Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 221

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Guidelines on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis

Open access
Knobler, R., Berlin, G., Calzavara‐Pinton, P., Greinix, H., Jaksch, P., Laroche, L., Ludvigsson, J., Quaglino, P., Reinisch, W., Scarisbrick, J., Schwarz, T., Wolf, P., Arenberger, P., Assaf, C., Bagot, M., Barr, M., Bohbot, A., Bruckner‐Tuderman, L., Dreno, B., Enk, A., French, L., Gniadecki, R., Gollnick, H., Hertl, M., Jantschitsch, C., Jung, A., Just, U., Klemke, C.‐D., Lippert, U., Luger, T., Papadavid, E., Pehamberger, H., Ranki, A., Stadler, R., Sterry, W., Wolf, I.H., Worm, M., Zic, J., Zouboulis, C.C., Hillen, U.·2014·Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

Abstract

Background: After the first investigational study on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis for the treatment of cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma was published in 1983 with its subsequent recognition by the FDA for its refractory forms, the technology has shown significant promise in the treatment of other severe and refractory conditions in a multi‐disciplinary setting. Among the major studied conditions are graft versus host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, systemic sclerosis, solid organ transplant rejection and inflammatory bowel disease. Materials and methods: In order to provide recognized expert practical guidelines for the use of this technology for all indications the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) proceeded to address these questions in the hands of the recognized experts within and outside the field of dermatology. This was done using the recognized and approved guidelines of EDF for this task. Results and conclusion: These guidelines provide at present the most comprehensive available expert recommendations for the use of extracorporeal photopheresis based on the available published literature and expert consensus opinion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jdv.12311

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 221

Metadata

Authors
Knobler, R., Berlin, G., Calzavara‐Pinton, P., Greinix, H., Jaksch, P., Laroche, L., Ludvigsson, J., Quaglino, P., Reinisch, W., Scarisbrick, J., Schwarz, T., Wolf, P., Arenberger, P., Assaf, C., Bagot, M., Barr, M., Bohbot, A., Bruckner‐Tuderman, L., Dreno, B., Enk, A., French, L., Gniadecki, R., Gollnick, H., Hertl, M., Jantschitsch, C., Jung, A., Just, U., Klemke, C. ‐., Lippert, U., Luger, T., Papadavid, E., Pehamberger, H., Ranki, A., Stadler, R., Sterry, W., Wolf, I. H., Worm, M., Zic, J., Zouboulis, C. C., & Hillen, U.
Venue
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-12-19
Volume
28
Issue
s1
Pages
1-37
ISSN
  • 0926-9959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3083
OpenAlex
W2086092185
Cited by
221
References
6
FWCI
12.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guidelines on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jdv.12311
The paper
Knobler, R., Berlin, G., Calzavara‐Pinton, P., Greinix, H., Jaksch, P., Laroche, L., Ludvigsson, J., Quaglino, P., Reinisch, W., Scarisbrick, J., Schwarz, T., Wolf, P., Arenberger, P., Assaf, C., Bagot, M., Barr, M., Bohbot, A., Bruckner‐Tuderman, L., Dreno, B., . . . Hillen, U. (2014). Guidelines on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.12311

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.