Cited by 1,494Corporate Finance and GovernanceFinancial Markets and Investment StrategiesPolitical Influence and Corporate Strategies

Behind the Scenes: The Corporate Governance Preferences of Institutional Investors

Open access
McCAHERY, JOSEPH A., SAUTNER, ZACHARIAS, STARKS, LAURA T.·2016·The Journal of Finance

Abstract

We survey institutional investors to better understand their role in the corporate governance of firms. Consistent with a number of theories, we document widespread behind‐the‐scenes intervention as well as governance‐motivated exit. These governance mechanisms are viewed as complementary devices, with intervention typically occurring prior to a potential exit. We further find that long‐term investors and investors that are less concerned about stock liquidity intervene more intensively. Finally, we find that most investors use proxy advisors and believe that the information provided by such advisors improves their own voting decisions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jofi.12393

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The widespread use of private investor intervention regarding climate topics supports the interpretation that many investors first engage firms through negotiations and take public actions only once the private interventions fail.

    “The widespread use of private investor intervention regarding climate topics supports the interpretation from their article that many investors first engage firms through negotiations and take public actions only once the private interventions fail.”

    From The Importance of Climate Risks for Institutional Investors (2020) · cites this paper as McCahery, Sautner, and Starks (2016)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCAHERY, J. A., SAUTNER, Z., & STARKS, L. T.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Venue
The Journal of Finance
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-11-10
Volume
71
Issue
6
Pages
2905-2932
ISSN
  • 0022-1082 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-6261
OpenAlex
W1949455802
Cited by
1,494
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 135 · 2025: 180 · 2024: 148 · 2023: 191 · 2022: 147 · 2021: 128 · 2020: 125 · 2019: 138 · 2018: 94 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
FWCI
420.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Finance (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Tilburg University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Corporate Finance and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Keywords
institutional investors, corporate governance, proxy advisors, shareholder voting, long-term investors, stock liquidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review