Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 894

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transactional versus transformational leadership: An analysis of the MLQ

Open access
Den Hartog, Deanne N., VAN Muijen, Jaap J., Koopman, Paul L.·1997·Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
DOI 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1997.tb00628.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A questionnaire used often to measure transformational, transactional and laissez‐faire leadership is the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire developed by Bass (Bass & Avolio, 1989). This study aims to test the factor structure of the MLQ as developed by Bass & Avolio. The MLQ‐8Y was analysed using data collected in Dutch organizations. Seven hundred employees from eight organizations rated their leader's behaviour with the MLQ. First, an indication of the internal consistency of the scales developed by Bass is reported. The results of subsequent factor analyses show that the three types of leadership can be found in the data; however, the scales found here are slightly different from Bass' scales. Especially, the transactional and laissez‐faire scales have been altered on theoretical and empirical grounds. The adapted version of the MLQ covers the domain with fewer items.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1997.tb00628.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Den Hartog, D. N., VAN Muijen, J. J., & Koopman, P. L.
Venue
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-03
Volume
70
Issue
1
Pages
19-34
ISSN
  • 0963-1798 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8325
DOI
10.1111/j.2044-8325.1997.tb00628.x
OpenAlex
W2128747453
Cited by
894
References
1
FWCI
11.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.