Cited by 68Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Mothers' prenatal stress and their children's antisocial outcomes – a moderating role for the Dopamine D4 Receptor ( DRD 4) gene

Open access
Zohsel, Katrin, Buchmann, Arlette F., Blomeyer, Dorothea, Hohm, Erika, Schmidt, Martin H., Esser, Günter, Brandeis, Daniel, Banaschewski, Tobias +1 more·2014·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Maternal distress during pregnancy has been linked to aggressive behavior in offspring. This effect has been interpreted in terms of ‘fetal programming’. The 7‐repeat (7r) allele of a VNTR polymorphism in exon III of the human dopamine receptor D4 ( DRD 4) has consistently been associated with externalizing behavior problems, especially in the presence of adverse environmental factors. So far, it is not known whether the DRD 4 genotype moderates the effect of prenatal maternal stress on the development of childhood antisocial behavior. Methods: As part of an ongoing epidemiological cohort study, prenatal maternal stress was assessed using self‐report 3 months following child birth. When children were 8, 11, and 15 years old, mothers rated their children's externalizing behavior, and diagnoses of conduct disorder and/or oppositional defiant disorder ( CD / ODD ) according to DSM ‐ IV were obtained. In a sample of N = 308 participants, the effects of the DRD 4 genotype, prenatal maternal stress, and the interaction thereof on antisocial outcome were tested. Results: Under conditions of elevated prenatal maternal stress, children carrying one or two DRD 4 7r alleles were at increased risk of a diagnosis of CD / ODD . Moreover, homozygous carriers of the DRD 4 7r allele displayed more externalizing behavior following exposure to higher levels of prenatal maternal stress, while homozygous carriers of the DRD 4 4r allele turned out to be insensitive to the effects of prenatal stress. Conclusions: This study is the first to report a gene–environment interaction related to DRD 4 and prenatal maternal stress using data from a prospective study, which extends earlier findings on the impact of prenatal maternal stress with respect to childhood antisocial behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcpp.12138

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Homozygous 4 R carriers were insensitive to prenatal stress.

    “Homozygous 4 R carriers -> insensitive to prenatal stress”

    From Genetics of child aggression, a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as Zohsel [84]

  • There was a gene-environment interaction: homozygous 7 R carriers with increased prenatal stress showed increased externalizing behaviors.

    “GxE: Homozygous 7 R carriers + increased prenatal stress -> increased externalizing behaviors”

    From Genetics of child aggression, a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as Zohsel [84]

  • Larger repeat allele (7 R or 6-8 R)-carrying DRD4 genotypes were associated with higher externalizing behaviors or aggression compared to 7 R non-carrying genotypes only in the context of maternal insensitivity, high maternal prenatal stress, or low-aggression peer play environment.

    “More specifically, larger repeat allele (7 R or 6-8 R)-carrying genotypes were associated with higher externalizing behaviors or aggression compared to 7 R non-carrying genotypes (e.g., 2–4 R) only in the context of maternal insensitivity [83], high maternal prenatal stress [84], or low-aggression peer play environment [85].”

    From Genetics of child aggression, a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [84]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zohsel, K., Buchmann, A. F., Blomeyer, D., Hohm, E., Schmidt, M. H., Esser, G., Brandeis, D., Banaschewski, T., & Laucht, M.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • University of Potsdam (DE)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Laucht, Manfred
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-09-14
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
69-76
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2041158650
Cited by
68
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 8
FWCI
11.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • publish.UP (University of Potsdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
Eli Lilly and Company
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
prenatal stress, dopamine D4 receptor gene, gene-environment interaction, childhood antisocial behavior, conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, externalizing problems, fetal programming
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Female, Genotype, Humans, Infant, Male, Mothers, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Prospective Studies, Stress, Psychological, Conduct Disorder, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders, Receptors, Dopamine D4, Gene-Environment Interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review