Cited by 130Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityDigital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Treatment and Access

Providing online support for young people with mental health difficulties: challenges and opportunities explored

Open access
Webb, Marianne, Burns, Jane, Collin, Philippa·2008·Early Intervention in Psychiatry

Abstract

Despite its growing popularity there is a paucity of information exploring the potential of the Internet to build a trusted community that helps reduce stigma, facilitates help-seeking and aids in the prevention or helps in the management of mental health difficulties for young people. Unsupervised online forums or chat rooms hold potential dangers for young people including the possibility of attracting adults who may take advantage of vulnerable adolescents. Contagion with members organizing suicide pacts, or describing suicidal or self-harming intentions and methods and young people ruminating about feeling depressed are also potential risks. This paper describes the development and conceptual underpinnings of the Reach Out! Online Community Forum, a moderated bulletin board, developed in consultation with, and facilitated by young people aged 16-25. The Forum, although facilitated by young people, is supported and monitored by trained moderators. Anecdotal evidence collected via unsolicited feedback from young people using the Forum suggests that it is a positive, unique and helpful online experience although little is known about the impact on stigma reduction and help seeking in the offline world. Given the proliferation of unsupervised forums and chat rooms there is a need for further research to determine the effectiveness or potential dangers of online forums in mental health prevention and early intervention work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1751-7893.2008.00066.x

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Young people use the internet as a major source of mental health information.

    “Young people report feeling more comfortable discussing sensitive and personal issues in the relative anonymity of an online context and use the internet as a major source of mental health information (14, 15).”

    From What Works and What Doesn’t Work? A Systematic Review of Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression and Anxiety in Young People (2019) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Introduction reports that 75% of surveyed Americans aged 15–24 accessed health information online, supporting substantial use by young people. It does not establish that the internet is a major source of mental-health information specifically for young people; its discussion of online mental-health information draws on broader populations. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Young people report feeling more comfortable discussing sensitive and personal issues in the relative anonymity of an online context.

    “Young people report feeling more comfortable discussing sensitive and personal issues in the relative anonymity of an online context and use the internet as a major source of mental health information (14, 15).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Nie NH. Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the Internet. Am Behav Sci 2001; 45: 420-35.
  2. Seligman MEP. Authentic Happiness: Using the New Positive Psychology to Realize Your Potential for Lasting Fulfillment. New York, NY: Free Press, Simon and Schuster, 2007.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Webb, M., Burns, J., & Collin, P.
Affiliations
  • Inspire Foundation (GB)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Webb, Marianne
Venue
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-04-21
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
108-113
ISSN
  • 1751-7885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7893
OpenAlex
W2011608379
Cited by
130
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
9.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Early Intervention in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Inspire Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
online mental health services, youth, mental health stigma, help-seeking, chat rooms, suicide prevention, self-harm, peer-led support, mental health prevention, early intervention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Humans, Self-Help Groups, Program Development, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review