The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Selection Bias in Web Surveys
Open accessAbstract
Summary: At first sight, web surveys seem to be an interesting and attractive means of data collection. They provide simple, cheap, and fast access to a large group of potential respondents. However, web surveys are not without methodological problems. Specific groups in the populations are under‐represented because they have less access to Internet. Furthermore, recruitment of respondents is often based on self‐selection. Both under‐coverage and self‐selection may lead to biased estimates. This paper describes these methodological problems. It also explores the effect of various correction techniques (adjustment weighting and use of reference surveys). This all leads to the question whether properly design web surveys can be used for data collection. The paper attempts to answer this question. It concludes that under‐coverage problems may solve itself in the future, but that self‐selection leads to unreliable survey outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The reliability and validity of web-based self-reported mental disorder symptom clusters remains ambiguous,71 certainly for the current population”
From Mental Disorder Symptoms among Public Safety Personnel in Canada (2018) · cites this paper as [71]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In contrast, the current rates may be inflated because of a self-selection bias of motivated responding by clinically symptomatic persons.71”
From Mental Disorder Symptoms among Public Safety Personnel in Canada (2018) · cites this paper as [71]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
ROSENBAUM, P. R., & RUBIN, D. B. (1983) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · Cited by 31,241
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Lahiff, M., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289883 · Cited by 17,385
Statistical Analysis with Missing Data
Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119013563 · Cited by 8,473
Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2008) · Cited by 5,345
A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe
Horvitz, D. G., & Thompson, D. J. (1952) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1952.10483446 · Cited by 4,293
Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1984.10478078 · Cited by 3,082
A Generalization of Sampling Without Replacement From a Finite Universe
Horvitz, D. G., & Thompson, D. J. (1952) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2280784 · Cited by 3,011
Couper, M. P. (2000) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/318641 · Cited by 2,086
Neyman, J. (1934) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society · doi:10.2307/2342192 · Cited by 1,086
The Effectiveness of Adjustment by Subclassification in Removing Bias in Observational Studies
Cochran, W. G. (1968) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2528036 · Cited by 961
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Bethlehem J.G., 1988, Reduction of the nonresponse bias through regression estimation, J. Official Statist., 4, 251
- Bethlehem J.G., 2002, Survey Nonresponse
- Bethlehem J.G., 2009, The Rise of Survey Sampling
- Börsch‐Supan A., 2004, Correcting the Participation Bias in an Online Survey
- Bowley A.L., 1926, Measurement of the precision attained in sampling, Bull. Int. Statist. Inst., 6
- Cobben F., 2004, Nonresponse Correction Techniques in Household Surveys at Statistics Netherlands: a CAPI‐CATI Comparison
- Cochran W.G., 1953, Sampling Techniques
- Cochran W.G., 1977, Sampling Techniques
- De Haan J., 2006, Jaarboek ICT en Samenleving, De Digitale Generatie
- Eurostat, 2007, More than 40% of Households have Broadband Internet Access
- Hansen M.H., 1953, Survey Sampling Methods and Theory
- Kendall M.G., 1960, Where shall the history of statistics begin, Biometrika, 47, 447
- Kiaer A. N., 1895, Observations et Expériences Concernant des Dénombrements Représentatives, Bull. Internat. Statist. Inst., 176
- Kiaer A. N., 1997, Den Repräsentative Undersökelsesmetode, Christiania Videnskabsselskabets Skrifter. II. Historiskfilosofiske klasse, 4, 37
- Kish L., 1967, Survey Sampling
- Kuusela V., 2003, Proceedings of the 4th ASC International Conference, 317
- 10.1111/j.2397-2335.1934.tb04184.x · DOI
- Scherpenzeel A., 2010, Social Research and the Internet: Advances in applied Methods and New Research Strategies
- Terhanian G., 2001, Exploiting analytical advances: Minimizing the biases associated with Internet‐based surveys of non‐random samples, ESOMAR Publication Services, 248, 247
- Vonk T., 2006, The effects of panel recruitment and management on research results, a study among 19 online panels, ESOMAR Publication Services, 317, 79
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,000
Hayden, K., Graham, M., & Haintz, G. L. (2016) · Health Promotion Journal of Australia · doi:10.1071/he15113 · Cited by 7
Does the delivery matter? Examining randomization at the item level
Buchanan, E. M., Foreman, R. E., Johnson, B. N., Pavlacic, J. M., Swadley, R. N., & Schulenberg, S. E. (2018) · Behaviormetrika · doi:10.1007/s41237-018-0055-y · Cited by 10
“Other potential limitations to online surveys include the accessibility of different populations to the Internet (Frick et al. 2001), selection bias (Bethlehem 2010), response rates (Cantrell and Lupinacci 2007; Cook et al. 2000; De Leeuw and Hox 1988; Hox and De Leeuw 1994), attrition (Cronk and…”
BackgroundTzelos, T., Howes, N. L., Esteves, C. L., Howes, M. P., Byrne, T. J., Macrae, A., & Donadeu, F. X. (2020) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2020.564209 · Cited by 7
“Self-selected participants are usually members of the general sample population that are especially concerned about the topic under survey and also have stronger opinions about it (15); they may also be more willing to consider implementing changes (or recommend changes to their clients) in order to improve dairy husb…”
BackgroundTsourela, M. (2022) · Managing Sport and Leisure · doi:10.1080/23750472.2022.2058070 · Cited by 7
“The first limitation of this research is the fact that the data were gathered using convenience sampling technique, thus it can cause selection biases (Bethlehem, 2010).”
BackgroundPublic opinion on connected and automated vehicles: the Czech context
Gabrhel, V., Ježek, S., & Havlíčková, D. (2020) · Transactions on Transport Sciences · doi:10.5507/tots.2019.011 · Cited by 7
“Furthermore, it may be impossible to create a list of all members within the respective population to sample from (Bethlehem, 2010).”
BackgroundImplementation of a Mentoring Program for Mentee-Mentor Satisfaction: A Longitudinal Pilot Study
David, M., & Pitman, M. A. (2024) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-024-01994-1 · Cited by 10
“Firstly, surveys were done via an online questionnaire, thus generating concerns regarding potential selection and reporting biases [36, 37].”
Dzierzewski, J. M., & Nielson, S. A. (2024) · Sleep Health · doi:10.1016/j.sleh.2024.10.008 · Cited by 6
Jiang, L., Yan, J., Xie, Y., & Dong, J.-F. (2025) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104150 · Cited by 5
Iragorri, N., Ali, S., Mishra, S., & Sander, B. (2025) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2025.06.021 · Cited by 6
Esports, mental toughness, & resilience: Psychological predictors of performance may fall short
Young, M. G., Poulus, D., & Adie, J. M. (2025) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.103016 · Cited by 9
A model for promoting entrepreneurial skills in higher education: evidence from Jordan
Halalsheh, N. Z., Almomani, L. M., Al-Shyyab, Y. M., Al-Abdallat, Y., Tarawneh, H. H., & Alassaf, F. (2026) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2025.2610037 · Cited by 6
Stickley, A., Shirama, A., Inagawa, T., Ruchkin, V. V., Koposov, R. A., Isaksson, J., Inoue, Y., & Sumiyoshi, T. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1008290 · Cited by 6
Stefens, M., Rondeel, E. W. M., Templin, J. L., Brode, D., de Waart, E., de Jong, R. D., ten Hoeve-Rozema, J., Waringa, A., Reijnders, J. S. A. M., Jacobs, N., et al. (2022) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-022-00968-5 · Cited by 6
“Because non-probability sampling often involves a biased sample with findings that cannot be generalized to the general population [78], future studies should replicate our findings by recruiting a random sample of coachees that may be more representative of the general population of coachees.”
ResultMethods to Counter Self-Selection Bias in Estimations of the Distribution Function and Quantiles
Rueda, M. D. M., Martínez, S., & Castro-Martín, L. (2022) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math10244726 · Cited by 6
Personality Profiles of Royal Canadian Mounted Police Cadets Starting the Cadet Training Program
Andrews, K. L., Jamshidi, L., Nisbet, J., Teckchandani, T. A., Afifi, T. O., Sauer-Zavala, S. E., Krätzig, G. P., & Carleton, R. N. (2023) · Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1007/s11896-022-09564-0 · Cited by 6
Supplisson, O., Charmet, T., Galmiche, S., Schaeffer, L., Chény, O., Lévy, A., Jeandet, N., Omar, F., David, C., Mailles, A., et al. (2023) · Eurosurveillance · doi:10.2807/1560-7917.es.2023.28.18.2200781 · Cited by 6
“Additional sources of selection bias may come from the Internet-based recruitment, which may decrease the participation of specific groups in the study [55].”
Attitudes of Mental Health Professionals towards Telepsychology during the Pandemic: A Pilot Study
Cavallo, M., Pedroli, E., Cantoia, M. E. A., McGrath, B., & Cecchetti, S. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11111542 · Cited by 6
“Conducting the survey online may have also caused a selection bias towards those who are already familiar with and who invested in the use of technology, resulting in a smaller number of older participants [72].”
BackgroundSchofield, I., & Jacklin, B. (2023) · Veterinary Record · doi:10.1002/vetr.3165 · Cited by 6
Effects of green nudges on consumer valuation of sustainable food: A discrete choice experiment
Gottselig, V., Wuppermann, A., & Herrmann, C. (2023) · GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society · doi:10.14512/gaia.32.2.6 · Cited by 6
“Furthermore, there may be a self-selection bias surrounding online surveys (Bethlehem 2010), and the topic of the survey may have attracted a specific group of individuals.”
BackgroundYoo, S., Lee, Y., Lee, Y., & Bae, T. J. (2023) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/10596011231215109 · Cited by 6
“Although we tested and con fi rmed that there was no difference between responding and non-responding, we acknowledge that self-selection may limit our fi ndings ’ generalizability (Bethlehem, 2010).”
Turnover intention among Vietnamese millennials in the workplace
Yang, Y., Hue, H. M. T., & Takeda, S. (2023) · Evidence-based HRM a Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship · doi:10.1108/ebhrm-12-2022-0302 · Cited by 6
Integrating probability and big non-probability samples data to produce Official Statistics
Golini, N., & Righi, P. (2024) · Statistical Methods & Applications · doi:10.1007/s10260-023-00740-y · Cited by 6
“Consequently, using them, for instance, to compute a simple mean of the observed values can lead to biased population mean estimates and erroneous conclusions, despite the large sample size (Bethlehem 2010; Vehovar et al. 2016; Meng 2018).”
Cost-Effective Acquisition of First-Party Data for Business Analytics
Liu, X., & Li, X. (2024) · INFORMS journal on computing · doi:10.1287/ijoc.2022.0037 · Cited by 6
Rasi, M., Hanssen, T. A., Norbye, B., Mikkonen, K., & Kvande, M. E. (2024) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106322 · Cited by 6
Who buys crop insurance? Predictors of the participation gap between organic and conventional farms
Belasco, E. J., & Fuller, K. B. (2021) · Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy · doi:10.1002/aepp.13187 · Cited by 6
Mooney, A., Wijeratne, C., Earl, J. K., & Gordon, J. (2021) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2021.100452 · Cited by 8
“Previous research suggests that voluntary participation in psychological research can lead to self-selection bias (Bethlehem, 2010), even in large population studies (Søgaard et al., 2004).”
BackgroundChesterton, P., Richardson, M. C., & Tears, C. (2022) · European Journal of Physiotherapy · doi:10.1080/21679169.2022.2093968 · Cited by 7
Hayes, L., Manyweathers, J., Maru, Y., Davis, E., Woodgate, R. G., & Hernández‐Jover, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2022.840346 · Cited by 6
“Self-selection bias is a criticism that has been directed toward online surveys (47) and while the researchers do not dispute this possibility, the key findings are considered to be relevant across the veterinary profession and show that even amongst an engaged population, there are barriers that need to be addressed.”
BackgroundThe Instagram Interview: Talking to People About Travel Experiences Across Online and Offline Spaces
Hugentobler, L. (2022) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v10i3.5340 · Cited by 6
“Self‐selecting into a research project means that partic‐ ipants are more interested in the topic than the aver‐ age person (Bethlehem, 2010).”
BackgroundLee, J. W., Park, S. J., & Han, D. H. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2143027 · Cited by 6
“Web-based self-Table selection surveys are vulnerable to a lack of probability sampling (Eysenbach & Wyatt, 2002; Bethlehem, 2010).”
Backgroundnternet gaming disorder, loneliness, and insomnia among Indians during the COVID-19 pandemic
Verma, S., Mishra, A., Pandehy, K. K., & Griffiths, M. D. (2022) · Journal of Concurrent Disorders · doi:10.54127/qlyd7570 · Cited by 6
Lehmann, N., Sloot, D., Schüle, C., Ardone, A., & Fïchtner, W. (2023) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106585 · Cited by 6
Hansen, K. T., Plouffe, R. A., Walker, D. L., Wanklyn, S. G., Lamrock, L., Maher, P., Nazarov, A., & Richardson, J. D. (2023) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-023-04687-y · Cited by 6
“Therefore Veterans’ spouses who do not have ready access to the internet, a computer, or smart phone/devices, or who are less familiar with the use of digital devices may be underrepresented in our sample [43].”
BackgroundStickley, A., Shirama, A., & Sumiyoshi, T. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1133779 · Cited by 6
“This may have increased the risk for selection bias (49) linked for example, to issues such as internet access.”
BackgroundGarrido, L. E., Peñaló-Sánchez, D., Abreu-Mariot, C., Lara-Caba, E. Z., Frías-Hiciano, M., Pérez-Estévez, L., & Martínez‐Molina, A. (2023) · Journal of Family Violence · doi:10.1007/s10896-023-00585-9 · Cited by 10
“This study shares important limitations inherent to all non-probabilistic online research of this nature, including limited representativeness and sampling bias due to self-selection (Bethlehem, 2010).”
Is everyone really middle class? Social class position and identification in Alberta
Maroto, M. L., Brown, D., & Durou, G. (2023) · Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie · doi:10.1111/cars.12444 · Cited by 9
The impact of COVID-19 on teleworking and commuting behavior—A literature review
Kalter, M.-J. O., Geurs, K., & Wismans, L. J. J. (2023) · Advances in transport policy and planning · doi:10.1016/bs.atpp.2023.07.004 · Cited by 5
Sánchez-Cantalejo, C., Conde, D. Y., Rueda, M. D. M., Lima, A. O. D. L., Martín-Ruiz, E., Callejón, C. H., & Cabrera‐León, A. (2023) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1217519 · Cited by 6
“By contrast, the main drawback of non-probability surveys is that they present significant issues in terms of selection and coverage biases, thus compromising the generalization of results to the study population (85).”
ResultDecision-making under crisis: insights from the health service sector
Doran, D., & Phan, T. C. (2024) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-11-2023-2177 · Cited by 6
Muszyński, M. A., Banasik‐Jemielniak, N., Żółtak, T., Rimfeld, K., Shakeshaft, N. G., Schofield, K. L., Malanchini, M., & Pokropek, A. (2025) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-025-02254-z · Cited by 6
“Research shows that online panel samples yield data of good quality and that the results are comparable to those of probability-based samples (Scheerpenzeel, 2018), with the exception of self-selection bias and undercoverage of certain groups (Bethlehem 2010).”
Mark, K. P., & Vrijmoed, L. L. P. (2016) · IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering · doi:10.1109/tale.2016.7851818 · Cited by 7
“It is, however, subject to self-selection bias [11].”
BackgroundRussell, L. B., & Hubley, A. M. (2017) · Social indicators research series · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-56129-5_13 · Cited by 6
Evaluation of an Academic Satisfaction Model for First-Year University Students
Zalazar-Jaime, M. F., Moretti, L. S., Losano, M. C., & Medrano, L. A. (2017) · Cited by 6
Banham-Hall, E., Allison, A., Santarsieri, A., Gohel, M., Crowley, M. P., Sheares, K. K. K., & Thomas, W. (2020) · Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis · doi:10.1007/s11239-020-02193-6 · Cited by 6
“There is clearly selection bias given that it is likely that only those that are specifically interested and are social media savvy have responded [23].”
BackgroundAdoption of direct discharge of simple stable injuries amongst (orthopaedic) trauma surgeons
Geerdink, T. H., Uijterwijk, B. A., Meijer, D. T., Sierevelt, I. N., Mallee, W. H., van Veen, R. N., Goslings, J. C., & Haverlag, R. (2020) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2020.11.026 · Cited by 6
Recovery following the extra-time period of soccer: practitioner perspectives and applied practices
Field, A., Corr, L. D., Thompson, C., Lucena, J. C. G., Sarmento, H., Naughton, R. J., Brownlee, T. E., Haines, M. R., Page, R. M., & Harper, L. D. (2021) · Biology of Sport · doi:10.5114/biolsport.2022.104066 · Cited by 7
Would You Rather Be Safe or Free? Motivational and Behavioral Aspects in COVID-19 Mitigation
Costantini, G., Sarno, M. D., Preti, E., Richetin, J., & Perugini, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635406 · Cited by 7
“This might have introduced biases in the parameter estimates (Bethlehem, 2010).”
BackgroundMinen, M. T., Kaplan, K., Akter, S., Khanns, D., Ostendorf, T., Rheaume, C. E., Friedman, S., & Wells, R. E. (2021) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000013259 · Cited by 6
A Two‐Step Procedure to Measure Representativeness of Internet Data Sources
Beręsewicz, M. (2017) · International Statistical Review · doi:10.1111/insr.12217 · Cited by 7
“Bethlehem (2010) show that self-selection can introduce substantial bias in comparison to the bias due to the coverage error.”
BackgroundMedia and Scientific Literacy Development within the Framework of Public Engagement with Science
(2020) · Mediaobrazovanie · doi:10.13187/me.2020.4.636 · Cited by 6
Giese, H., & König, L. M. (2024) · Journal of Trial and Error · doi:10.36850/28b4-4f59 · Cited by 10
Das, R. R., Sussman, R., & Carlson, R. W. (2025) · Energy and Climate Change · doi:10.1016/j.egycc.2025.100179 · Cited by 5
Inoue, Y., Kumagai, T., Shoji, A., Kokubo, K., & Honda, M. (2025) · Sleep Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2025.106496 · Cited by 5
The global role of bioassessment in policy delivery and decision-making for inland waters
KELLY, M. G., Free, G., Simaika, J. P., Warner, S., Bruder, A., Correa-Bedoya, A., Roque, F. D. O., Eriksen, T. E., Lento, J., Macadam, C. R., et al. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127099 · Cited by 5
Probst, T., Haid, B., Schimböck, W., Stippl, P., & Humer, E. C. (2021) · Psychotherapie Forum · doi:10.1007/s00729-021-00168-3 · Cited by 5
“Die Online-Durchführung könnte möglicherweise auch zu einem Selektionsbias geführt haben (Bethlehem 2010).”
BackgroundExploring Major League Baseball Fans’ Climate Change Risk Perceptions and Adaptation Willingness
Murfree, J. R. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15107980 · Cited by 7
Sun, R., Lam, L. W., & Wu, A. M. S. (2023) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-023-01247-7 · Cited by 8
“Third, recruiting participants through convenience sampling on the online data collection platform may have under-coverage bias by missing participants who did not register an account in this platform [96].”
BackgroundDesigning Robots for Marketplace Success: A Case Study with Technology for Behavior and Habit Change
Randall, N., & Šabanović, S. (2024) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-023-01093-y · Cited by 6
“In order to minimize self-selection bias [51, 52], participants were recruited by diverse means.”
Pettinicchio, D., & Maroto, M. L. (2024) · Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie · doi:10.1111/cars.12461 · Cited by 5
Gerhardt, E., & Baird, B. (2024) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci14050496 · Cited by 5
“The overrepresentation in this study is likely due to self-selection bias, disproportionately including individuals interested in lucid dreaming, dreaming, and meditation [77].”
BackgroundHammarberg, K., Bandyopadhyay, M., Nguyen, H. T. M., Cicuttini, F., Stanzel, K., Brown, H. L., Hickey, M., & Fisher, J. (2024) · Interactive Journal of Medical Research · doi:10.2196/60949 · Cited by 8
“Self-selection and lack of representation of people with limited or no access to the internet are known to contribute to selection bias in web-based surveys, including this survey [37].”
Flecha-Ortiz, J. A., Rivera-Guevarrez, R., Santos‐Corrada, M., & Fonseca, M. (2024) · Journal of Political Marketing · doi:10.1080/15377857.2024.2397964 · Cited by 5
“To mitigate self-selection bias, the strategies recommended by Bethlehem (2010) were applied, in which the study expanded the distribution of the survey using various social networks (SNSs) such as Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn, in addition to emails.”
Gityamwi, N., Armes, J., Harris, J., Ream, E., Green, R., Ahankari, A. S., Callwood, A., Ip, A., Cockle‐Hearne, J., Grosvenor, W., et al. (2025) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000806 · Cited by 6
“…creating a sample that is not representative as participants recruited online are subject to greater self-selection and may disproportionately comprise people from a particular socio-economic group, technology savvy or those who are health conscious or motivated to seek health solutions [163,164].”
Mergenthaler, M., Kemnade, M., Ollier-Höppe, C., & Schröter, I. (2025) · International journal on food system dynamics · doi:10.1163/18696945-bja00001 · Cited by 5
A deeper dive: A mixed methods approach to risk tolerance
Lurtz, M., Archuleta, K. L., Kothakota, M. G., & Jorgensen, T. (2021) · Financial Planning Review · doi:10.1002/cfp2.1112 · Cited by 5
“Selection bias is not uncommon in survey data (Bethlehem, 2010), but it does present issues for the interpretation of results.”
BackgroundA Survey of Treatment Trends for Acute Quadriceps Tendon Ruptures Among North American Surgeons
Matthies, N.-F., Paul, R., Dwyer, T., Chahal, J., & Whelan, D. B. (2022) · Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/23259671211045399 · Cited by 5
“Web surveys have a potential for high nonresponse rates, which can lead to estimation error.(1) Lack of response may have been due to a lack of desire to participate in an online survey, a lack of interest in the subject matter, or a simple lack of involvement in the care of orthopaedic trauma or acute QTR.”
BackgroundEXAMINING THE IMPACTS OF TRUST AND CREATIVITY ON INNOVATION FOCUSED PROMOTIVE VOICE
Sabol, M. A., & Winton, B. G. (2022) · International Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1142/s1363919622500244 · Cited by 5
Journalistien painostus ja uhkailu Suomessa: yleisyys ja vaikutukset
Hiltunen, I., Suuronen, A., & Pöyhtäri, R. (2022) · Media & viestintä · doi:10.23983/mv.120278 · Cited by 5
“Korkea itsevalintavinouman riski yhdistettynä matalaan vastausprosenttiin vähentää merkittävästi mahdollisuuksia tehdä näytteen perusteella luotettavia yleistyksiä kaikista suomalaisista journalisteista (ks. Bethlehem 2010; Sivo ym.”
BackgroundImplementing evidence into clinical practice. A survey amongst Norwegian acupuncturists
Dahle, M. L., & Alræk, T. (2023) · European Journal of Integrative Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.eujim.2023.102234 · Cited by 5
Nassar, R. I., Thiab, S. H., & Basheti, I. A. (2023) · Pharmacy Practice · doi:10.18549/pharmpract.2023.1.2791 · Cited by 4
Máté, Á., Rakovics, Z., Rudas, S., Wallis, L., Ságvári, B., Huszár, Á., & Koltai, J. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23094571 · Cited by 5
“The questionnaire included questions about the socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents, their attitudes towards various aspects of the digital world and their use of information and communication technology (ICT) devices.”
Cavanagh, N., Shrubsole, K., Alsop, T., & Williams, K. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2023.05.012 · Cited by 5
Cisel, M. (2023) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v24i4.7265 · Cited by 7
“Self-selection bias is inherent in online surveys (Bethlehem, 2010), but it did not impede comparisons within items or across age categories, as self-selection affected all groups equally.”
BackgroundZechner, O., Pretolesi, D., Jaespert, E., Guirao, D. G., & Tscheligi, M. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Metrology for eXtended Reality, Artificial Intelligence and Neural Engineering (MetroXRAINE) · doi:10.1109/metroxraine58569.2023.10405605 · Cited by 6
“1) Sources of Bias in Data Collection and Advanced Analytics: (a) Selection bias: Occurs when the collected data is not representative of the target population, leading to biased results [22].”
BackgroundMartins, L. (2024) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcae024 · Cited by 5
The impact of law on moral and social norms: evidence from facemask fines in the UK
Berneri, C., Larcom, S. T., Peng, C., & She, P.-W. (2024) · European Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1007/s10657-024-09800-4 · Cited by 7
Perceptions of unilluminated occupations a survey of Danish occupational therapists
Mønsted, N., Mahaffey, L., Jessen-Winge, C., & Larsen, A. E. (2024) · Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.1080/11038128.2024.2373080 · Cited by 5
“For this reason, we do not know the amount of people who received the survey, nor the characteristics of non-respondents, hence the potential nonresponse bias is unknown [24,37].”
The Role of Mega-events In Promoting Sustainable Behaviour: A Multi-group Analysis Using Micom
Alagarsamy, S., Mehrolia, S., & Ramdas, R. (2024) · International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration · doi:10.1080/15256480.2024.2390612 · Cited by 5
“By assigning different weights to different groups within the sample, based on their prevalence in the target population, statistical weighting corrects for discrepancies in sample composition, aligning it more closely with the population characteristics (Bethlehem, 2010; Eysenbach & Wyatt, 2002).”
The scholarly and practice profile of respiratory therapists in Canada: A cross-sectional survey
Zaccagnini, M., Bussières, A., Nugus, P., West, A. J., & Thomas, A. (2024) · Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy · doi:10.29390/001c.122345 · Cited by 5
Ford, M., Rothmann, S., & van Zyl, L. E. (2025) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-025-02922-7 · Cited by 5
“Secondly, self-selection bias might mean that the participants were already interested in aspects of personal development and well-being, and that this sample does not accurately represent all managers in South Africa [98].”
Cultural Influence on Global Assessment of Higher Education Service Quality
Sultan, P., & Wong, H. Y. (2013) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-3966-9.ch024 · Cited by 5
Web Panels for Official Statistics
Bethlehem, J. G., & Cobben, F. (2013) · Cited by 5
Self-citationSocioeconomic impact of migraine in Italy: Results of a national survey
Nica, M., Colombo, D., Ravasio, R., & Rognoni, C. (2020) · AboutOpen · doi:10.33393/abtpn.2020.2189 · Cited by 5
“As they were recruited via an online survey, this population may be biased towards the ability to use a computer or a mobile device with internet access (40).”
BackgroundCommon Pitfalls in using Online Platforms for Data collection in COVID times and its implications
Solanki, H. K., Parameswaran, G. G., & Rath, R. S. (2020) · Nepal Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.3126/nje.v10i4.31614 · Cited by 5
An evaluation of public initiatives to change behaviours that affect water quality
Grilli, G., & Curtis, J. A. (2022) · Environmental Policy and Governance · doi:10.1002/eet.1999 · Cited by 5
“The larger share of young respondents is common in web surveys, because older people are less likely to own a computer or an internet connection (Bethlehem, 2010) and in this instance be members of the survey company's online panel.”
BackgroundClinical and Research Perspectives on Visual Scene Displays
Thiessen, A., Thistle, J. J., & Brown, J. A. (2021) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2021_ajslp-20-00212 · Cited by 5
Ehwi, R. J., Maslova, S., & Asante, L. A. (2021) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2021.1945915 · Cited by 5
“while reaching out to people outside the researchers’ social networks (Bethlehem 2010).”
BackgroundCoyne, P., Staffell, Z., & Woodruff, S. J. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph182312664 · Cited by 5
“Lastly, given the recruitment protocols used, the study is subject to selection bias [27], further highlighting the need to careful interpretation of study results.”
MethodPeckover, S., Raineri, A., & Scanlan, A. T. (2021) · Event Management · doi:10.3727/152599521x16367300695870 · Cited by 5
Wittenberg, R., Read, S., Erens, B., Knapp, M. R. J., Wistow, G., Dickinson, F., Cyhlarova, E., & Mays, N. (2022) · Journal of Social Policy · doi:10.1017/s0047279421001045 · Cited by 5
Lee, G., & Park, S. H. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1025638 · Cited by 5
“This selection bias is crucial because people with limited access to the internet might not have been able to participate in the study (Bethlehem, 2010).”
BackgroundHolzmann‐Littig, C., Stadler, D., Popp, M., Kranke, P., Fichtner, F., Schmaderer, C., Renders, L., Braunisch, M. C., Assali, T., Platen, L., et al. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11111602 · Cited by 5
“Furthermore, selection bias is a known issue in online surveys [60] and cannot be ruled out.”
BackgroundArrington, T. L., & Darabi, A. (2017) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-017-9561-y · Cited by 5
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Attention-Grabbing Power of Branded vs. Unbranded Packaging
(2019) · Journal of Promotion Management · doi:10.1080/10496491.2019.1612489 · Cited by 5
“In addition, the sample members were selfselected volunteers found through social websites and as such may tend to have similarly strong opinions compared to the rest of the population (Jelke Bethlehem, 2010).”
BackgroundRetractedMellenbergh, G. J. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-12272-0_3 · Cited by 5
Giese, H., & König, L. M. (2022) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/ruza6 · Cited by 5
Examining the reliability and sources of validity evidence of the sexual cognitions checklist
Pérez‐Amorós, C., Sierra, J. C., Cervilla, Ó., & Sánchez-Fuentes, M. D. M. (2025) · International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.ijchp.2025.100605 · Cited by 4
“This sampling approach may lead to selection bias (Bethlehem, 2010), potentially overrepresenting individuals with specific interests or characteristics.”
Vergeer, J., van Weerdenburg, M., Schils, T., & Bakx, A. W. E. A. (2025) · Gifted Child Quarterly · doi:10.1177/00169862251351940 · Cited by 6
“Online questionnaires provide access to a large group of respondents but may result in biased estimates as participants self-select to participate (Bethlehem, 2010).”
The power of influencers: How moral image drives suboptimal food consumption
Guan, B., Li, X., Zeng, S., Liu, P., & Sun, H. (2025) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104462 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Bethlehem, J.
- Affiliations
- Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Bethlehem, Jelke
- Venue
- International Statistical Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-188
- ISSN
- 0306-7734 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-5823
- OpenAlex
- W2129332419
- Cited by
- 1,315
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 228 · 2025: 173 · 2024: 151 · 2023: 149 · 2022: 122 · 2021: 144 · 2020: 109 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 29.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Statistical Review (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Census and Population Estimation
- Keywords
- online surveys, selection bias, undercoverage, self-selection, internet access, survey design, participant recruitment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review