Cited by 123Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchChronic Disease Management StrategiesCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Association Between Accelerated Multimorbidity and Age‐Related Cognitive Decline in Older Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging Participants without Dementia

Open access
Fabbri, Elisa, An, Yang, Zoli, Marco, Tanaka, Toshiko, Simonsick, Eleanor M., Kitner‐Triolo, Melissa H., Studenski, Stephanie A., Resnick, Susan M. +1 more·2016·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the association between rate of physical health deterioration, operationalized as rising multimorbidity overtime, and longitudinal decline in cognitive function in older adults without dementia. Design: Longitudinal (Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA)). Setting: Community. Participants: BLSA participants aged 65 and older followed for an average of 3 years and free of dementia or mild cognitive impairment ( MCI ) at baseline and follow‐up ( N = 756). Measurements: Standardized neurocognitive tests evaluating mental status, memory, executive function, processing speed, and verbal fluency were administered. Multimorbidity was assessed at each visit as number of diagnosed chronic diseases from a predefined list. Faster accumulation of chronic diseases was defined as upper quartile of rate of change in number of diseases over time (≥0.25 diseases/year). Results: Faster accumulation of chronic diseases was significantly associated with greater rate of decline on the Category ( P = .01) and Letter ( P = .01) Fluency Tests. Similar trends were also found for the Trail‐Making Test Parts A ( P = .08) and B ( P = .07); no association was found with rate of change in visual and verbal memory. Conclusion: Although further investigations are required to validate the results and fully understand the underlying mechanisms, these findings suggest that accelerated deterioration of physical health is associated with accelerated decline with aging in specific cognitive domains in older adults without dementia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jgs.14092

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In humans, the distinguishing criteria for normal versus pathological aging are CNS injury, amyloid plaques, neurodegeneration, neuropsychiatric conditions, dementia, and impaired performance on cognitive tests.

    “In humans, the distinguishing criteria for normal vs pathological aging are: central nervous system (CNS) injury, amyloid plaques (based on positron emission tomography (PET)), neurodegeneration, neuropsychiatric conditions, dementia, and impaired performance on cognitive tests (Arani et al, 2015;Fabbri et al, 2016;Tegeler et al, 2016).”

    From Microglia Priming with Aging and Stress (2017) · cites this paper as Fabbri et al, 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fabbri, E., An, Y., Zoli, M., Tanaka, T., Simonsick, E. M., Kitner‐Triolo, M. H., Studenski, S. A., Resnick, S. M., & Ferrucci, L.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Bologna (IT)
Corresponding author
Fabbri, Elisa
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-04-30
Volume
64
Issue
5
Pages
965-972
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2342455979
Cited by
123
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3
FWCI
9.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (03‐AG‐0325)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
multimorbidity, age-related cognitive decline, physical health deterioration, older adults without dementia, verbal fluency, executive function, Trail Making Test, Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Chronic Disease, Female, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Baltimore, Comorbidity, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review