Cited by 23Acne and Rosacea Treatments and EffectsComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesDermatologic Treatments and Research

A comparative study on the effectiveness of herbal extracts vs 2.5% benzoyl peroxide in the treatment of mild to moderate acne vulgaris

Lubtikulthum, Patrida, Kamanamool, Nanticha, Udompataikul, Montree·2019·Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology

Abstract

Background: Although there is a standard guideline for the treatment of acne, it is still a common skin disease, and suboptimal medication adherence is a major reason for treatment failure. Herbal extracts are an interesting alternative medicine because they consist of a variety of active ingredients. Moreover, herbal extracts may have improved therapeutic efficacy because of the combination of various herbs. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of herbal extracts for the treatment of mild to moderate acne vulgaris. Methods: A total of 77 patients were randomized to receive either an herbal extract or 2.5% benzoyl peroxide, which were applied for a period of 12 weeks. Acne lesion counts, adherence, porphyrin counts, the Dermatology Life Quality Index, satisfaction and side effects were assessed. Result: At the 12‐week point, the acne lesion counts decreased, with statistically significant differences from the baseline values in both groups and for all types of acne (P‐value < 0.001). The adherence rate was significantly higher in the patients using the herbal extract than in the patients using 2.5% benzoyl peroxide (P‐value = 0.002). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of porphyrin counts, spot scores, the Dermatology Life Quality Index or satisfaction with efficacy between the groups; however, satisfaction with drug administration was significantly higher in the patients using the herbal extract (P‐value = 0.001). Conclusion: Herbal extracts could be beneficial for anti‐acne pharmaceutical preparations and may be used as an alternative medicine for patients with mild to moderate acne vulgaris who do not adhere to benzoyl peroxide treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jocd.12962

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lubtikulthum, P., Kamanamool, N., & Udompataikul, M.
Affiliations
Srinakharinwirot University (TH)
Corresponding author
Udompataikul, Montree
Venue
Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-04-23
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
1767-1775
ISSN
  • 1473-2130 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-2165
OpenAlex
W2941798570
Cited by
23
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Srinakharinwirot University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Keywords
acne, plant extracts, benzoyl peroxide, medication adherence, acne lesion count, Dermatology Life Quality Index, patient satisfaction, complementary and alternative medicine
MeSH terms
Acne Vulgaris, Benzoyl Peroxide, Dermatologic Agents, Female, Humans, Male, Plant Extracts, Quality of Life, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Drug Monitoring, Patient Satisfaction, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review