Cited by 234Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFace Recognition and Perception

Components of person perception: An investigation with autistic, non-autistic retarded and typically developing children and adolescents

Moore, Derek G., Hobson, R. Peter, Lee, Anthony·1997·British Journal of Developmental Psychology

Abstract

This study is an attempt to analyse whether there may be separable components to the human ability to perceive people as people who engage in actions and who have attitudes. We adopted the approach of developmental psychopathology. Matched groups of typically developing, autistic and non‐autistic retarded (MR) children and adolescents were tested for the ability to recognize videotaped representations of ‘a person’, a person's actions and a person's emotion‐related attitudes and allied subjective states as manifest in moving point‐light images of people. Autistic and non‐autistic MR participants did not differ in the ability to recognize that a person was represented in very brief exposures of a walking point‐light display; autistic, MR and typically developing participants were equally able to recognize a person's actions. Non‐autistic MR and typically developing participants were also similar in their propensity to notice a person's attitudes vis‐à‐vis the person's actions, and in their abilities to recognize actions and attitudes when specifically asked to do so. By comparison, however, autistic participants were specifically impaired in attending to and discriminating people's attitudes and states. The results are discussed in relation to current debates on the nature of basic person‐perceptual abilities that may underpin typically developing children's understanding of persons with minds ('theory of mind'). We also consider their relevance for controversies over the primary deficits in autism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2044-835x.1997.tb00738.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There was no formal attempt to match the speed or complexity of the local motion content of the stimuli in Hubert et al. (2007) and Moore et al. (1997).

    “there was no formal attempt to match the speed or complexity of the local motion content of the stimuli.”

    From Vision in autism spectrum disorders (2009) · cites this paper as Moore et al. (1997)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moore, D. G., Hobson, R. P., & Lee, A.
Affiliations
The Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Moore, Derek G.
  • Hobson, R. Peter
Venue
British Journal of Developmental Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-11
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
401-423
ISSN
  • 0261-510X (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-835X
OpenAlex
W1987821529
Cited by
229
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 20
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
person perception, autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, theory of mind, point-light displays, facial expression recognition, emotion recognition, human action recognition, social cognition, developmental psychopathology, children and adolescents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review