The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does it take one to know one? Endorsement of conspiracy theories is influenced by personal willingness to conspire
Open accessAbstract
We advance a new account of why people endorse conspiracy theories, arguing that individuals use the social-cognitive tool of projection when making social judgements about others. In two studies, we found that individuals were more likely to endorse conspiracy theories if they thought they would be willing, personally, to participate in the alleged conspiracies. Study 1 established an association between conspiracy beliefs and personal willingness to conspire, which fully mediated a relationship between Machiavellianism and conspiracy beliefs. In Study 2, participants primed with their own morality were less inclined than controls to endorse conspiracy theories - a finding fully mediated by personal willingness to conspire. These results suggest that some people think 'they conspired' because they think 'I would conspire'.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A common research finding is that belief in one conspiracy theory predicts belief in other, unrelated conspiracy theories.”
From Connecting the dots: illusory pattern perception predicts belief in conspiracies and the supernatural (2018) · cites this paper as Douglas & Sutton, 2011
In the citing paper
“endorsement of conspiracy theories is also associated with people's own willingness to engage in a conspiracy themselves when deemed necessary [46]”
From The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013) · cites this paper as [46]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
Book Review: The Psychology of Attitudes
Chakravarti, D., Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1997) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151869 · Cited by 7,173
Bem, D. J. (1972) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60024-6 · Cited by 5,241 · cited 1×
“According to self-perception theory (Bem, 1967, 1972), people infer their attitudes and dispositions by observing their own behaviour.”
Toward a Psychology of Human Agency
Bandura, A. (2006) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x · Cited by 3,459
Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena.
Bem, D. J. (1967) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0024835 · Cited by 2,959
Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-10497-7 · Cited by 2,943
Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis
Long, D. F., & Allison, G. T. (1972) · Journal of American History · doi:10.2307/1888485 · Cited by 1,754
Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception
Whitson, J. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1159845 · Cited by 1,119
Goertzel, T. (1994) · Political Psychology · doi:10.2307/3791630 · Cited by 1,094 · cited 6×
“DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02018.x studies point to the role of psychological traits such as anomie and a chronic lack of trust in others in the tendency to adopt conspiracy theories (Goertzel, 1994; Leman & Cinnirella, 2005; Swami, Chamorro-Premuzic, & Furnham, 2010).”
InfluentialMoral credentials and the expression of prejudice.
Monin, B., & Miller, D. T. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.33 · Cited by 1,086
Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis
Ikenberry, G. J., Allison, G. T., & ZELIKOW, P. D. (1999) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20049293 · Cited by 1,050
"Spontaneous" causal thinking.
Weiner, B. (1985) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.97.1.74 · Cited by 998
The Psychology of the Internet
Wallace, P. E. (1999) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511581670 · Cited by 863
Swami, V., Chamorro‐Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2010) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1583 · Cited by 499 · cited 2×
“…have been concerned with individual differences in conspiracy beliefs (e.g., Crocker et al., 1999; Goertzel, 1994; Leman & Cinnirella, 2005; Parsons et al., 1999; Swami et al., 2010; Whitson & Galinsky, 2008) and indeed there is a growing psychological ‘profile’ of the typical conspiracy theorist.”
Inside the Mind Reader's Tool Kit: Projection and Stereotyping in Mental State Inference.
Ames, D. R. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.340 · Cited by 447
McClosky, H. (1958) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1953011 · Cited by 397
Hodson, G., Hogg, S. M., & MacInnis, C. C. (2009) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.005 · Cited by 385
Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R., Broadnax, S., & Blaine, B. E. (1999) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672992511003 · Cited by 283
Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2008) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.3200/socp.148.2.210-222 · Cited by 247 · cited 2×
“After exposure to conspiracy theories about the death of Diana, Princess of Wales, British participants were more inclined to endorse those theories, but thought that their beliefs had not changed (Douglas & Sutton, 2008).”
Self-citationBeliefs in conspiracy theories and the need for cognitive closure
Leman, P. J., & Cinnirella, M. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00378 · Cited by 237
Conspiracy Nation: The Politics of Paranoia in Postwar America
Knight, P. (2002) · Cited by 176
McHoskey, J. W. (1995) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1703_7 · Cited by 158
J. Leman, P., & Cinnirella, M. (2007) · Social Psychological Review · doi:10.53841/bpsspr.2007.9.2.18 · Cited by 138
The popularity of conspiracy theories of presidential assassination: A Bayesian analysis.
McCauley, C., & Jacques, S. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.5.637 · Cited by 135 · cited 1×
“A conspiracy theory is defined as an attempt to explain the ultimate cause of a significant political or social event as a secret plot by a covert alliance of powerful individuals or organizations (e.g., McCauley & Jacques, 1979).”
A TEST OF THE GRAPEVINE: AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF CONSPIRACY THEORIES AMONG AFRICAN AMERICANS
Parsons, S. (1999) · Sociological Spectrum · doi:10.1080/027321799280235 · Cited by 112
(2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315259574 · Cited by 73
Conspiracy Nation: The Politics of Paranoia in Postwar America
Churchill, W., & Knight, P. (2003) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/3089853 · Cited by 60
The positive feedback bias as a response to self‐image threat
Harber, K. D., Stafford, R., & Kennedy, K. A. (2009) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466609x473956 · Cited by 53
A poor person's cognitive mapping.
Mason, F. (2002) · Cited by 28
Distributive judgments under uncertainty: Paccioli's game revisited.
Krueger, J. I. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.129.4.546 · Cited by 21
Distributive judgments under uncertainty: Paccioli's game revisited.
Krueger, J. I. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.129.4.546 · Cited by 16
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Eagly A. H., 1993, The psychology of attitudes
- Freud S., 1896, The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Volume III (1893–1899), 157
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding Conspiracy Theories
Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12568 · Cited by 1,511
Self-citationThe Effects of Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions
Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089177 · Cited by 1,232
“Conspiracy theories are attempts to explain events as the secret acts of powerful, malevolent forces [7], [8], [9], [10], [11].”
Self-citationMeasuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories: The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale
Brotherton, R., French, C. C., & Pickering, A. D. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279 · Cited by 950
The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science
Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Oberauer, K. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075637 · Cited by 693
Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12018 · Cited by 685
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Kent (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Douglas, Karen M.
- Venue
- British Journal of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-04-12
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 544-552
- ISSN
- 0144-6665 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8309
- OpenAlex
- W1928059346
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 19.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- British Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
- Keywords
- conspiracy theories, projection, Machiavellianism, social cognition, moral self
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Cooperative Behavior, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Machiavellianism, Male, Models, Theoretical, Power, Psychological, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
