The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THEORY OF GENERALIZABILITY: A LIBERALIZATION OF RELIABILITY THEORY†
Abstract
“Reliability theory” is reinterpreted as a theory regarding the adequac with which one can generalize from one observation to a universe of observations. If the observation is randomly sampled from the universe—whether or not the universe consists of equivalent observations—the intraclass correlation provides an approximate lower bound to the expected value of the desired coefficient of generalizability.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“G-theory, a robust statistical methodology pioneered by Cronbach etal. (1963, 1972), offers a comprehensive analysis of the reliability and generalizability of assessment scores obtained from psychometric scales. It also identifies specific error sources potentially influencing measurements.”
From Investigating state and trait aspects of resilience using Generalizability theory (2024) · cites this paper as Cronbach et al., 1963
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 739
Sources of variance in end-of-course student evaluations
Curby, T. W., McKnight, P. E., Alexander, L. A., et al. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1607249 · Cited by 18
Moosbrugger, H. (2011) · Springer-Lehrbuch · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20072-4_5 · Cited by 18
THE GENERALIZABILITY OF STUDENT RATINGS OF COURSES: ASKING THE RIGHT QUESTIONS
SMITH, P. L. (1979) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1979.tb00089.x · Cited by 18
Evaluating Fairness of Automated Scoring in Educational Measurement
Johnson, M., & McCaffrey, D. F. (2023) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003278658-12 · Cited by 18
How to Support Prescriptive Statements by Empirical Research: Some Missing Parts
Wecker, C. (2012) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9208-9 · Cited by 17
Mannheimer, B., Andersson, B., Carlsson, L., & Währborg, P. (2007) · Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal · doi:10.1080/14017430701422454 · Cited by 17
Generalizability coefficients are reliability coefficients
O’Brien, R. M. (1995) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/bf01106066 · Cited by 17
Jiang, Z., Raymond, M. R., Shi, D., et al. (2020) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-020-01399-z · Cited by 17
Bottema‐Beutel, K., Lloyd, B. P., Carter, E. W., et al. (2014) · American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1352/1944-7558-119.6.589 · Cited by 17
An Exploratory Study of the Generalizability of Selected Marketing Measures
Rentz, J. O. (1988) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/009207038801600319 · Cited by 17
Zhang, J., Chen, D., Deming, P., Srirangarajan, T., Theriault, J. E., Kragel, P. A., Hartley, L., Lee, K. M., McVeigh, K., Wager, T. D., et al. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.07.20.548178 · Cited by 17
Test-Retest Reliability and Construct Validity of the Brief Dark Triad Measurements
Dragostinov, Y., & Mõttus, R. (2022) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2022.2052303 · Cited by 15
“However, many authors have highlighted its limitations, including Cronbach himself (Cronbach et al., 1963; Cronbach & Shavelson, 2004; Murphy & Davidshofer, 2001; Sijtsma, 2009), primarily because the assumption that all scale items measure exactly the same trait is untenable.”
BackgroundHollo, A., Staubitz, J. L., & Chow, J. C. (2020) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2020_jslhr-19-00118 · Cited by 16
Weigl, K., Schartmüller, C., Wintersberger, P., Steinhauser, M., & Riener, A. (2021) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2021.106408 · Cited by 16
Viscosity and social cohesion in temporal lobe epilepsy.
Rao, S. M., Devinsky, O., Grafman, J. H., et al. (1992) · Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.55.2.149 · Cited by 16
Reliable assessment of operative performance
Bilgiç, E., Watanabe, Y., McKendy, K. M., et al. (2015) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.10.008 · Cited by 16
Homogeneity Indices and Test Length
Tyler, T. A., & Fiske, D. W. (1968) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316446802800306 · Cited by 16
Identifying Writing Strategies Through Text Analysis
van Wijk, C., & Sanders, T. J. M. (1999) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088399016001003 · Cited by 16
Developing Criterion-Referenced Tests.
Jackson, R. (1970) · Cited by 16
Villaseñor, Á. B., Riba, S. S. I., & Escolano-Pérez, E. (2010) · PubMed · Cited by 16
Ordinal generalizability theory using an underlying latent variable framework
Ark, T. K. (2015) · cIRcle (University of British Columbia) · doi:10.14288/1.0166304 · Cited by 16
Chalmers, R. A., Pratscher, S. D., Bettencourt, B. A., & Medvedev, O. N. (2020) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-020-01520-5 · Cited by 16
Extending Applications of Generalizability Theory-Based Bifactor Model Designs
Vispoel, W. P., Lee, H., Chen, T., & Hong, H. (2023) · Psych · doi:10.3390/psych5020036 · Cited by 15
“Applications of GT are based on three primary assumptions: (a) the universe(s) of generalization is/are clearly defined, (b) facet conditions are experimentally independent, and (c) scores are expressed on equal interval metrics [1] (p.”
BackgroundInfluentialVispoel, W. P., Lee, H., & Hong, H. (2023) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2023.2222913 · Cited by 15
“Generalizability theory (GT; Brennan, 2001a; Cronbach et al., 1963; Cronbach et al., 1972; Shavelson & Webb, 1991) provides a powerful framework for understanding how scores from assessment measures are affected by multiple sources of measurement error.”
BackgroundData Quality Control of an Observational Tool to Analyze Football Semiotricity
Marqués-Jiménez, D., & Martínez-Santos, R. (2015) · Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte · doi:10.4321/s1578-84232015000100021 · Cited by 15
Generalisability in unbalanced, uncrossed and fully nested studies
Narayanan, A., Greco, M. J., & Campbell, J. L. (2010) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03606.x · Cited by 15
The implications of unconfounding multisource performance ratings.
Jackson, D. J. R., Michaelides, G., Dewberry, C., Schwencke, B., & Toms, S. (2019) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000434 · Cited by 16
“The second reliability-related consideration that has yet to be fully investigated in the multisource performance literature concerns intentions to “generalize” across different sources of error (see Cronbach et al., 1963).”
BackgroundProbabilistic Foundations for Coefficients of Generalizability
Hunter, J. E. (1968) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289672 · Cited by 15
6: Measurement Techniques In Evaluation
Sjogren, D. D. (1970) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543040002301 · Cited by 16
“Osburn (1968) discussed the generalizability theory of Cronbach et al. (1963) and concluded that for the theory to hold it would be necessary to develop item generating rules.”
BackgroundThe Estimation of Mean Achievement Scores for Schools by the Item-Sampling Technique
Cahen, L. S., Romberg, T. A., & Zwirner, W. W. (1970) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447003000104 · Cited by 15
Intraclass Correlation as an Approximation to the Coefficient of Generalizability
Cronbach, L. J., Ikeda, H., & Avner, R. A. (1964) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1964.15.3.727 · Cited by 15
Self-citationConceptualising and interpreting reliability
Johnson, S., & Johnson, R. (2010) · Digital Education Resource Archive (University College London) · Cited by 15
Khodi, A. (2021) · Language Testing in Asia · doi:10.1186/s40468-021-00134-5 · Cited by 14
“For the first time, G-theory was introduced by Cronbach et al. (1963, b) to the field of education and psychology. Briesch et al. (2014) stated that G-theory estimates the proportion of multiple sources of variances within the framework of ANOVA, and in line with this definition, Bachman (1990) asserted that “It const…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA Randomized Controlled Trial for Audiovisual Multisensory Perception in Autistic Youth
Feldman, J. I., Dunham, K., DiCarlo, G. E., Cassidy, M. M., Liu, Y., Suzman, E., Williams, Z. J., Pulliam, G., Kaiser, S., Wallace, M. T., et al. (2022) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-022-05709-6 · Cited by 18
The Geometry of Probability, Statistics, and Test Theory
Zimmerman, D. W., & Zumbo, B. D. (2001) · International Journal of Testing · doi:10.1080/15305058.2001.9669476 · Cited by 14
Operationalism and realism in psychometrics
Vessonen, E. (2019) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12624 · Cited by 14
Alkharusi, H. (2011) · Journal of Studies in Education · doi:10.5296/jse.v2i1.1227 · Cited by 14
A Family of Measures to Evaluate Scale Reliability in a Longitudinal Setting
Laenen, A., Alonso, A., Molenberghs, G., & Vangeneugden, T. (2008) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2008.00554.x · Cited by 14
“…the most important attempt to extend the concept of reliability to a longitudinal scenario came from generalizability theory (G-theory), which was developed to model explicitly the multiple sources of variation that are present in a measurement system (Cronbach et al., 1963, 1972; Brennan, 2001).”
BackgroundSaint‐Mont, U. (2012) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959354311429997 · Cited by 14
“Yet this attitude has been much criticized, in particular by Duncan (1984), to whom we owe the title of this section (see his chap.”
BackgroundOpen Peer Commentary and Author'S Response
Asendorpf, J. B., Balliet, D. P., Righetti, F., Blackie, L. E. R., Jayawickreme, E., Blum, G. S., Schmitt, M., Donnellan, M. B., Corker, K. S., Dunlop, W. L., et al. (2018) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.2174 · Cited by 15
Smith, K. E., Keeney, S. E., Zhang, L., Perez-Polo, J. R., & Rassin, D. K. (2007) · International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2007.09.006 · Cited by 14
TRAIT‐TREATMENT INTERACTIONS AND LEARNING1
Berliner, D. C., & Cahen, L. S. (1972) · ETS Research Bulletin Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.1972.tb00448.x · Cited by 14
Measuring the quality of hospital doctors through colleague and patient feedback
Narayanan, A., Greco, M. J., Powell, H., et al. (2011) · Journal of Management & Marketing in Healthcare · doi:10.1179/1753304x11y.0000000006 · Cited by 13
López-Caudana, E. O., Ponce, P., Mazón, N., & Reyes, G. E. B. (2022) · International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) · doi:10.1007/s12008-022-00851-y · Cited by 13
“The measure of reliability using Cronbach [40] assumes that the items (measured on a Likert scale) measure the same construct and are highly correlated [41].”
MethodFarrell, R. M., Gilbert, G. E., Betance, L., Huck, J., Hunt, J., Dundas, J. M., & Pope, E. R. (2022) · Veterinary Surgery · doi:10.1111/vsu.13791 · Cited by 16
Sousa, V. D., Ryan‐Wenger, N. A., Driessnack, M., & Jaber, A. F. (2010) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01276.x · Cited by 13
“This approach is widely accepted when developing and evaluating psychometric properties of new research instruments or scales [37,38].”
BackgroundMethodEpisodic organization in discourse and valid measurement in the sciences*
Oller, J. W., & Chen, L. (2007) · Journal of Quantitative Linguistics · doi:10.1080/09296170701379336 · Cited by 13
“Logically, a general theory of signs thus provides hope for the unified validity sought by Messick (1993, 1998) and alluded to, in principle, by Stevens (1968), also in generalizability theory (Cronbach et al., 1963; Shavelson et al., 1989).”
BackgroundFundamentals of Measurement and Assessment in Psychology
Reynolds, C. R. (1998) · Comprehensive Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1016/b0080-4270(73)00002-x · Cited by 13
Correlated Effects in Generalizability Studies
Smith, P. L., & Luecht, R. M. (1992) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662169201600302 · Cited by 12
Integration of Concepts of Reliability and Standard Error of Measurement
Horn, J. L. (1971) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447103100104 · Cited by 13
Obtaining Generalizability Coefficients for Clinical Evaluations
Boodoo, G. M., & O’Sullivan, P. (1982) · Evaluation & the Health Professions · doi:10.1177/016327878200500308 · Cited by 13
Congeneric Modeling of Reliability Using Censored Variables
Brown, R. (1989) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662168901300205 · Cited by 12
The Role of Assessment in Clinical Psychology
SECHREST, L. B., Stickle, T. R., & Stewart, M. (1998) · Comprehensive Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1016/b0080-4270(73)00013-4 · Cited by 13
An Analysis of Variance Framework for Matrix Sampling
Sirotnik, K. (1970) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447003000410 · Cited by 14
Vispoel, W. P., Lee, H., Xu, G., & Hong, H. (2022) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2022.2092833 · Cited by 12
“…explicit assumptions of score dimensionality and typically rendering reliability indices reflecting random rather than classical parallelism (see, e.g., Brennan, 2010; Cronbach et al., 1963, 1972; Vispoel, Lee, et al., in press; Vispoel et al., 2018a, 2018b, 2019; Vispoel, Xu, & Schneider, 2021).”
BackgroundGonçalves, F., & Gaudêncio, M. (2023) · BMC Palliative Care · doi:10.1186/s12904-023-01273-7 · Cited by 18
“Before determining Cronbach’s alpha indexes [29], the descriptive statistics of each item observed at each scale were determined, namely the mean and the standard deviation.”
MethodVispoel, W. P., Lee, H., Chen, T., & Hong, H. (2023) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2023.2268193 · Cited by 15
“This follows from GT requiring no explicit assumptions about the content of the universe or statistical properties of scores (Cronbach et al., 1963, p. 145).”
BackgroundMethodTruong, Q. C., Nguyen, T. M., An, N. H., Medvedeva, A., & Medvedev, O. N. (2022) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-022-01950-3 · Cited by 13
“G-Theory is an extension of CTT and can evaluate possible sources of measurement error that may influence the reliability of an instrument (Allen & Yen, 1979; Cronbach et al., 1963).”
BackgroundMethodMaerten‐Rivera, J., Huggins‐Manley, A. C., Adamson, K., Lee, O., & Llosa, L. (2015) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21198 · Cited by 12
Truong, Q. C., Choo, C. C., Numbers, K. T., Merkin, A., Brodaty, H., Kochan, N. A., Sachdev, P. S., Feigin, V. L., & Medvedev, O. N. (2021) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s1041610221000363 · Cited by 16
“…measurement consists of true variance and error variance presented as a single factor, G-theory utilizes ANOVA to estimate all possible sources of error variance that may affect the main outcome variable as well as the accuracy of the measurement itself (Allen and Yen, 2001; Cronbach et al., 1963).”
MethodA Monte Carlo Study of Confidence Interval Methods for Generalizability Coefficient
Jiang, Z., Raymond, M. R., DiStefano, C., Shi, D., Liu, R., & Sun, J. (2021) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/00131644211033899 · Cited by 12
“Generalizability theory (G-theory) provides a conceptual framework and statistical procedures for evaluating the reliability of behavioral measurements such as test scores, performance evaluations, and survey ratings (Cronbach et al., 1963).”
BackgroundLaenen, A., Alonso, A., Molenberghs, G., Vangeneugden, T., & Mallinckrodt, C. H. (2008) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.09.010 · Cited by 12
“…of the most important attempts to extend reliability theory to more general settings came with the development of Generalizability theory (G-theory; Cronbach et al 1963, 1972), which is based on analysis-of-variance models with random effects, and was developed to model the multiple sources of…”
Open Peer Commentary and Author'S Response
Heimann, A. L., & Ingold, P. V. (2017) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.2119 · Cited by 12
A Note on Design of Test Experiments
Osburn, H. G. (1967) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316446702700402 · Cited by 12
ITEMS AND PERSONS: FORMAL DUALS AND PSYCHOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES
Fiske, D. W. (1968) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0304_2 · Cited by 12
Estimating the magnitude of anxiety from speech
Gottschalk, L. A., & Frank, E. C. (1967) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/bs.3830120403 · Cited by 12
Ambrosie, F., & Heller, R. W. (1972) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.1972.11011344 · Cited by 12
LaForge, R. (1965) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289448 · Cited by 12
ten Hove, D., Jorgensen, T. D., & van der Ark, L. A. (2025) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2025.2507745 · Cited by 16
“As mentioned before, ICCs are closely related to generalizability theory (Brennan, 2001; Cronbach et al., 1963) which distinguishes Generalizability studies and Decision studies.”
InfluentialExperimentelle Schmerizinduktion im algesimetrischen Humanversuch
Göbel, H., & Westphal, W. (1989) · Der Schmerz · doi:10.1007/bf02527484 · Cited by 11
Measuring teachers’ competence to monitor student interaction in collaborative learning settings
Wiedmann, M., Kaendler, C., Leuders, T., Spada, H., & Rummel, N. (2019) · Unterrichtswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s42010-019-00047-6 · Cited by 11
Investigating stable and dynamic aspects of student motivation using generalizability theory
Lyndon, M., Medvedev, O. N., Chen, Y., & Henning, M. A. (2019) · Australian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajpy.12276 · Cited by 14
Responding to Low Coefficient Alpha: Potential Alternatives to the File Drawer
Chretien, J. L., Nimon, K., Reio, T. G., & Lewis, J. (2020) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484320924151 · Cited by 12
“Based on his revelation, Cronbach began to sketch the components of variance approach to reliability from which he and his associates developed the generalizability theory (G theory; Cronbach et al., 1963, 1972).”
MethodPool, J., Siegert, R. J., Taylor, S. M., Dunford, C., & Magee, W. L. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039713 · Cited by 11
Analyzing Complete Generalizability Theory Designs Using Structural Equation Models
Vispoel, W. P., Hong, H., Lee, H., et al. (2023) · Applied Measurement in Education · doi:10.1080/08957347.2023.2274573 · Cited by 11
“Generalizability theory (GT; Brennan, 2001; Cronbach, Gleser, Nanda, & Rajaratnam, 1972; Cronbach, Rajaratnam, & Gleser, 1963; Shavelson & Webb, 1991) represents a comprehensive framework for evaluating score consistency for both norm and criterion referencing purposes that allows for estimation of…”
BackgroundBlanco-Villaseñor, Á., López, J. R. R., & Vermaes, I. P. R. (2000) · Psicothema · Cited by 11
Models of Inference in Evaluating Brain-Behavior Relationships in Children
Fennell, E. B., & Bauer, R. M. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-78867-8_10 · Cited by 11
Creating short forms for construct measures: The role of exchangeable forms
Hagtvet, K. A., & Sipos, K. (2017) · Pedagogika · Cited by 11
An exploratory study of the generalizability of selected marketing measures
Rentz, J. O. (1988) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02723332 · Cited by 11
Sources of Unreliability in the Diagnosis of Substance Dependence
Feinn, R., Gelernter, J., Cubells, J. F., Farrer, L., & Kranzler, H. R. (2009) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs · doi:10.15288/jsad.2009.70.475 · Cited by 10
“An advantage of generalizability theory is its ability to estimate both inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities from the same dataset simultaneously (Cronbach et al., 1963).”
BackgroundA Generalizability Analysis of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire for Chinese Adolescents
Chen, W., & Gao, R. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.687589 · Cited by 10
Meisel, S. N., Colder, C. R., & Hopwood, C. J. (2022) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2021.2019051 · Cited by 10
“Generalizability theory is an extension of classical test theory and produces reliability coefficients similar to inter-rater reliability coefficients, such as the intraclass correlation (Cranford et al., 2006; Cronbach et al., 1963).”
BackgroundThe Impact of Business Education on Students’ Moral Competency
Stachowicz-Stanusch, A. (2011) · Vision The Journal of Business Perspective · doi:10.1177/097226291101500207 · Cited by 10
Brouer, R. L., Stefanone, M. A., Badawy, R., Egnoto, M. J., & Seitz, S. R. (2015) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2015.226 · Cited by 10
“The robustness of the sample enhances the study’s generalizability to the broader workforce [16] by minimizing the sampling error that might occur from sampling only one organization or group.”
BackgroundAssessing agreement with repeated measures for random observers
Chen, C., & Barnhart, H. X. (2011) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4353 · Cited by 10
A new tool for assessing short debriefings after immersive simulation: validity of the SHORT scale
Rivière, É., Aubin, E., Tremblay, S.-L., Lortie, G., & Chiniara, G. (2019) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-019-1503-4 · Cited by 10
Robitzsch, A. (2022) · European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education · doi:10.3390/ejihpe12070054 · Cited by 10
Perspectives on the Relationship Between Job Performance and Ratings of Job Performance
Murphy, K. R. (2008) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00039.x · Cited by 10
The Calculation of Reliability From a Split-Plot Factorial Design
Brennan, R. L. (1975) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447503500404 · Cited by 10
Test-retest reliability of willingness to pay
Shiell, A., & Hawe, P. (2006) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-006-0349-y · Cited by 10
“Generalizability theory was devised by Cronbach and colleagues [3] to overcome this shortcoming.”
BackgroundTrue Scores, Error, Reliability, and Unit of Analysis in Environment and Behavior Research
Levine, D. W. (1994) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/001391659402600207 · Cited by 10
Inferential Procedures for Multifaceted Coefficients of Generalizability
Schroeder, M. L., & Hakstian, A. R. (1990) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294759 · Cited by 10
Peters, D. L. (1970) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1970.tb01025.x · Cited by 14
Hild, P., Gut, C., & Brückmann, M. (2019) · Research in Science & Technological Education · doi:10.1080/02635143.2018.1552851 · Cited by 9
“Different sources of measurement errors (‘facets’) may be investigated within generalisability (G) studies (Brennan 1996; Cronbach, Rajaratnam, and Gleser 1963).”
BackgroundViolato, C., Englander, R., Dale, E. D., & Gauer, J. L. (2024) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000005907 · Cited by 10
Measurement and Generalizability
Mayfield, M. R., & Mayfield, J. R. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66930-4_9 · Cited by 9
Uzun, N. B., Alıcı, D., & Aktaş, M. (2018) · European Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.12973/eu-jer.8.1.169 · Cited by 9
Moana-Filho, E. J., Alonso, A. A., Kapos, F. P., et al. (2017) · Scandinavian Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.03.007 · Cited by 9
Estudos da Consistência Interna e Fatorial Confirmatórioda Escala Toronto de Alexitimia-20 (ETA-20)
Wiethaeuper, D., Balbinotti, M. A. A., Pelisoli, C., & Barbosa, M. L. L. (2005) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 9
Pryseley, A., Ledent, E. Y., Drewes, A. M., Staahl, C., Olesen, A. E., & Arendt‐Nielsen, L. (2009) · Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology · doi:10.1111/j.1742-7843.2009.00408.x · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Cronbach, L. J., Rajaratnam, N., & Gleser, G. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rajaratnam, Nageswari
- Venue
- British Journal of Statistical Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1963-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 137-163
- ISSN
- 0950-561X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023420063
- Cited by
- 737
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 40.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Statistical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Keywords
- generalizability theory, reliability theory, intraclass correlation coefficient, random sampling, lower bounds, measurement reliability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review