The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
HRM Practices and Organizational Commitment: Test of a Mediation Model
Abstract
This study was conducted to examine the mechanisms involved in observed relations between human resource management (HRM) practices and employee commitment. Employees (N = 281) from several organizations completed a survey that included measures of (a) the quality of HRM practices pertaining to performance appraisal, benefits, training, and career development used in their organizations, (b) procedural justice and organizational support, and (c) affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Structural equation modeling analyses revealed that relations between employees' evaluations of HRM practices and their affective and normative commitment were largely mediated by perceptions of organizational support and procedural justice. These findings support previous claims that, although HRM practices can be valuable tools in the establishment and maintenance of employee commitment, their effects are neither direct nor unconditional. Résumé: Cette étude avait pour but d'examiner certains mécan‐ismes intervenant dans le lien entre les pratiques de ges‐tion des ressources humaines et l'engagement des employés. Des employés (N=281) de plusieurs organisations ont rempli un questionnaire incluant des mesures de: (a) qualité des pratiques de gestion des ressources humaines en matière d'évaluation du rendement, de compensation, deformation et de développement profes‐sionnel, (b) justice en matiere de procedure et soutien organisationnel, et (c) engagement organisationnel affectif, continuation, et normatif. Des analyses basées sur la modélisation d'équations structurelles ont révélé que les liens entre l'évaluation par les employés des pratiques de gestion des ressources humaines et leur engagement affectif et normatif étaient en grande partie médiatisés par leur perception du soutien organisationnel et de justice en matière de procedure. Ces résultats corroborent le fait que malgré l'importance des pratiques de gestion des ressources humaines dans l'étab‐lissement et le maintien de l'engagement des employés, leurs effets ne sont ni directs ni inconditionnels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 19,023
Perceived organizational support.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 · Cited by 10,023
HUSELID, M. A. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256741 · Cited by 9,342
A Reliability Coefficient for Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis
Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291170 · Cited by 7,330
The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988) · Critical Issues in Social Justice · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2115-4 · Cited by 6,585
Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.108.2.171 · Cited by 6,449
Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements
Rousseau, D. (1995) · doi:10.4135/9781452231594 · Cited by 3,453
Moorman, R. H. (1991) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.76.6.845 · Cited by 3,422
What Should Be Done with Equity Theory?
Leventhal, G. S. (1980) · Social Exchange · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-3087-5_2 · Cited by 3,010
Cited by
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842 · Cited by 6,903
Self-citationCommonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research
Boselie, P., Dietz, G., & Boon, C. (2005) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2005.tb00154.x · Cited by 1,538
A Three-Component Model of Customer to Service Providers
Bansal, H. S., Irving, P. G., & Taylor, S. F. (2004) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070304263332 · Cited by 934
Alfes, K., Shantz, A. D., Truss, C., & Soane, E. C. (2013) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2012.679950 · Cited by 770
The Positive and Negative Effects of Switching Costs on Relational Outcomes
Jones, M. A., Reynolds, K. E., Mothersbaugh, D. L., & Beatty, S. E. (2007) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670507299382 · Cited by 446
Metadata
- Authors
- Meyer, J. P., & Smith, C. A.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 319-331
- ISSN
- 0825-0383 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-4490
- OpenAlex
- W2050475065
- Cited by
- 764
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 10.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HRM Practices and Organizational Commitment: Test of a Mediation Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1936-4490.2000.tb00231.x
- The paper
- Meyer, J. P., & Smith, C. A. (2000). HRM Practices and Organizational Commitment: Test of a Mediation Model. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.2000.tb00231.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.