Cited by 505Intensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersAlcoholism and Thiamine DeficiencyAnesthesia and Sedative Agents

Antipsychotic medication for prevention and treatment of delirium in hospitalized adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Neufeld, Karin J., Yue, Jirong, Robinson, Thomas N., Inouye, Sharon K., Needham, Dale M.·2016·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of antipsychotic medications in preventing and treating delirium. Design: Systematic review and meta‐analysis. Setting: PubMed, EMBASE , CINAHL , and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched from January 1, 1988, to November 26, 2013. Participants: Adult surgical and medical inpatients. Intervention: Antipsychotic administration for delirium prevention or treatment in randomized controlled trials or cohort studies. Measurements: Two authors independently reviewed all citations, extracted relevant data, and assessed studies for potential bias. Heterogeneity was considered as chi‐square P < .1 or I 2 > 50%. Using a random‐effects model (I 2 > 50%) or a fixed‐effects model (I 2 < 50%), odds ratios ( OR s) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes (delirium incidence and mortality), and mean or standardized mean difference for continuous outcomes (delirium duration, severity, hospital and intensive care unit ( ICU ) length of stay ( LOS )). Sensitivity analyses included postoperative prevention studies only, exclusion of studies with high risk of bias, and typical versus atypical antipsychotics. Results: Screening of 10,877 eligible records identified 19 studies. In seven studies comparing antipsychotics with placebo or no treatment for delirium prevention after surgery, there was no significant effect on delirium incidence ( OR = 0.56, 95% confidence interval ( CI ) = 0.23–1.34, I 2 = 93%). Using data reported from all 19 studies, antipsychotic use was not associated with change in delirium duration, severity, or hospital or ICU LOS , with high heterogeneity among studies. No association with mortality was detected ( OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.62–1.29, I 2 = 0%). Conclusion: Current evidence does not support the use of antipsychotics for prevention or treatment of delirium. Additional methodologically rigorous studies using standardized outcome measures are needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jgs.14076

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the UK, detection rates have increased over the past 10 years.

    “In the UK however, detection rates have increased over the past 10 years.281”

    From Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission (2020) · cites this paper as [281]

    The Methods (Data Analysis; page unavailable) and Results (Mortality; page unavailable) address antipsychotic treatment outcomes, not UK delirium detection trends. Searches for UK detection rates and changes over a decade found no passage in our copy addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • While antipsychotics such as risperidone, haloperidol, ziprasidone and olanzapine are sometimes used to manage agitation or psychotic symptoms in delirium, there is a lack of strong evidence to support their use.

    “While antipsychotics such as risperidone, haloperidol, ziprasi­done and olanzapine are sometimes used to manage agitation or psychotic symptoms in delirium, there is a lack of strong evidence to support their use 194 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neufeld, K. J., Yue, J., Robinson, T. N., Inouye, S. K., & Needham, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Sichuan University (CN)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Neufeld, Karin J.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03-23
Volume
64
Issue
4
Pages
705-714
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2310520207
Cited by
505
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 15
FWCI
9.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • John A. Hartford Foundation (2009–0079)
  • National Institute on Aging (K07AG041835, P01AG031720)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Keywords
antipsychotic drugs, delirium, delirium prevention, delirium management, hospitalized adults, surgical patients, medical inpatients, postoperative delirium, delirium duration, delirium severity, length of hospital stay, mortality, atypical antipsychotics, typical antipsychotics
MeSH terms
Adult, Delirium, Hospitalization, Humans, Antipsychotic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review