Cited by 37Dental Health and Care UtilizationOral microbiology and periodontitis researchBehavioral Health and Interventions

An exploratory study into whether self‐monitoring improves adherence to daily flossing among dental patients

Suresh, Ruby, Jones, Katharine C., Newton, Jonathan Timothy, Asimakopoulou, Koula·2012·Journal of Public Health Dentistry

Abstract

Objectives: This exploratory study evaluated the effectiveness of an action‐control behavioral intervention on adherence to dental flossing in patients with periodontal disease. Action control, that is, monitoring one's behavior and evaluating it against a self‐set standard, has been suggested as a self‐regulatory strategy that can assist people who intend to engage in behavioral change. Methods: In a single‐center, single‐blind prospective trial, 73 dental patients received a behavioral intervention, which was either matched or mismatched to their stage of behavioral change. Through responses to a standardized self‐report measure, participants were classified either as motivational (i.e., not ready to change) or volitional (i.e., contemplating change) with regard to dental flossing. The intervention consisted of a simple self‐monitoring tool for dental flossing in the form of a diary. Flossing frequency, dental plaque, and bleeding scores were measured before and at 4 weeks postintervention. Results: Flossing frequency, dental plaque, and bleeding scores improved (P < 0.001) in both stage‐matched and stage‐mismatched patients. Conclusions: A brief behavioral intervention enhances adherence to dental flossing, regardless of participants' stage of change. Keeping a flossing diary can increase dental flossing and reduce plaque and bleeding scores in patients with periodontal disease, in the short term.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00274.x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suresh, R., Jones, K. C., Newton, J. T., & Asimakopoulou, K.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Asimakopoulou, Koula
Venue
Journal of Public Health Dentistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-09-12
Volume
72
Issue
1
Pages
1-7
ISSN
  • 0022-4006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-7325
OpenAlex
W2126329256
Cited by
37
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Public Health Dentistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
self-monitoring, dental flossing, periodontal disease, behavioral interventions, action control, self-regulation, stages of change, dental plaque, gingival bleeding
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior Therapy, Dental Devices, Home Care, Dental Plaque, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Patient Compliance, Periodontal Diseases, Prospective Studies, Self-Assessment, Single-Blind Method, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review