Cited by 251Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityMental Health Treatment and AccessDigital Mental Health Interventions

Seeking Help From the Internet During Adolescence

GOULD, MADELYN S., MUNFAKH, JIMMIE LOU HARRIS, LUBELL, KERI, KLEINMAN, MARJORIE, PARKER, SARAH·2002·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective To assess the prevalence and demographic and psychological correlates of Internet use as a help-seeking resource for emotional problems in a community sample of adolescents.Method A self-report survey was completed by 9th-through 12th-grade students ( = 519) enrolled in health courses in six New York State high schools in the fall/winter of 1999. The relationship between Internet help-seeking behavior and demographic characteristics, hopelessness, functional impairment, and use of various treatment services was examined.Results Nearly one fifth (18.2%) of the adolescents sought help on the Internet for emotional problems in the previous year. The proportions of males and females seeking help on the Internet did not significantly differ (15.6% and 20.8%, respectively). Internet help-seekers were significantly more likely than non-help-seekers to score above the clinical threshold on the Columbia Impairment Scale (34% versus 20.6%; chi(2)(1) = 7.4, <.01) or Beck Depression Inventory (16.1% versus 9.1%; chi(2)(1) = 3.8, <.05). These at-risk youths tended to combine Internet help-seeking with other sources of help, rather than substituting it for other resources. More than 20% of Internet help-seekers were dissatisfied with the help they received, and only 14% thought it had helped them very much.Conclusions For the Internet to realize its potential as an effective resource for teenagers struggling with emotional problems, further development is needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004583-200210000-00007

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GOULD, M. S., MUNFAKH, J. L. H., LUBELL, K., KLEINMAN, M., & PARKER, S.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
GOULD, MADELYN S.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-10
Volume
41
Issue
10
Pages
1182-1189
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074146972
Cited by
250
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 18
FWCI
13.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
adolescents, emotional problems, depression, helplessness, functional disability, online mental health resources, help-seeking
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, New York, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Regression Analysis, Sex Factors, Multivariate Analysis, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review