Cited by 247Misinformation and Its ImpactsSocial and Intergroup PsychologyParanormal Experiences and Beliefs

The hidden impact of conspiracy theories: Perceived and actual influence of theories surrounding the death of Princess Diana

Douglas, Karen M., Sutton, Robbie M.·2008·The Journal of Social Psychology

Abstract

The authors examined the perceived and actual impact of exposure to conspiracy theories surrounding the death of Diana, Princess of Wales, in 1997. One group of undergraduate students rated their agreement and their classmates' perceived agreement with several statements about Diana's death. A second group of students from the same undergraduate population read material containing popular conspiracy theories about Diana's death before rating their own and others' agreement with the same statements and perceived retrospective attitudes (i.e., what they thought their own and others' attitudes were before reading the material). Results revealed that whereas participants in the second group accurately estimated others' attitude changes, they underestimated the extent to which their own attitudes were influenced.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3200/socp.148.2.210-222

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People are effectively persuaded by proconspiracy material but are not aware that they had been persuaded and falsely recalled that their preexposure beliefs were identical to their new beliefs.

    “Douglas and Sutton (2008) showed that people were effectively persuaded by proconspiracy material but were not aware that they had been persuaded and falsely recalled that their preexposure beliefs were identical to their new beliefs.”

    From The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories (2017) · cites this paper as Douglas and Sutton (2008)

  • People tend to be persuaded by conspiracy theories they are exposed to without being aware of it.

    “Further, recent findings suggest that people tend to be persuaded by conspiracy theories they are exposed to without being aware of it [20].”
  • Psychologists are learning more about the traits and characteristics associated with beliefs in conspiracy theories more generally, such as mistrust, anomie, political cynicism and Machiavellianism.

    “Psychologists are learning more about the traits and characteristics associated with beliefs in conspiracy theories more generally, such as mistrust, anomie, political cynicism and Machiavellianism [8], [20], [31], [50]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M.
Affiliations
University of Kent (GB)
Venue
The Journal of Social Psychology
Published
2008-04
Volume
148
Issue
2
Pages
210-222
ISSN
  • 0022-4545 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-1183
OpenAlex
W2047390304
Cited by
247
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
FWCI
11.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
Keywords
conspiracy theories, Princess Diana, perceived influence, attitude change, social influence
MeSH terms
Accidents, Traffic, Adolescent, Adult, Attitude to Death, England, Famous Persons, Female, Homicide, Humans, Deception, Male, Persuasive Communication, Psychological Theory, Public Opinion, Students, Wales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review