Cited by 46Attachment and Relationship DynamicsIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

Insecure attachment behavior and partner violence: incorporating couple perceptions of insecure attachment and relational aggression

Oka, Megan, Sandberg, Jonathan G., Bradford, Angela B., Brown, Andrew·2014·Journal of Marital and Family Therapy

Abstract

Intimate partner violence and insecure attachment are therapeutically relevant concepts when working with couples. The link between attachment and intimate partner violence has been examined in the literature, but an area of aggression that often goes unexamined is relational aggression, or using third parties as a means of being aggressive toward a partner. We asked how participants' attachment behaviors were related to their own and partners' relational and physical aggression. We used structural equation modeling to estimate actor-partner interdependence among these relationships in 644 heterosexual couples. Results indicated significant partner paths from attachment to relational aggression, as well as significant actor paths between relational aggression and physical aggression. Implications were discussed. Data for this study were collected from the RELATE assessment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jmft.12079

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study of Oka et al. (2014) may be biased by methodological issues as IPV was measured throughout only three items extracted from the Conflict Tactics Scale-Revised.

    “However, the study of Oka et al. (2014) may be biased by methodological issues as IPV was measured throughout only three items extracted from the Conflict Tactics Scale-Revised.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oka, M., Sandberg, J. G., Bradford, A. B., & Brown, A.
Affiliations
  • Utah State University (US)
  • Brigham Young University (US)
Corresponding author
Oka, Megan
Venue
Journal of Marital and Family Therapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-06-04
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
412-429
ISSN
  • 0194-472X (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-0606
OpenAlex
W2158713100
Cited by
46
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Marital and Family Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
insecure attachment, intimate partner violence, relational aggression, physical aggression, actor-partner interdependence, heterosexual couples, attachment behavior
MeSH terms
Adult, Aggression, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Object Attachment, Psychological Tests, Spouse Abuse, Spouses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review