Cited by 52Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceAttachment and Relationship DynamicsCrime Patterns and Interventions

A dyadic analysis of partner violence and adult attachment

Sommer, Johannah, Babcock, Julia, Sharp, Carla·2017·Journal of Family Violence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10896-016-9868-1

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies found that sexual IPV victimization correlated positively and significantly with attachment anxiety, with coefficient reaching 0.53.

    “Some found that sexual IPV victimization correlated positively and significantly with anxiety (Sommer et al., 2017; Smagur et al., 2018) with coefficient reaching 0.53.”
  • Regarding gender differences, there is a prevalence of anxiety and avoidance in both male and female physical IPV perpetrators.

    “Regarding gender differences, they are consistent with the trend, showing a prevalence of anxiety and avoidance in both male and female physical IPV perpetrators (González et al., 2016; Sommer et al., 2017).”
  • One study confronted male and female groups and found that both female and male samples presented a significant rate of attachment anxiety, but only male results displayed a correlation between sexual IPV and avoidance.

    “Regarding gender difference, one study (Sommer et al., 2017) confronted male and female groups and it resulted that both female and male sample presented a significant rate of attachment anxiety but only male results displayed a correlation between sexual IPV and avoidance.”
  • Some studies found that the relationship between avoidant attachment and both physical and sexual IPV victimization was significant only among males.

    “some studies found that the relationship between avoidant attachment and both physical (Bond and Bond, 2004; Karakurt et al., 2013) and sexual (Sommer et al., 2017) IPV victimization was significant only among males.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sommer, J., Babcock, J., & Sharp, C.
Affiliations
University of Houston (US)
Corresponding author
Sommer, Johannah
Venue
Journal of Family Violence
Published
2016-09-09
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
279-290
ISSN
  • 0885-7482 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2851
OpenAlex
W2508725719
Cited by
51
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5
FWCI
5.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Family Violence (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R03 MH066943-01A1)
  • University of Houston
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
intimate partner violence, adult attachment, attachment avoidance, attachment anxiety, physical assault, psychological aggression, sexual coercion, heterosexual couples, dyadic analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review