CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 73

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structural characteristics of the Sudbury impact structure, Canada: Impact-induced versus orogenic deformation-A review

Riller, Ulrich·2005·Meteoritics & Planetary Science
DOI 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2005.tb00140.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract— Orogenic deformation, both preceding and following the impact event at Sudbury, strongly hinders a straightforward assessment of impact-induced geological processes that generated the Sudbury impact structure. Central to understanding these processes is the state of strain of the Sudbury Igneous Complex, the solidified impact melt sheet, its underlying target rocks, overlying impact breccias and post-impact sedimentary rocks. This review addresses (1) major structural, metamorphic and magmatic characteristics of the impact melt sheet and associated dikes, (2) attempts that have been made to constrain the primary geometry of the igneous complex, (3) modes of impact-induced deformation as well as (4) mechanisms of pre- and post-impact orogenic deformation. The latter have important consequences for estimating parameters such as magnitude of structural uplift, tilting of pre-impact (Huronian) strata and displacement on major discontinuities which, collectively, have not yet been considered in impact models. In this regard, a mechanism for the emplacement of Offset Dikes is suggested, that accounts for the geometry of the dikes and magmatic characteristics, as well as the occurrence of sulfides in the dikes. Moreover, re-interpretation of published paleomagnetic data suggests that orogenic folding of the solidified melt sheet commenced shortly after the impact. Uncertainties still exist as to whether the Sudbury impact structure was a peak-ring or a multi-ring basin and…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2005.tb00140.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 93

  1. Ariskin, 1999, Large meteorite impacts and planetary evolution II, 373
  2. Avermann, 1992, The Onaping Formation of the Sudbury Structure (Canada)-An example of allochthonous impact breccias, Tectonophysics, 216, 227, 10.1016/0040-1951(92)90169-7 · DOI
  3. Avermann, 1999, Large meteorite impacts and planetary evolution II, 323
  4. Bailey, 2004, Mazatzal-Labradorian age (1.7-1.6 Ga) ductile deformation of the South Range Sudbury impact structure at the Thayer Lindsley mine, Ontario, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 41, 1491, 10.1139/e04-098 · DOI
  5. Boerner, 2000, Seismic images and three-dimensional architecture of a Proterozoic shear zone in the Sudbury structure (Superior Province, Canada), Tectonics, 19, 397, 10.1029/1999TC900060 · DOI
  6. Borradaile, 1988, Magnetic susceptibility, petrofabrics, and strain, Tectonophysics, 156, 1, 10.1016/0040-1951(88)90279-X · DOI
  7. Brocoum, 1974, The Sudbury Basin, the Southern Province, the Grenville Front, and the Penokean Orogeny, Geological Society of America Bulletin, 85, 1571, 10.1130/0016-7606(1974)85<1571:TSBTSP>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  8. Butler, 1994, Large meteorite impacts and planetary evolution, 319
  9. Card, 1965, Geology of Hyman and Drury townships, 38
  10. Card K. D. 1978. Metamorphism of the middle Precambrian (Aphebian) rocks of the eastern Southern Province. Geological Survey of Canada, paper 78-10 pp. 269-282. · DOI
  11. Card, 1984, The geology and ore deposits of the Sudbury structure, 25
  12. Card, 1972, The Sudbury structure: Its regional geological setting, 67
  13. Card, 1976, Geology of the Dunlop-Shakespeare area, district of Sudbury, 52
  14. Clendenen, 1988, Strain studies of cleavage development in the Chelmsford Formation, Sudbury Basin, Ontario, Tectonophysics, 145, 191, 10.1016/0040-1951(88)90195-3 · DOI
  15. Cooke, 1948, Structural geology of canadian ore deposits, 580
  16. Cowan, 1999, Magnetic fabric constraints on the initial geometry of the Sudbury Igneous Complex: A folded sheet or a basinshaped igneous body, Tectonophysics, 307, 135, 10.1016/S0040-1951(99)00123-7 · DOI
  17. Cowan, 1999, Large meteorite impacts and planetary evolution II, 399
  18. Cowan, 1994, Proceedings of the Sudbury-Noril'sk Symposium, 45
  19. Deutsch, 1994, The Sudbury Structure-Constraints on its genesis from Lithoprobe results, Geophysical Research Letters, 21, 963, 10.1029/94GL00559 · DOI
  20. Deutsch, 1995, The Sudbury structure (Ontario, Canada): A tectonically deformed multi-ring impact basin, Geologische Rundschau, 84, 697, 10.1007/s005310050034 · DOI
  21. Dickin, 1999, Large meteorite impacts and planetary evolution II, 361
  22. Dressler, 1984, The Geology and ore deposits of the Sudbury structure, 57
  23. Dressler, 1984, The geology and ore deposits of the Sudbury structure, 97
  24. Dressler, 1991, Geology of Ontario, 593
  25. Fleet, 1987, Prograde metamorphism of the Sudbury Igneous Complex, Canadian Mineralogist, 25, 499
  26. Frarey M. J. , Loveridge W. D. , and Sullivan R. W. 1982. A U-Pb zircon age for the Creighton granite, Ontario. In Current research, Part C, Geological Survey of Canada pp. 129-132.
  27. Gibson, 1998, Shock-induced melting and vaporization of shatter cone surfaces: Evidence from the Sudbury impact structure, Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 33, 329, 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1998.tb01637.x · DOI · Paper page
  28. Grant, 1984, The geology and ore deposits of the Sudbury structure, 275
  29. Grieve, 2000, Vredefort, Sudbury, Chicxulub: Three of a kind, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 28, 305, 10.1146/annurev.earth.28.1.305 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Grieve, 1994, Proceedings of the Sudbury-Noril'sk Symposium, 119
  31. Grieve, 1991, The Sudbury structure-Controversial or misunderstood, Journal of Geophysical Research, 96, 22753, 10.1029/91JE02513 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Heaman, 1997, Global mafic magmatism at 2.45 Ga: Remnants of an ancient large igneous province, Geology, 25, 299, 10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025<0299:GMMAGR>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  33. Hirt, 1993, Correlation of strain and the anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility in the Onaping Formation-Evidence for a near-circular origin of the Sudbury Basin, Tectonophysics, 225, 231, 10.1016/0040-1951(93)90300-9 · DOI
  34. Ivanov, 1999, Large meteorite impacts and planetary evolution II, 389
  35. James, 1992, Thermobarometry of the Levack gneiss-footwall rocks to the Sudbury Igneous Complex (SIC), 179
  36. Kenkmann, 2000, Experimental generation of shock-induced pseudotachylites along lithological interfaces, Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 35, 1275, 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2000.tb01516.x · DOI
  37. Kenkmann, 2000, Radial transpression ridges: A new structural feature of complex impact craters, Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 35, 1189, 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2000.tb01508.x · DOI
  38. Krogh, 1984, The geology and ore deposits of the Sudbury structure, 431
  39. Krogh, 1996, Shock metamorphosed zircons with correlated U-Pb discordance and melt rocks with concordant protolith ages indicate an impact origin for the Sudbury structure, Geophysical Monograph, 85, 343
  40. Lakomy, 1990, Implications for cratering mechanics from a study of the Footwall breccia of the Sudbury impact structure, Canada, Meteoritics, 25, 195, 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1990.tb00997.x · DOI · Paper page
  41. Legault D. , Lafrance B. , and Ames D. E. 2003. Structural study of the Sudbury breccia and sulphide veins, Levack embayment, North Range of the Sudbury structure, Ontario. Current Research 2003-C1. Geological Survey of Canada pp. 1-9. · DOI
  42. Lieger D. 2005. Impaktgenetische Bedeutung von Pseudotachylitgängen der 1.85 Ga alten Sudbury-Impaktstruktur, Kanada. Unpublished Diploma thesis: Free University of Berlin, Germany. 99 p.
  43. Lightfoot, 2002, Geology, geochemistry, and mineralogy of the Worthington offset dike: A genetic model for offset dike mineralization in the Sudbury Igneous Complex, Economic Geology, 97, 1419, 10.2113/gsecongeo.97.7.1419 · DOI
  44. Lightfoot, 1997, Geochemical relationships in the Sudbury Igneous Complex: Origin of the Main Mass and Offset Dikes, Economic Geology, 92, 289, 10.2113/gsecongeo.92.3.289 · DOI
  45. Long, 2004, The tectonostratigraphic evolution of the Huronian basement and the subsequent basin fill: geological constraints on impact models of the Sudbury event, Precambrian Research, 129, 203, 10.1016/j.precamres.2003.10.003 · DOI
  46. McGrath, 1994, A gravity model for the Sudbury structure along the Lithoprobe seismic line, Geophysical Research Letters, 21, 955, 10.1029/93GL02247 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Melosh, 1989, Impact cratering: A geological process, 245
  48. Melosh, 1999, Impact crater collapse, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 27, 385, 10.1146/annurev.earth.27.1.385 · DOI
  49. Melosh, 2005, Impact tectonics, 55, 10.1007/3-540-27548-7_2 · DOI
  50. Milkereit, 1992, Deep geometry of the Sudbury structure from seismic reflection profiling, Geology, 20, 807, 10.1130/0091-7613(1992)020<0807:DGOTSS>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  51. Milkereit, 1994, Towards an improved seismic imaging technique for crustal structures-the Lithoprobe Sudbury experiment, Geophysical Research Letters, 21, 927, 10.1029/93GL02689 · DOI
  52. Morris, 1984, The geology and ore deposits of the Sudbury structure, 411
  53. Müller-Mohr, 1992, Breccias in the basement of a deeply eroded impact structure, Sudbury, Canada, Tectonophysics, 216, 219, 10.1016/0040-1951(92)90168-6 · DOI
  54. Mungall, 2004, Origins of outliers of the Huronian supergroup within the Sudbury structure, Journal of Geology, 112, 59, 10.1086/379692 · DOI
  55. Murphy, 2002, Geology, mineralization, and emplacement of the Whistle-Parkin offset dike, Sudbury, Economic Geology, 97, 1399, 10.2113/gsecongeo.97.7.1399 · DOI
  56. Ostermann M. 1996. Die Geochemie der Impaktschmelzdecke (Sudbury Igneous Comlex) im Multiring-Becken Sudbury. Inaugural Dissertation thesis: Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany. 118 p.
  57. Peredery, 1984, The geology and ore deposits of the Sudbury structure, 491
  58. Pope, 2004, Empirical and theoretical comparison of the Chicxulub and Sudbury impact structures, Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 39, 97, 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00052.x · DOI · Paper page
  59. PyeE. G., NaldrettA. J., and GiblinP. E., editors. 1984. The geology and ore deposits of the Sudbury structure. Special Publication 1. Toronto: Ontario Geological Survey. 603 p.
  60. Riller, 1996, Magnetic fabric and microstructural evidence for a tectono-thermal overprint of the early Proterozoic Murray pluton, central Ontario, Canada, Journal of Structural Geology, 18, 1005, 10.1016/0191-8141(96)00028-4 · DOI
  61. Riller, 1997, Mid-crustal deformation at the southern flank of the Sudbury Basin, central Ontario, Canada, Geological Society of America Bulletin, 109, 841, 10.1130/0016-7606(1997)109<0841:MCDATS>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  62. Riller, 1999, Transpressive tectonism in the eastern Penokean orogen, Canada: consequences for Proterozoic crustal kinematics and continental fragmentation, Precambrian Research, 93, 51, 10.1016/S0301-9268(98)00097-7 · DOI
  63. Riller, 1998, Low-temperature deformation mechanisms at a lithotectonic interface near the Sudbury Basin, eastern Penokean Orogen, Canada, Tectonophysics, 287, 59, 10.1016/S0040-1951(98)80061-9 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Roest, 1994, Restoring post-impact deformation at Sudbury-A circular argument, Geophysical Research Letters, 21, 959, 10.1029/93GL02044 · DOI
  65. Rousell, 1975, Origin of foliation and lineation in Onaping Formation and deformation of Sudbury Basin, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 12, 1379, 10.1139/e75-126 · DOI
  66. Rousell, 1984, The geology and ore deposits of the Sudbury structure, 211
  67. Rousell, 1984, The geology and ore deposits of the Sudbury structure, 83
  68. Rousell, 2003, Sudbury breccia (Canada): A product of the 1850 Ma Sudbury event and host to footwall Cu-Ni-PGE deposits, Earth Science Reviews, 60, 147, 10.1016/S0012-8252(02)00091-0 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Rousell, 1997, The tectonic, magmatic and mineralization history of the Sudbury structure, Exploration and Mining Geology, 6, 1
  70. Rousell, 1998, Are outliers of the Huronian Supergroup preserved in structures associated with the collapse of the Sudbury impact crater, Journal of Geology, 106, 407, 10.1086/516032 · DOI
  71. Rousell, 2002, The physical environment of the City of Greater Sudbury, 20
  72. Schwarz, 1973, Magnetic characteristics of massive sulfide ore bodies near Sudbury, Canada, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 10, 1735, 10.1139/e73-169 · DOI
  73. Scott, 2002, Emplacement of sulfide deposits in the Copper Cliff offset dike during collapse of the Sudbury crater rim: Evidence from magnetic fabric studies, Economic Geology, 97, 1447, 10.2113/gsecongeo.97.7.1447 · DOI
  74. Scott, 1999, Magnetic fabric constraints on friction melt flow regimes and ore emplacement direction within the South Range Breccia Belt, Sudbury impact structure, Tectonophysics, 307, 163, 10.1016/S0040-1951(99)00124-9 · DOI
  75. Scott, 2000, The South Range Breccia Belt of the Sudbury impact structure: A possible terrace collapse feature, Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 35, 505, 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2000.tb01432.x · DOI
  76. Shanks, 1991, Structural analysis of the central and southwestern Sudbury structure, Southern Province, Canadian Shield, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 28, 411, 10.1139/e91-037 · DOI · Paper page
  77. Shanks, 1991, Crude quantitative estimates of the original northwest-southeast dimension of the Sudbury structure, south-central Canadian Shield, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 28, 1677, 10.1139/e91-149 · DOI
  78. Siddorn, 2002, Variation in plagioclase clouding intensity in Matachewan dykes: Evidence for the exhumation history of the northern margin of the Sudbury Igneous Complex, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 39, 933, 10.1139/e02-003 · DOI
  79. Sims, 1989, Tectono-stratigraphic evolution of the Early Proterozoic Wisconsin magmatic terranes of the Penokean orogen, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 26, 2145, 10.1139/e89-180 · DOI
  80. Snyder, 2002, New insights into the structure of the Sudbury Igneous Complex from downhole seismic studies, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 39, 943, 10.1139/e02-013 · DOI
  81. Spray, 1997, Superfaults, Geology, 25, 579, 10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025<0579:S>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  82. Spray, 1998, Meteorites: Flux with time and impact effect, 171
  83. Spray, 1995, Friction melt distribution in a multiring impact basin, Nature, 373, 130, 10.1038/373130a0 · DOI · Paper page
  84. Stockwell, 1982, Proposals for the time classification and correlation of Precambrian rocks and events in Canada and adjacent areas of the Canadian Shield, Geological Survey Canada, 8019, 135
  85. Szabo E. 2002. A paleomagnetic study of the Sudbury breccia around the northern margin of the Sudbury Igneous Complex. Master of Science thesis. University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 120 p.
  86. Therriault, 2002, The Sudbury Igneous Complex: A differentiated impact melt sheet, Economic Geology, 97, 1521, 10.2113/gsecongeo.97.7.1521 · DOI · Paper page
  87. Thompson, 1994, Large meteorite impacts and planetary evolution, 275
  88. Thomson, 1985, Metamorphic assemblages in the South Range norite and footwall mafic rocks near the Kirkwood mine, Sudbury, Ontario, Canadian Mineralogist, 23, 173
  89. Tuchscherer, 2002, Geology, mineralization, and emplacement of the Foy Offset Dike, Sudbury impact structure, Economic Geology, 97, 1377
  90. Wichmann, 1993, Floor-fractured crater models of the Sudbury structure, Canada: Implications for initial crater size and crater modification, Meteoritics, 28, 222, 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1993.tb00760.x · DOI
  91. Wilson, 1956, Structure of lopoliths, Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 67, 289, 10.1130/0016-7606(1956)67[289:SOL]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  92. Wood, 1998, Origin and emplacement of Offset Dikes in the Sudbury impact structure: Constraints from the Hess, Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 33, 337, 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1998.tb01638.x · DOI · Paper page
  93. Wu, 1994, Timing constraints on deformation history of the Sudbury impact structure, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 31, 1654, 10.1139/e94-147 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Riller, U.
Venue
Meteoritics & Planetary Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-11
Volume
40
Issue
11
Pages
1723-1740
ISSN
  • 1086-9379
  • 1945-5100
DOI
10.1111/j.1945-5100.2005.tb00140.x
Cited by
73
References
2
Language
en
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 3591 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review