The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THEORY OF GENERALIZABILITY: A LIBERALIZATION OF RELIABILITY THEORY†
Abstract
“Reliability theory” is reinterpreted as a theory regarding the adequac with which one can generalize from one observation to a universe of observations. If the observation is randomly sampled from the universe—whether or not the universe consists of equivalent observations—the intraclass correlation provides an approximate lower bound to the expected value of the desired coefficient of generalizability.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“G-theory, a robust statistical methodology pioneered by Cronbach etal. (1963, 1972), offers a comprehensive analysis of the reliability and generalizability of assessment scores obtained from psychometric scales. It also identifies specific error sources potentially influencing measurements.”
From Investigating state and trait aspects of resilience using Generalizability theory (2024) · cites this paper as Cronbach et al., 1963
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 739
Spitzer, R. L. (1967) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1967.01730220091013 · Cited by 82
Construct validity and the predictability of behavior.
Jackson, D. N., & Paunonen, S. V. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0092818 · Cited by 79
A review of the literature on marking reliability
Billington, L., & Meadows, M. (2005) · Cited by 79
Development of the Motivational Interviewing Supervision and Training Scale.
Madson, M. B., Campbell, T. C., Barrett, D. E., Brondino, M. J., & Melchert, T. P. (2005) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/0893-164x.19.3.303 · Cited by 78
The reliability of clinicians' judgments: A multitrait-multimethod approach.
Goldberg, L. R., & Werts, C. E. (1966) · Journal of Consulting Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0023387 · Cited by 78
EXTENSION OF GENERALIZABILITY THEORY AND ITS APPLICATIONS IN EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT
Cardinet, J., Tourneur, Y., & Allal, L. K. (1981) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1981.tb00852.x · Cited by 77
Item Sampling for Achievement Testing
Osburn, H. G. (1968) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316446802800109 · Cited by 75
Vangeneugden, T., Laenen, A., Geys, H., Renard, D., & Molenberghs, G. (2004) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2003.08.009 · Cited by 75
“In psychometric theory, this is referred to as ‘‘generalizability theory’’ [27].”
BackgroundCoefficient Alpha and Beyond: Issues and Alternatives for Educational Research
Teo, T. P., & Fan, X. (2013) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-013-0075-z · Cited by 76
Counseling for indecisiveness: Problem-solving and anxiety-management training.
Mendonca, J. D., & Siess, T. F. (1976) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.23.4.339 · Cited by 75
Psychometric Characteristics of Assessment Procedures
Wasserman, J. D., & Bracken, B. A. (2003) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei1003 · Cited by 72
Data quality over data quantity in computational cognitive neuroscience
Kolossa, A., & Kopp, B. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.005 · Cited by 67
“Cronbach (1951) and his colleagues (Cronbach et al., 1963) explored Hoyt’s discovery systematically, and they developed a variant of the ‘classical’ true score model, i.”
The Signal/Noise Ratio in the Comparison of Reliability Coefficients
Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C. (1964) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316446402400303 · Cited by 68
Self-citationHagtvet, K. A., & Hanin, Y. L. (2006) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2005.12.002 · Cited by 67
“We followed the suggestion provided by Cronbach et al. (1972) to set these to zero when estimating dependability of the scores.”
MethodHa ha? Assessing individual differences in humor production ability.
Nusbaum, E. C., Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2016) · Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts · doi:10.1037/aca0000086 · Cited by 62
Matt, G. E. (2001) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b0-08-043076-7/00723-3 · Cited by 67
Rater effects in creativity assessment: A mixed methods investigation
Long, H., & Pang, W. (2014) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2014.10.004 · Cited by 65
“For these reasons, Cronbach (2004, p. 394) himself claimed, “Coefficients are a crude device that does not bring to the surface many subtleties implied by variance components” and he and his colleagues further developed generalizability (G) theory (Cronbach et al., 1963; Shavelson & Webb, 1991).”
BackgroundWijsen, L. D., Borsboom, D., & Alexandrova, A. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916211014183 · Cited by 79
Vervecken, D., Gygax, P. M., Gabriel, U., Guillod, M., & Hannover, B. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01437 · Cited by 83
“However, according to the theory of generalizability (Cronbach et al., 1963), Cronbach’s alpha can be viewed as a measure of how well the sum score on the selected items captures the expected score in the entire domain, even if that domain is heterogeneous.”
BackgroundTruong, Q. C., Krägeloh, C. U., Siegert, R. J., Landon, J., & Medvedev, O. N. (2020) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-020-01324-7 · Cited by 65
“G-Theory is able to evaluate specific sources of measurement error and generalizability of assessment scores to all possible circumstances using data obtained from a specific testing situation (Cronbach et al. 1963).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWhere does work stress come from? A generalizability analysis of stress in police officers
Lucas, T., Weidner, N., & Janisse, J. J. (2012) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2012.687738 · Cited by 83
Classroom Observation Schemes: Where are the Errors?
McGaw, B., Wardrop, J. L., & Bunda, M. A. (1972) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312009001013 · Cited by 63
Orlitzky, M., & Swanson, D. L. (2012) · Corporate Reputation Review · doi:10.1057/crr.2012.3 · Cited by 61
A Theory of Sex Differences in Technical Aptitude and Some Supporting Evidence
Schmidt, F. L. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691611419670 · Cited by 61
Neuroimaging of individual differences: A latent variable modeling perspective
Cooper, S. R., Jackson, J. J., Barch, D. M., & Braver, T. S. (2019) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.022 · Cited by 65
Situational judgement tests for selection: Traditional vs construct‐driven approaches
Tiffin, P. A., Paton, L. W., O'Mara, D. A., MacCann, C., Lang, J. W. B., & Lievens, F. (2019) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.14011 · Cited by 67
Thinking bigger: The Cronbachian paradigm & personality theory integration
Poropat, A. E., & Corr, P. J. (2014) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.006 · Cited by 61
Proxy‐report in individuals with intellectual disability: A scoping review
Santoro, S. L., Donelan, K., & Constantine, M. L. (2022) · Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities · doi:10.1111/jar.13013 · Cited by 59
State or trait? Measuring resilience by generalisability theory in breast cancer
Ye, Z. J., Zhang, Z., Zhang, X. Y., Tang, Y. C., Chen, P., Liang, M. Z., Sun, Z., & Yu, Y. L. (2020) · European Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101727 · Cited by 62
Harding, S. A., Britten, N., & Bristow, D. R. (2010) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03645.x · Cited by 57
Malhotra, M., & Sharma, S. (2008) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00207.x · Cited by 65
Investigating Reliabilities of Intraindividual Variability Indicators
Wang, L., & Grimm, K. J. (2012) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.715842 · Cited by 59
Research productivity in counseling psychology: An update and generalization study.
Howard, G. S. (1983) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.30.4.600 · Cited by 56
Zilcha‐Mano, S., Shimshoni, Y., Silverman, W. K., & Lebowitz, E. R. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2020.1756300 · Cited by 56
“According to the generalizability theory (Cronbach et al., 1963; Shavelson & Webb, 1991), taking into account the perspectives of distinct informants on a construct, who represent relevant source of variability, can be instrumental in building a more dependable assessment of the construct (Hoyt &…”
BackgroundMethodItem Response Theory for Peer Assessment
Uto, M., & Ueno, M. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2015.2476806 · Cited by 58
“In addition, the generalizability theory [49] has been used widely for analyzing the reliability of an assessment with multiple raters.”
MethodBuck, G. (1994) · Language Testing · doi:10.1177/026553229401100204 · Cited by 55
Intrinsic functional connectivity is organized as three interdependent gradients
Zhang, J., Abiose, O., Katsumi, Y., Touroutoglou, A., Dickerson, B. C., & Barrett, L. F. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-51793-7 · Cited by 47
Generalizabilidad de las observaciones de la acción del juego en el fútbol
Villaseñor, Á. B., Castellano, J., & Hernández-Mendo, A. (2000) · Psicothema · Cited by 54
Dependability of Measurement in Counseling Psychology
Hoyt, W. T., & Melby, J. N. (1999) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/0011000099273003 · Cited by 54
Domain Validity and Generalizability
Kaiser, H. F., & Michael, W. B. (1975) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447503500103 · Cited by 54
Using Big Data and Machine Learning in Personality Measurement: Opportunities and Challenges
Alexander, L., Mulfinger, E., & Oswald, F. L. (2020) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.2305 · Cited by 57
“…’ generalizability theory is an important ‐ yet ‐ underappreciated extension of the data box (Cronbach, Gleser, Nanda, & Rajaratnam, 1972; Cronbach, Rajaratnam, & Gleser, 1963) to estimate the variance along an in fi nite variety of dimensions (known as facets in generalizability theory),…”
BackgroundRaykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2006) · International Journal of Testing · doi:10.1207/s15327574ijt0601_5 · Cited by 52
Dennhag, I., Gibbons, M. B. C., Barber, J. P., Gallop, R., & Crits-Christoph, P. F. (2012) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2012.674790 · Cited by 51
“…and ICCs is that the generalizability theory makes it possible to assess multiple sources of measurement error simultaneously in order to characterize the variance components due to each source of measurement error (Cronbach et al., 1963; Shavelson & Webb, 1991; Webb, Shavelson, & Haertel, 2006).”
BackgroundFrom Cognitive-Domain Theory to Assessment Practice
Bennett, R. E., Deane, P., & van Rijn, P. W. (2016) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1141683 · Cited by 53
Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory
DeMars, C. E. (2018) · doi:10.1002/9781118489772.ch2 · Cited by 51
Bridgeford, E., Wang, S., Wang, Z., Xu, T., Craddock, R. C., Dey, J. K., Kiar, G., Gray-Roncal, W., Colantuoni, C., Douville, C. B., et al. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009279 · Cited by 48
“This idea is closely inspired by and related to ideas proposed by Cronbach’s “Theory of Generalizability” [29, 30].”
MethodDeKay, M. L., Rubinchik, N., Li, Z., & de Boeck, P. A. L. (2022) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916221079611 · Cited by 51
“The variables used to describe such differences are called facets (Baribault et al., 2018; Cronbach et al., 1963) to distinguish them from the elementary IVs.”
The relative importance of persons, items, subtests and languages to TOEFL test variance
Brown, J. D. (1999) · Language Testing · doi:10.1177/026553229901600205 · Cited by 50
Smith, A. K., Rhee, S. H., Corley, R. P., Friedman, N. P., Hewitt, J. K., & Robinson, J. L. (2012) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10519-012-9551-0 · Cited by 51
“Additionally, because raters are typically following a protocol and aiming for high interrater reliability, consistency between ratings may appear as a bias in ratings contributing to instrument variance (e.g., Cronbach et al. 1963).”
InfluentialDurvasula, S., Netemeyer, R. G., Andrews, J. C., & Lysonski, S. J. (2006) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400210 · Cited by 50
“…theory The basic premise behind generalizability theory (GT) is that ‘an investigator asks about the precision or reliability of a measure because he/she wishes to generalize from the observations in hand to some class of observations to which it belongs’ (Cronbach et al., 1963: 144).”
BackgroundMcEvoy, M. D., Smalley, J. C., Nietert, P. J., et al. (2012) · Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · doi:10.1097/sih.0b013e3182590b07 · Cited by 48
Tellegen, P. J., & Laros, J. A. (1993) · Cited by 48
Testing Reasoning and Reasoning About Testing
Haney, W. (1984) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543054004597 · Cited by 47
Evaluating the utility of workplace-based assessment tools for speciality training
Setna, Z., Jha, V., Boursicot, K., & Roberts, T. E. (2010) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2010.04.003 · Cited by 46
Responsiveness and initiative: Two aspects of social competence
Landry, S. H., Smith, K. E. L., Miller-Loncar, C. L., et al. (1997) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/s0163-6383(97)90027-8 · Cited by 47
Using automated analysis to assess middle school students' competence with scientific argumentation
Wilson, C. D., Haudek, K. C., Osborne, J. F., Bracey, Z. B., Cheuk, T., Donovan, B., Stuhlsatz, M. A. M., Santiago, M. M., & Zhaı, X. (2023) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21864 · Cited by 49
Applications of Generalizability Theory to Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology Research∗
Lakes, K. D., & Hoyt, W. T. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374410802575461 · Cited by 46
Brennan, R. L. (2010) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-044894-7.00246-3 · Cited by 46
Bi, J., & Kuesten, C. L. (2012) · Journal of Sensory Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1745-459x.2012.00399.x · Cited by 46
Issues of Reliability in Measuring Intimate Partner Violence during Courtship
Ryan, K. M. (2012) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0233-4 · Cited by 45
“Cronbach’s α is a part of a larger psychometric theory, Generalizability Theory (Cronbach and Shavelson 2004; Cronbach et al. 1963).”
MethodVillaseñor, Á. B., Castellano, J., Hernández-Mendo, A., et al. (2014) · Revista de psicología del deporte · Cited by 45
Townsend, S., & Medvedev, O. N. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77644-2_91-1 · Cited by 65
Emshoff, J. G., Blakely, C. H., Gottschalk, R. G., Mayer, J., Davidson, W. S., & Erickson, S. K. (1987) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/01623737009004300 · Cited by 46
Generalizability of Stabilogram Diffusion Analysis of center of pressure measures
Doyle, R. J., Ragan, B. G., Rajendran, K., et al. (2007) · Gait & Posture · doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.03.013 · Cited by 45
A double-structure structural equation model for three-mode data.
González, J., de Boeck, P. A. L., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2008) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0013269 · Cited by 43
Unanticipated Difficult Airway in Obstetric Patients
Balki, M., Cooke, M. E., Dunington, S., et al. (2012) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e31826903bd · Cited by 44
Developing and Gathering Psychometric Evidence for a Fidelity Instrument
Snyder, P., Hemmeter, M. L., Fox, L., Bishop, C. C., & Miller, M. D. (2013) · Journal of Early Intervention · doi:10.1177/1053815113516794 · Cited by 44
Generalizability of automated scores of writing quality in Grades 3–5.
Wilson, J., Chen, D., Sandbank, M. P., & Hebert, M. A. (2018) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000311 · Cited by 44
Sampling Errors of Variance Components in Small Sample Multifacet Generalizability Studies
Smith, P. L. (1978) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986003004319 · Cited by 56
Barch, D. M., & Mathalon, D. H. (2011) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.01.004 · Cited by 41
Everything that you have ever been told about assessment center ratings is confounded.
Jackson, D. J. R., Michaelides, G., Dewberry, C., et al. (2016) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000102 · Cited by 42
A multi‐country assessment of the long‐term orientation scale
Hassan, L. M., Shiu, E., & Walsh, G. (2011) · International Marketing Review · doi:10.1108/02651331111107116 · Cited by 41
Cognitive processes and individual differences in judgments relevant to drunk driving.
Jaccard, J. J., & Turrisi, R. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.135 · Cited by 41
PROGRESS IN PSYCHOMETRICS: CAN INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY CATCH UP?
Murphy, K. R., & SHON, R. D. (2000) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb02423.x · Cited by 39
Li, M., Shavelson, R. J., Yin, Y., & Wiley, E. (2015) · The Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/9781118625392.wbecp352 · Cited by 43
Characteristics of Serve, Reception and Set That Determine the Setting Efficacy in Men’s Volleyball
Gónzález-Silva, J., Fernández‐Echeverría, C., Conejero, M., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00222 · Cited by 40
The psychometric upgrade psychophysiology needs
Clayson, P. E. (2024) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.14522 · Cited by 44
Measurement of opioid problems among chronic pain patients in a general medical population
Banta‐Green, C. J., Merrill, J. O., Doyle, S. R., Boudreau, D. M., & Calsyn, D. A. (2009) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.03.022 · Cited by 40
Wedell, D. H., Parducci, A., & Lane, M. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.58.2.319 · Cited by 47
“Within the framework of generalizability theory (Cronbach et al., 1963), the pertinent universe of generalization is one that includes different judges and different contexts.”
BackgroundCommunity pharmacy: A method of assessing quality of care
Smith, F. J., Salkind, M. R., & Jolly, B. C. (1990) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(90)90096-b · Cited by 40
Potential performance theory (PPT): A general theory of task performance applied to morality.
Trafimow, D., & Rice, S. C. (2008) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.115.2.447 · Cited by 40
A Psychometric Review of Norm-Referenced Tests Used to Assess Phonological Error Patterns
Kirk, C. J., & Vigeland, L. M. (2014) · Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools · doi:10.1044/2014_lshss-13-0053 · Cited by 39
Doty, D. H., Bhattacharya, M., Wheatley, K., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2005) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.04.005 · Cited by 40
Robitzsch, A., Lüdtke, O., Goldhammer, F., Kroehne, U., & Köller, O. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00884 · Cited by 38
“Thus, it could be argued that the choice of items – in addition to the selection of students – represents an additional source of uncertainty that should be taken into account in the statistical quantification of the error of trend estimates (Cronbach et al., 1963; Husek and Sirotnik, 1967; Brennan, 1992; Michaelides…”
BackgroundReliability of Two Instruments for Critical Assessment of Economic Evaluations
Au, F., Prahardhi, S., & Shiell, A. (2007) · Value in Health · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00255.x · Cited by 39
Perceived influences on implementing data warehousing
Little, R., & Gibson, M. L. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2003.1191794 · Cited by 39
Modeling and Measuring Educational Treatment in Evaluation
Leinhardt, G. (1980) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543050003393 · Cited by 39
“Some statistical procedures for estimating reliability are: simple percent agreement, Scott's (1955) coefficient, a correlation coefficient, or variations of intraclass correlations, such as those proposed by Ebel (1951) or Cronbach et al.”
MethodPrime, H., Browne, D. T., Akbari, E. M., Wade, M., Madigan, S. L., & Jenkins, J. M. (2014) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12322 · Cited by 38
Prime, H., Plamondon, A., Pauker, S., Perlman, M., & Jenkins, J. M. (2016) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2016.03.005 · Cited by 38
Chapter 11 : Persistent Methodological Questions in Educational Testing
Hattie, J., Jaeger, R. M., & Bond, L. (1999) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.2307/1167275 · Cited by 45
Some Hypotheses Concerning test Adequacy
Fiske, D. W. (1966) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316446602600107 · Cited by 38
The physical symptoms inventory: Measuring levels of somatic complaining behavior
Wahler, H. J. (1968) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/1097-4679(196804)24:2 · Cited by 69
Vispoel, W. P., Morris, C. A., & Kilinc, M. (2017) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2017.1296455 · Cited by 38
“G-coefficients for particular universes are conceptualized as reliability indexes for randomly parallel measures as indexed by estimates of the average reliability of scores within those universes (Brennan, 2001; Cronbach et al., 1963).”
BackgroundMethodRobitzsch, A., & Lüdtke, O. (2022) · Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences · doi:10.1186/s42409-022-00039-w · Cited by 36
“Interestingly, it has been argued that classical test theory (CTT) or generalizability theory (GT; Cronbach et al., 1963) treats items in a study as random and, as a consequence, allows the inference to a larger set of items in a population of items (see also Nunnally & Bernstein, 1994; Markus &…”
BackgroundPrime, H., Perlman, M., Tackett, J. L., & Jenkins, J. M. (2014) · Early Education and Development · doi:10.1080/10409289.2013.821313 · Cited by 37
Reliability in Experimental Sociology
Thye, S. R. (2000) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/78.4.1277 · Cited by 49
Keep it real: rethinking the primacy of experimental control in cognitive neurosciencePreprint
Nastase, S. A., Goldstein, A., & Hasson, U. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/whn6d · Cited by 37
Replication Studies in Nonprofit Research
Helmig, B., Spraul, K. S., & Tremp, K. (2011) · Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0899764011404081 · Cited by 35
Development of a Synchronization Coefficient for Biosocial Interactions in Groups and Teams
Guastello, S. J., & Peressini, A. F. (2016) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496416675225 · Cited by 35
“The SE coefficient presented here was not derived directly from Cronbach et al. (1963) or Kenny (1994), who were not studying synchronization, but rather extended from the more classical multiple linear regression theory.”
MethodLp Loss Functions in Invariance Alignment and Haberman Linking with Few or Many Groups
Robitzsch, A. (2020) · Stats · doi:10.3390/stats3030019 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Cronbach, L. J., Rajaratnam, N., & Gleser, G. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rajaratnam, Nageswari
- Venue
- British Journal of Statistical Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1963-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 137-163
- ISSN
- 0950-561X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023420063
- Cited by
- 737
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 40.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Statistical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Keywords
- generalizability theory, reliability theory, intraclass correlation coefficient, random sampling, lower bounds, measurement reliability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review