The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THEORY OF GENERALIZABILITY: A LIBERALIZATION OF RELIABILITY THEORY†
Abstract
“Reliability theory” is reinterpreted as a theory regarding the adequac with which one can generalize from one observation to a universe of observations. If the observation is randomly sampled from the universe—whether or not the universe consists of equivalent observations—the intraclass correlation provides an approximate lower bound to the expected value of the desired coefficient of generalizability.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“G-theory, a robust statistical methodology pioneered by Cronbach etal. (1963, 1972), offers a comprehensive analysis of the reliability and generalizability of assessment scores obtained from psychometric scales. It also identifies specific error sources potentially influencing measurements.”
From Investigating state and trait aspects of resilience using Generalizability theory (2024) · cites this paper as Cronbach et al., 1963
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 739
THE AXIOMS AND PRINCIPAL RESULTS OF CLASSICAL TEST THEORY
Novick, M. R. (1965) · ETS Research Bulletin Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.1965.tb00132.x · Cited by 34
Revelle, W., & Condon, D. M. (2018) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118489772.ch23 · Cited by 37
Using Covariance Modeling for Estimating Reliability on Scales with Ordered Polytomous Variables
Brown, R. (1989) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164489492011 · Cited by 34
Generalization: Terminological, methodological and conceptual issues
Edelstein, B. A. (1989) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(89)80052-8 · Cited by 33
Reliability from alpha to omega: a tutorialPreprint
Revelle, W., & Condon, D. M. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/2y3w9 · Cited by 33
Birth order and preschool children's cooperative abilities: A within‐family analysis
Prime, H., Plamondon, A., & Jenkins, J. M. (2017) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjdp.12180 · Cited by 32
Comment on Bartko's "On various intraclass correlation reliability coefficients."
Algina, J. J. (1978) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.1.135 · Cited by 36
Correnti, R., Stein, M., Smith, M. A., Scherrer, J., McKeown, M. G., Greeno, J., & Ashley, K. (2015) · doi:10.3102/978-0-935302-43-1_25 · Cited by 32
Du, H., & Wang, L. (2018) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2018.1457939 · Cited by 31
“Generalizability theory was proposed to consider multiple sources of variances depending on each specific scenario (Cronbach, Gleser, Nanda, and Rajaratnam, 1972; Cronbach, Rajaratnam, and Gleser, 1963).”
BackgroundPauker, S., Perlman, M., Prime, H., & Jenkins, J. M. (2018) · Early Childhood Research Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.05.001 · Cited by 33
Medvedev, O. N., Theadom, A., Barker-Collo, S. L., & Feigin, V. L. (2018) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.5676 · Cited by 41
Shiyko, M., & Ram, N. (2011) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2011.625310 · Cited by 29
“Generalizability theory (Cronbach, et al., 1972; Cronbach et al., 1963) provides a framework for identifying and designing dependable measures (Shavelson & Webb, 1991; Shavelson, Webb, & Rowly, 1989).”
BackgroundAssessing the quality of clinical teaching: a preliminary study
Conigliaro, R. L., & Stratton, T. D. (2010) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03612.x · Cited by 32
Rodríguez, J. R. O. (2005) · Cited by 32
Generalizability Theory as Construct-Related Evidence of the Validity of Job Performance Ratings
Kraiger, K., & Teachout, M. S. (1990) · Human Performance · doi:10.1207/s15327043hup0301_2 · Cited by 32
Language and Reality in Writing Assessment
White, E. M. (1990) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/358159 · Cited by 32
THE GENERALITY OF BEHAVIORAL DATA I: GENERALIZATION FROM OBSERVATIONS ON ONE OCCASION
Magnusson, D., GERZEN, M., & NYMAN, B. (1968) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0303_2 · Cited by 33
Validity of student evaluation of teaching in higher education: a systematic review
Quansah, F., Cobbinah, A., Asamoah-Gyimah, K., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1329734 · Cited by 31
Medvedev, O. N., Dailianis, A. T., Hwang, Y., Krägeloh, C. U., & Singh, N. N. (2020) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-020-01522-3 · Cited by 33
A Perspective on the History of Generabability Theory.
Brennan, R. L. (1997) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1997.tb00604.x · Cited by 31
Variables that affect the dependability of L2 pragmatics tests
Brown, J. D., & Ahn, R. C. (2010) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.026 · Cited by 31
A Method for Analyzing Sparse Data Matrices in the Generalizability Theory Framework
Chiu, C. W. T., & Wolfe, E. W. (2002) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0146621602026003006 · Cited by 31
“Generalizability theory (G theory), developed by Cronbach, Gleser, and Rajaratnam (1963), is often used in the development of performance assessments to identify the relative strengths of multiple sources of measurement error and to make projections concerning how to increase score reliability.”
MethodBruynesteyn, K., van der Heijde, D. M. F. M., Boers, M., van der Linden, S., Lassere, M. N., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.10.014 · Cited by 31
An evaluation of the DSM-II classification of schizophrenia as a nomenclature.
Blashfield, R. K. (1973) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0035351 · Cited by 31
The Effect of Correlated Errors on Estimates of Reliability Coefficients
Maxwell, A. E. (1968) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316446802800309 · Cited by 31
Maximizing the Coefficient of Generalizability in Multi-Facet Decision Studies
Woodward, J. A., & Joe, G. W. (1973) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291112 · Cited by 31
Mayfield, M., & Mayfield, J. R. (2021) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci11020051 · Cited by 42
“It was beyond this study’s scope to examine the effects of specific differences between these settings, but using such varied settings permits us to examine the settings’ effects as a whole and our model’s generalizability (Cronbach et al. 1963; Mayfield and Mayfield 2018b).”
BackgroundBergeron, R., Floyd, R. G., McCormack, A. C., & Farmer, W. L. (2008) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/02796015.2008.12087911 · Cited by 30
“In G theory, “the theory of ‘reliability’ and the theory of ‘validity’ coalesce; the analysis of generalizability indicates how validly one can interpret a measure as representative of a certain set of possible measures” (Cronbach et al., 1963, p. 157).”
BackgroundEffects of organizational structure on correlations between member abilities and group productivity.
O’Brien, G. E., & Owens, A. G. (1969) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0028659 · Cited by 30
Multivariate Generalizability Theory in Educational Measurement: An Empirical Study
Nußbaum, A. (1984) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662168400800211 · Cited by 30
Hedenbro, M., Shapiro, A. F., & Gottman, J. M. (2006) · Family Process · doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2006.00184.x · Cited by 29
Using the Linear Mixed-Effect Model Framework to Estimate Generalizability Variance Components in R
Jiang, Z. (2018) · Methodology · doi:10.1027/1614-2241/a000149 · Cited by 29
The application of generalizability analysis to observational studies
Marcoulides, G. A. (1989) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/bf00151898 · Cited by 29
What to Look for in the Technical Manual
Hutchinson, T. A. (1996) · Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools · doi:10.1044/0161-1461.2702.109 · Cited by 29
Surveying attitude structures: A discussion of principles and procedures
McKennell, A. C. (1974) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/bf00153932 · Cited by 30
Balbinotti, M. A. A., & Barbosa, M. L. L. (2008) · Psico-USF · doi:10.1590/s1413-82712008000100002 · Cited by 35
Determining the Generalizability of Rating Scales in Clinical Settings
Evans, W. J., Cayten, C. G., & Green, P. A. (1981) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198112000-00004 · Cited by 29
Technical Issues in Minimum Competency Testing
Shepard, L. A. (1980) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.2307/1167123 · Cited by 29
Paterson, J., Medvedev, O. N., Sumich, A., Tautolo, E.-S., Krägeloh, C. U., Sisk, R., McNamara, R. K., Berk, M., Narayanan, A., & Siegert, R. J. (2018) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.075 · Cited by 28
Using generalizability theory with continuous latent response variables.
Vispoel, W. P., Morris, C. A., & Kilinc, M. (2018) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000177 · Cited by 28
Chen, D., Hebert, M. A., & Wilson, J. (2022) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312221106773 · Cited by 28
“Due to these sources of measurement error, findings from application studies of generalizability theory (G theory; Brennan, 2001; Cronbach et al., 1963; Cronbach et al., 1972; Shavelson & Webb, 1991) suggest that multiple writing prompts and raters are necessary to improve reliability and make…”
BackgroundNagel, M.-T., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., & Fischer, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.914857 · Cited by 27
“Generalizability Theory distinguishes between different components of the assessment, so-called facets, which can exert an influence on the test scores both individually and in interaction (Cronbach et al., 1963).”
BackgroundA generalizability theory analysis of group process ratings in the treatment of cocaine dependence
Crits-Christoph, P. F., Johnson, J. E., Gallop, R., Gibbons, M. B. C., Ring‐Kurtz, S., Hamilton, J. L., & Tu, X. M. (2011) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2010.551429 · Cited by 28
Estimation of Measurement Error Variance at Specific Score Levels
Feldt, L. S., & Quails, A. L. (1996) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1996.tb00486.x · Cited by 28
Muñiz, J. (1998) · Consultation of the Doctoral Thesis Database (TESEO) (Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte) · Cited by 26
Chapter 7: Cognitive Styles: Some Conceptual, Methodological, and Applied Issues
Shipman, S. L., & Shipman, V. C. (1985) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x012001229 · Cited by 28
Measuring Speech Comprehensibility in Students with Down Syndrome
Yoder, P. J., Woynaroski, T. G., & Camarata, S. (2016) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2015_jslhr-s-15-0149 · Cited by 27
Prime, H., Wade, M., & González, A. (2019) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12907 · Cited by 28
Haven, T. L., Tijdink, J. K., Martinson, B. C., Bouter, L. M., & Oort, F. J. (2021) · Research Integrity and Peer Review · doi:10.1186/s41073-021-00110-w · Cited by 27
de Kleijn, P., van Genderen, F. R., & van Meeteren, N. L. U. (2005) · Haemophilia · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2516.2005.01117.x · Cited by 27
Seat belts: The importance of situational factors
Fhanér, G., & Hane, M. (1973) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/0001-4575(73)90028-6 · Cited by 27
Jiang, Z., & Skorupski, W. P. (2017) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0986-3 · Cited by 28
Barchard, K. A., & Hakstian, A. R. (1997) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3202_4 · Cited by 26
Identification of factors affecting the implementation of data warehousing
Little, R., & Gibson, M. L. (2003) · Proceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences/Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.1109/hicss.1999.772756 · Cited by 26
Habenicht, R., EBENBICHLER, G. R., Bonato, P., Kollmitzer, J., Ziegelbecker, S., Unterlerchner, L., Mair, P., & Kienbacher, T. (2020) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-020-0645-2 · Cited by 24
Weigl, K., Nees, M. A., Eisele, D., & Riener, A. (2022) · Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.trip.2022.100563 · Cited by 25
Reliability of measurement scales
Vehkalahti, K. (2000) · Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja · Cited by 25
Validity in the Next Era of Assessment: Consequences, Social Impact, and Equity
Kinnear, B., St‐Onge, C., Schumacher, D. J., Marceau, M., & Naidu, T. (2024) · Perspectives on Medical Education · doi:10.5334/pme.1150 · Cited by 26
Multi-facet design for goal scoring in soccer-7
Reina-Gómez, Á., Hernández-Mendo, A., & Fernández‐García, J. C. (2009) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-009-9253-8 · Cited by 24
Generalizability and Decision Studies: An Example Using Conversational Language Samples
Bruckner, C. T., Yoder, P. J., & McWilliam, R. A. (2006) · Journal of Early Intervention · doi:10.1177/105381510602800205 · Cited by 24
Metrology of human-based and other qualitative measurements
Pendrill, L., & Petersson, N. (2016) · Measurement Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/0957-0233/27/9/094003 · Cited by 24
Chapter 11 : Persistent Methodological Questions in Educational Testing
Hattie, J., Jaeger, R. M., & Bond, L. (1999) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x024001393 · Cited by 24
Bridgeford, E., Wang, S., Yang, Z., Wang, Z., Xu, T., Craddock, C., Dey, J. K., Kiar, G., Gray-Roncal, W., Colantuoni, C., et al. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/802629 · Cited by 22
Li, G., Xie, J., An, L., Hou, G., Hu, J., & Wang, W. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00241 · Cited by 23
Cross-cultural validation of the stroke riskometer using generalizability theory
Medvedev, O. N., Truong, Q. C., Merkin, A., Borotkanics, R., Krishnamurthi, R., & Feigin, V. L. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-98591-8 · Cited by 27
Reliability Estimates for Undergraduate Grade Point Average
Westrick, P. A. (2017) · Educational Assessment · doi:10.1080/10627197.2017.1381554 · Cited by 22
Gage, N. A., Prykanowski, D. A., & Hirn, R. G. (2014) · Behavioral Disorders · doi:10.1177/019874291303900407 · Cited by 23
The Effects of Sampling Model on Inference with Coefficient Alpha
Barchard, K. A., & Hakstian, A. R. (1997) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164497057006001 · Cited by 23
Attendance behavior: A reevaluation of Latham and Pursell's conclusions.
Ilgen, D. R. (1977) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.62.2.230 · Cited by 23
Durnin, J. H., & Scandura, J. M. (1973) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0034996 · Cited by 23
Interrater reliability for multilevel data: A generalizability theory approach.
ten Hove, D., Jorgensen, T. D., & van der Ark, L. A. (2022) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000391 · Cited by 22
How to Estimate Absolute-Error Components in Structural Equation Models of Generalizability Theory
Jorgensen, T. D. (2021) · Psych · doi:10.3390/psych3020011 · Cited by 25
“[2] began developing a more comprehensive framework capable of assessing reliability not only among a set of tests (or scale items) measuring the same latent construct, but also among any other method of obtaining measurements, such as multiple raters, occasions, or tasks.”
BackgroundMethodMacIntyre, N. J., Bennett, L., Bonnyman, A. M., et al. (2011) · ISRN Rheumatology · doi:10.5402/2011/571698 · Cited by 22
Newton, X. A. (2010) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2010.10.002 · Cited by 22
Mourgues, C., Tan, M., Hein, S. D., Al-Harbi, K., Aljughaiman, A. M., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2015) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.05.005 · Cited by 22
Beurteilereffekte bei der Messung von Unterrichtsqualität
Pietsch, M., & Tosana, S. (2008) · Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s11618-008-0021-7 · Cited by 22
Why Generalisability is not Generalisable
Fendler, L. (2006) · Journal of Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9752.2006.00520.x · Cited by 22
Kienbacher, T., Habenicht, R., Starek, C., et al. (2014) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-11-106 · Cited by 23
Classification and evaluation of problem-solving tasks
Speedie, S. M., Treffinger, D. J., & Houtz, J. C. (1976) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/0361-476x(76)90007-2 · Cited by 23
A model for assessing potential adaptation to stress
Erickson, H., & Swain, M. A. (1982) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.4770050210 · Cited by 22
Statistical Analysis for Single-Case Designs
Yarnold, P. R. (1992) · Social psychological applications to social issues · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2308-0_9 · Cited by 22
Investigating state and trait aspects of resilience using Generalizability theory
Child, L. E., & Medvedev, O. N. (2024) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-05072-4 · Cited by 23
“…overall reliability of measuring resilience, identify sources of the measurement error and distinguish between state and trait aspects of resilience using appropriate methodology such as Generalizability theory (G-theory; Cronbach et al., 1963, 1972; Bloch & Norman, 2012; Medvedev et al., 2017).”
A Ranking Method for Evaluating Constructed Responses
Attali, Y. (2014) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164414527450 · Cited by 21
Estimating Reliability and Generalizability from Hierarchical Biomedical Data
Molenberghs, G., Laenen, A., & Vangeneugden, T. (2007) · Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10543400701329448 · Cited by 21
“In such situations, generalizability theory (Cronbach et al., 1963) can be of use.”
BackgroundTreating Speech Comprehensibility in Students With Down Syndrome
Yoder, P. J., Camarata, S., & Woynaroski, T. G. (2016) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2015_jslhr-s-15-0148 · Cited by 20
Differential growth in doctor–patient communications skills
van Es, J. M., Waard, M. W., & Visser, M. R. M. (2013) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12175 · Cited by 21
Conceptual engineering and operationalism in psychology
Vessonen, E. (2021) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-021-03261-x · Cited by 22
Oh, D. M., Kim, J. M., Garcia, R. E., & Krilowicz, B. L. (2005) · AJP Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00039.2004 · Cited by 20
“An intraclass correlation, confidence interval, and standard error of measurement (SEM) were used to assess the interrater reliability of the instructors’ ratings (12).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDurvasula, S., & Lysonski, S. J. (2016) · Journal of Global Marketing · doi:10.1080/08911762.2016.1138564 · Cited by 20
“It is important to note that G-theory is not new given that it was discussed by Cronbach, Rajarathnam, and Gleser (1963) in their famous book.”
BackgroundInterrater Reliability of Osteopathic Sacral Palpatory Diagnostic Tests Among Osteopathy Students
Consorti, G., Basile, F., Pugliese, L., et al. (2018) · Journal of Osteopathic Medicine · doi:10.7556/jaoa.2018.132 · Cited by 20
Homogeneity and variation in measuring personality.
Fiske, D. W. (1963) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0042883 · Cited by 20
Dennis, M. L., & Davis, J. P. (2021) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108414 · Cited by 19
Vessonen, E. (2020) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959354320945036 · Cited by 19
“Roughly put, generalizability theory says that a measurement procedure is valid to the extent that it provides accurate estimates of the universe of observations that define the target concept (Cronbach et al., 1963; cf. Kane, 1982, p. 134).”
BackgroundMethodDeveloping and piloting a form for student assessment of faculty professionalism
Todhunter, S., Cruess, S. R., Cruess, R. L., Young, M. E., & Steinert, Y. (2010) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-010-9257-0 · Cited by 20
Vispoel, W. P., Morris, C. A., & Kilinc, M. (2018) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2018.1457938 · Cited by 19
Rae, G. (2006) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1348/000711005x72485 · Cited by 19
Vispoel, W. P., Lee, H., Chen, T., & Hong, H. (2023) · Psych · doi:10.3390/psych5020019 · Cited by 18
“[1] first introduced generalizability theory (GT) to the research community, and it continues to provide an elegant framework for conceptualizing how different sources of measurement error affect scores from assessment measures and how that information can be used to evaluate and improve such measures.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialVispoel, W. P., Hong, H., & Lee, H. (2023) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2023.2187734 · Cited by 18
“To be consistent with generalization assumptions of GT, item loadings, uniquenesses, and thresholds (when relevant) would be set equal across occasions in both models.”
BackgroundInfluentialDonnellan, E., Usami, S., & Murayama, K. (2023) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000587 · Cited by 20
Ant colony optimization for parallel test assembly
Zimny, L., Schroeders, U., & Wilhelm, O. (2024) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02319-7 · Cited by 22
“However, the issue of generalizability is not specific to ACO but concerns the validity of psychological assessment in general (Cronbach et al., 1963).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Cronbach, L. J., Rajaratnam, N., & Gleser, G. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rajaratnam, Nageswari
- Venue
- British Journal of Statistical Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1963-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 137-163
- ISSN
- 0950-561X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023420063
- Cited by
- 737
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 40.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Statistical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Keywords
- generalizability theory, reliability theory, intraclass correlation coefficient, random sampling, lower bounds, measurement reliability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review