Cited by 99Nutritional Studies and DietDiet and metabolism studiesDiabetes Treatment and Management

The impact of major dietary patterns on glycemic control, cardiovascular risk factors, and weight loss in patients with type 2 diabetes: A network meta‐analysis

Pan, Bei, Wu, Yiting, Yang, Qingxia, Ge, Long, Gao, Caiyun, Xun, Yangqin, Tian, Jinhui, Ding, Guowu·2019·Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Abstract

Objective: To comprehensively compare the differences between major dietary patterns in improving glycemic control, cardiovascular risk, and weight loss for patients with type 2 diabetes. Method: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy of Mediterranean, low‐carbohydrate, and/or low‐fat dietary patterns for patients with type 2 diabetes. Studies that compared any one of those diets with regular diet were also included. The risk of bias in eligible RCTs was evaluated according to the Cochrane Handbook. The primary outcome was glycemic control. Secondary outcomes included weight loss and cardiovascular risk factors. A network meta‐analysis was performed using R‐3.3.2. Results: Ten RCTs involving five dietary patterns met the eligibility criteria. The findings revealed that compared to low‐fat diet, Mediterranean diet showed beneficial effects in glycemic control (HbA1c [%]: MD = –0.45, 95% CI = –0.55 to –0.34; fasting plasma glucose [mmol/L]: MD = –1.24 95% CI = –1.57 to –0.91, respectively; weight loss [kg]: MD =–1.18, 95% CI = –1.99 to –0.37; waist circumference [cm]: MD = –0.73, 95% CI = –1.26 to –0.19), and cardiovascular risk factors (HDL‐cholesterol [mmol/L]: MD = 0.07, 95% CI = 0.04 to 0.11; total cholesterol [mmol/L]: MD = –0.17, 95% CI = –0.26 to –0.08; triglycerides [mmol/L]: MD = –0.21, 95% CI = –0.27 to –0.16). Network meta‐analysis showed that high‐carbohydrate diet improved HDL‐cholesterol (mmol/l) (MD = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.39 to 1.68) when compared with regular diet. The differences were not statistically significant in other indirect comparison groups for other outcomes. Conclusions: A mediterranean diet showed beneficial improvements in glycemic control, weight loss, and cardiovascular risk factors in people with type 2 diabetes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jebm.12312

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pan, B., Wu, Y., Yang, Q., Ge, L., Gao, C., Xun, Y., Tian, J., & Ding, G.
Affiliations
  • Lanzhou University (CN)
  • Lanzhou University Second Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Ding, Guowu
Venue
Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-08
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
29-39
ISSN
  • 1756-5383 (ISSN-L)
  • 1756-5391
OpenAlex
W2886474148
Cited by
99
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7
FWCI
7.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Lanzhou University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, Mediterranean diet, low-carbohydrate diet, low-fat diet, high-carbohydrate diet, dietary habits, glycemic control, HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, weight loss, waist circumference, cardiovascular risk factors, HDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglycerides, lipid profile, diet comparison, indirect comparison, risk of bias
MeSH terms
Network Meta-Analysis, Blood Glucose, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Dietary Fats, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Cholesterol, HDL, Risk Factors, Triglycerides, Weight Loss, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Diet, Mediterranean, Waist Circumference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review