Cited by 32Gut microbiota and healthNitric Oxide and Endothelin EffectsAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

Sulfide- and nitrite-dependent nitric oxide production in the intestinal tract

Open access
Vermeiren, Joan, Van de Wiele, Tom, Van Nieuwenhuyse, Glynn, Boeckx, Pascal, Verstraete, Willy, Boon, Nico·2012·Microbial Biotechnology

Abstract

In the gut ecosystem, nitric oxide (NO) has been described to have damaging effects on the energy metabolism of colonocytes. Described mechanisms of NO production are microbial reduction of nitrate via nitrite to NO and conversion of l-arginine by NO synthase. The aim of this study was to investigate whether dietary compounds can stimulate the production of NO by representative cultures of the human intestinal microbiota and whether this correlates to other processes in the intestinal tract. We have found that the addition of a reduced sulfur compound, i.e. cysteine, contributed to NO formation. This increase was ascribed to higher sulfide concentrations generated from cysteine that in turn promoted the chemical conversion of nitrite to NO. The NO release from nitrite was of the order of 4‰ at most. Overall, it was shown that two independent biological processes contribute to the chemical formation of NO in the intestinal tract: (i) the production of sulfide by fermentation of sulfur containing amino acids or reduction of sulfate by sulfate reducing bacteria, and (ii) the reduction of nitrate to nitrite. Our results indicate that dietary thiol compounds in combination with nitrate may contribute to colonocytes damaging processes by promoting NO formation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2011.00320.x

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ignarro L.J. 2000 Academic Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vermeiren, J., Van de Wiele, T., Van Nieuwenhuyse, G., Boeckx, P., Verstraete, W., & Boon, N.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Boon, Nico
Venue
Microbial Biotechnology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-11-29
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
379-387
ISSN
1751-7915 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1547545431
Cited by
32
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Microbial Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Vlaamse regering
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
nitric oxide production, gut microbiota, sulfide, nitrite, cysteine, nitrate reduction, sulfate-reducing bacteria, colonic epithelial cells, sulfur-containing amino acids
MeSH terms
Adult, Bacteria, Humans, Intestinal Mucosa, Intestines, Male, Models, Biological, Nitric Oxide, Nitrites, Sulfides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review