Cited by 116Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychology and Mental HealthMental Health and Psychiatry

A descriptive review of qualitative studies in first episode psychosis

Boydell, Katherine M., Stasiulis, Elaine, Volpe, Tiziana, Gladstone, Brenda·2010·Early Intervention in Psychiatry

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this paper is to provide a descriptive review of published qualitative research studies on first episode psychosis (FEP). METHODS: A review was undertaken to describe the findings of qualitative studies in early psychosis. Keyword searches in Medline, CINAHL, ASSIA, PsychINFO databases, as well as manual searches of other relevant journals and reference lists of primary papers, were conducted. RESULTS: Thirty-one qualitative papers (representing 27 discrete studies) were identified. The majority reported research concerning young people based in community settings. The research studies were organized according to the following generic social processes: (i) achieving identity; (ii) acquiring perspectives; (iii) doing activity; and, (iv) experiencing relationships. The papers reviewed are based on first-person accounts obtained from individuals who have experienced FEP, their family members and service providers. CONCLUSION: This descriptive review contributes to our understanding of the complex social processes of achieving identity, acquiring perspectives, doing activities and developing relationships as experienced by young people and the significant others in their world. The cumulative findings highlight the contextually rich and detailed information made possible through qualitative studies of FEP. They begin to account for the active engagement of individuals affected by psychosis in making sense of their experience and suggest that this experience should be understood from within young people's own framework of meaning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1751-7893.2009.00154.x

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boydell, K. M., Stasiulis, E., Volpe, T., & Gladstone, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Boydell, Katherine M.
Venue
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-01-28
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
7-24
ISSN
  • 1751-7885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7893
OpenAlex
W2074279789
Cited by
116
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 9
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Early Intervention in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (68923)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
first-episode psychosis, early psychosis, youth, identity, interpersonal relationships, family perspectives, service providers, lived experience, meaning-making, community-based care
MeSH terms
Employment, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Mental Health Services, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Psychotic Disorders, Social Environment, Social Identification, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review