cultural Trends · doi:10.1080/09548963.2023.2193874 · Cited by 2
“However, as Bethelehem (2010) shows, web surveys are increasingly replacing other formats, including face-to-face surveys, due to some advantages like low cost, agility to launch the survey and reduction of the time needed to treat data.”
BackgroundBinter, J., Hladký, T., Machová, K., Říha, D., & Boschetti, S. (2023) · Ceskoslovenska psychologie · doi:10.51561/cspsych.67.2.82 · Cited by 2
Problemas relacionados con las encuestas preelectorales desde una perspectiva comparada
Traugott, M. W. (2015) · Estudios Públicos · doi:10.38178/cep.vi138.205 · Cited by 2
Monitoring Health and Well-Being in Emerging Adults: Protocol for a Pilot Longitudinal Cohort Study
Lystad, R. P., Pulido, D. F., Peters, L., Johnstone, M., Ellis, L. A., Braithwaite, J., Wuthrich, V. M., Amin, J., Cameron, C. M., & Mitchell, R. J. (2020) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/16108 · Cited by 2
“Although self-selection can lead to unreliable survey outcomes [37], there are potential methods for correcting for selection biases (eg, poststratification or weighting class adjustments, propensity score adjustments, and generalized regression modelling [38]).”
MethodIs it all about knowledge? A survey of attitudes toward ADHD among German pediatricians
Fechner, M. E., Mazheika, Y., Fehr, F., Jung, R., & Borusiak, P. (2022) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1007/s10389-022-01758-4 · Cited by 2
“These are known to lead to insufficient data quality in voluntary online surveys (Bethlehem 2010).”
BackgroundMixed-Use Urban Planning and Development
Kusumastuti, D., & Nicholson, A. (2017) · UC Research Repository (University of Canterbury) · Cited by 2
Ettlin, L., Nast, I., Huber, E. O., & Niedermann, K. (2020) · doi:10.21203/rs.2.20763/v1 · Cited by 2
The siren's song of anonymous web‐based sampling
Brasky, T. M., Krok‐Schoen, J. L., Conroy, S., Newton, A. M., Strassels, S. A., Hays, J. L., & Wagener, T. L. (2022) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.34097 · Cited by 2
“Although the authors note that the study is subject to several biases that are common to survey designs, they do not clarify that this study is especially subject to biases that are inherent in web- based convenience sampling, particularly when one is drawing from individual websites.(2,3) Indeed, the authors report a…”
BackgroundVariation in gaze understanding across the life span: A process-level perspectivePreprint
Prein, J. C., Maurits, L., Werwach, A., Haun, D. B. M., & Bohn, M. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/dy73a · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Bethlehem, J.
- Affiliations
- Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Bethlehem, Jelke
- Venue
- International Statistical Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-188
- ISSN
- 0306-7734 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-5823
- OpenAlex
- W2129332419
- Cited by
- 1,315
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 228 · 2025: 173 · 2024: 151 · 2023: 149 · 2022: 122 · 2021: 144 · 2020: 109 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 29.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Statistical Review (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Census and Population Estimation
- Keywords
- online surveys, selection bias, undercoverage, self-selection, internet access, survey design, participant recruitment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review