The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning in the Limit: Income Inference from Credit Extensions
Abstract
Combining a randomized controlled trial with administrative and survey data, this paper shows that credit limit extensions significantly increase total spending and income expectations. By controlling for changes in personal income expectations, the spending response to credit limit extensions weakens by approximately 30%. For financially unconstrained consumers, expectation changes account for around two‐thirds of the spending responses to limit extensions. These findings are consistent with consumers inferring future income from credit supply.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Predictably Unequal? The Effects of Machine Learning on Credit Markets
FUSTER, A., GOLDSMITH‐PINKHAM, P., RAMADORAI, T., & WALTHER, A. (2022) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.13090 · Cited by 872
Gross, D. B., & Souleles, N. S. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355302753399472 · Cited by 867
Predictably Unequal? The Effects of Machine Learning on Credit Markets
Fuster, A., Goldsmith-Pinkham, P. S., Ramadorai, T., & Walther, A. (2017) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3072038 · Cited by 769
Research works printed but not linked: 55
- 10.3982/ECTA10266 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/qje/qjx027 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1257/mac.20170403 · DOI
- Ameriks John JosephBriggs AndrewCaplin Matthew D.Shapiro andChristopherTonetti 2016 The long‐term‐care insurance puzzle: Modeling and measurement NBER Working Paper 22726. · DOI
- 10.1093/restud/rdac008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/qje/qjae032 · DOI
- 10.1257/aer.20191178 · DOI
- 10.1093/restud/rdy068 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/698106 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2013.12.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1257/aer.20181735 · DOI
- 10.1016/bs.hesbe.2018.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/jofi.13261 · DOI
- Beutel Johannes andMichaelWeber 2023 Beliefs and portfolios: Causal evidence Working paper. · doi:10.1257/rct.9576
- 10.1111/jofi.12833 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jue.2008.07.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00806.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/rfs/hhad039 · DOI
- 10.1093/restud/rdad045 · doi:10.1093/restud/rdad045
- 10.1257/aer.20221167 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/665662 · DOI · Paper page
- Colarieti Riccardo PeiMei andStefanieStantcheva 2024 The how and why of household reactions to income shocks NBER Working Paper 32191. · DOI
- D'Acunto Francesco ThomasRauter ChristophScheuch andMichaelWeber 2020 Perceived precautionary savings motives: Evidence from digital banking Working paper. · DOI
- D'Acunto Francesco MichaelWeber andXiaoYin 2024 Subjective income expectations and household debt choices NBER Working Paper 32715. · DOI
- 10.1257/jel.47.2.315 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/rfs/hhae010 · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhae010
- 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2015.01.002 · DOI
- 10.1257/aer.20200243 · DOI · Paper page
- Gorodnichenko Yuriy andXiaoYin 2024 Higher‐order beliefs and risky asset holdings NBER Working Paper 32680. · doi:10.3386/w32680
- 10.1257/mac.20160287 · DOI
- 10.1093/qje/qjx005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/260724 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/jofi.13277 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.03.004 · DOI
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199383146.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1093/qje/qjw027 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00733.x · DOI · Paper page
- Kuchler Theresa MonikaPiazzesi andJohannesStroebel 2022 Housing market expectations NBER Working Paper 29909. · DOI
- 10.1257/aer.97.1.402 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/qje/qjx014 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1162/003465399558364 · DOI · Paper page
- Matcham William 2025 Risk‐based borrowing limits in credit card markets Working paper. · DOI
- 10.1162/003355302320935034 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00537.x · DOI · Paper page
- Maxted Peter 2024 Present bias unconstrained: Consumption welfare and the present‐bias dilemma Working paper. · DOI
- 10.1093/qje/qjx017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/qje/qjy004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2006.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1257/mac.20190056 · DOI
- Sergeyev Dmitriy ChenLian andYuriyGorodnichenko 2023 The economics of financial stress Working paper. · DOI
- 10.1287/mksc.21.1.32.155 · DOI · Paper page
- UnionPay, 2023, 2023 consumer finance digital transformation thematic survey report
- 10.1257/aer.20230585 · DOI
- 10.1086/261605 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.08.009 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- YIN, X.
- Venue
- The Journal of Finance
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2026-05-07
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2729-2772
- ISSN
- 0022-1082
- 1540-6261
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
- Licence
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
- doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning in the Limit: Income Inference from Credit Extensions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jofi.70040
- The paper
- YIN, X. (2026). Learning in the Limit: Income Inference from Credit Extensions. The Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.70040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.